The Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Motiva SmoothSilk Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Patients Undergoing Primary and Revisional Breast Augmentation: Three-Year Clinical Data.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae134
Caroline Glicksman, Andrew Wolfe, Patricia McGuire
{"title":"The Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Motiva SmoothSilk Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Patients Undergoing Primary and Revisional Breast Augmentation: Three-Year Clinical Data.","authors":"Caroline Glicksman, Andrew Wolfe, Patricia McGuire","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silicone breast implant design has evolved over the last 50 years. Regulatory bodies including the FDA require data to support the modifications designed to improve the safety, efficacy, longevity, and biocompatibility of breast implants.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors reviewed the 3-year data on the safety and effectiveness of Motiva (Establishment Labs Holdings, Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) SmoothSilk silicone gel-filled breast implants submitted to the FDA. The current submitted data include the primary breast augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Motiva IDE is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, 10-year pivotal study in which data are collected on breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revisional surgery. Three-year data were submitted to the FDA on adverse events, reoperations, patient and physician satisfaction, connective tissue diseases, and quality of life validated instruments. A subset of the patients underwent annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at years 1, 2, and 3 to screen for implant rupture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 451 patients were implanted in the primary augmentation cohort and 109 patients in the revisional augmentation cohort. There were 218 patients enrolled in the MRI cohort. Reported rates for reoperation for any reason were 6.1% in the primary augmentation cohort (92.4% follow-up) and 25.8% in the revisional augmentation cohort (88.7% follow-up).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Motiva implants were first introduced in 2010. The 3-year Motiva data suggests that the leading cause of revisional surgery has shifted from capsular contracture and rupture to more subjective indications for reoperation such as malposition and size change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-year data from the primary augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts submitted to the FDA demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Motiva implants. There were low complication rates for implant-related complications and high surgeon and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 2: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1273-1285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Silicone breast implant design has evolved over the last 50 years. Regulatory bodies including the FDA require data to support the modifications designed to improve the safety, efficacy, longevity, and biocompatibility of breast implants.

Objectives: The authors reviewed the 3-year data on the safety and effectiveness of Motiva (Establishment Labs Holdings, Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) SmoothSilk silicone gel-filled breast implants submitted to the FDA. The current submitted data include the primary breast augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts.

Methods: The Motiva IDE is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, 10-year pivotal study in which data are collected on breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revisional surgery. Three-year data were submitted to the FDA on adverse events, reoperations, patient and physician satisfaction, connective tissue diseases, and quality of life validated instruments. A subset of the patients underwent annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at years 1, 2, and 3 to screen for implant rupture.

Results: A total of 451 patients were implanted in the primary augmentation cohort and 109 patients in the revisional augmentation cohort. There were 218 patients enrolled in the MRI cohort. Reported rates for reoperation for any reason were 6.1% in the primary augmentation cohort (92.4% follow-up) and 25.8% in the revisional augmentation cohort (88.7% follow-up).

Discussion: Motiva implants were first introduced in 2010. The 3-year Motiva data suggests that the leading cause of revisional surgery has shifted from capsular contracture and rupture to more subjective indications for reoperation such as malposition and size change.

Conclusions: Three-year data from the primary augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts submitted to the FDA demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Motiva implants. There were low complication rates for implant-related complications and high surgeon and patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence: 2:

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motiva光滑丝绸硅凝胶填充乳房假体对初次和再次隆胸患者的安全性和有效性研究》(The Study of Safety and Effectiveness of Motiva SmoothSilk Silicone Gel-Filling Breast Implants in Patients Undering Primary and Revisional Breast Augmentation):三年临床数据。
背景:硅胶乳房植入物的设计在过去 50 年中不断发展。包括美国食品及药物管理局在内的监管机构要求提供数据,以支持为提高乳房植入物的安全性、有效性、寿命和生物相容性而进行的修改:作者回顾了向美国食品药品管理局提交的有关 Motiva(哥斯达黎加阿拉胡埃拉市 Establishment Labs Holdings 公司)SmoothSilk 硅凝胶填充乳房植入物安全性和有效性的 3 年数据。目前提交的数据包括初次隆胸和翻修隆胸队列:Motiva IDE 是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、为期 10 年的关键性研究,其中收集了有关隆胸、重建和翻修手术的数据。三年的不良事件、再手术、患者和医生满意度、结缔组织疾病和生活质量验证工具的数据已提交给 FDA。一部分患者在第一、第二和第三年每年接受一次磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以筛查植入物是否破裂:结果:共有 451 名患者接受了初次增量手术,109 名患者接受了翻修增量手术。核磁共振成像队列中有 218 名患者。据报告,因任何原因再次手术的比例在初次增大队列中为 6.1%(随访率为 92.4%),在翻修增大队列中为 25.8%(随访率为 88.7%):讨论:Motiva种植体于2010年首次推出。Motiva的3年数据表明,翻修手术的主要原因已从囊膜挛缩和破裂转变为更多主观的再手术指征,如位置不正和大小改变:提交给美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的初次隆胸和翻修隆胸队列的三年数据证明了Motiva假体的安全性和有效性。与种植体相关的并发症发生率较低,外科医生和患者的满意度较高:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of RelabotulinumtoxinA, a New Ready-to-Use Liquid Formulation Botulinum Toxin: Results From the READY-1 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial in Glabellar Lines. IL-9 Is a Biomarker of BIA-ALCL Detected Rapidly by Lateral Flow Assay. Long-term Implications of Cosmetic Breast Surgeries on Subsequent Breast Reconstruction. The Impact of Vaginoplasty on Female and Male Sexual Function and Satisfaction. An In-Depth Analysis of 1370 Consecutive Abdominoplasties: Fascial Plication Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism, and Scoring for Plication Improves the Caprini Risk Assessment Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1