Cause-Specific Mortality among Infants in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Azithromycin Compared to Placebo for Prevention of Mortality.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.24-0186
Mamadou Ouattara, Ali Sié, Mamadou Bountogo, Valentin Boudo, Thierry Ouedraogo, Clarisse Dah, Elodie Lebas, Huiyu Hu, Aimee Lansdale, Ian Fetterman, Benjamin F Arnold, Thomas M Lietman, Catherine E Oldenburg
{"title":"Cause-Specific Mortality among Infants in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Azithromycin Compared to Placebo for Prevention of Mortality.","authors":"Mamadou Ouattara, Ali Sié, Mamadou Bountogo, Valentin Boudo, Thierry Ouedraogo, Clarisse Dah, Elodie Lebas, Huiyu Hu, Aimee Lansdale, Ian Fetterman, Benjamin F Arnold, Thomas M Lietman, Catherine E Oldenburg","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although community randomized trials have found a reduction in all-cause child mortality in communities receiving mass azithromycin distribution compared with placebo, individually randomized trials have not found similar protective effects. If a direct effect of azithromycin for prevention of child mortality exists, it is likely due to reduction in infectious mortality. Here, we assessed cause-specific mortality in a large randomized controlled trial of azithromycin administered during well-infant visits in Burkina Faso for prevention of mortality. Among 32,877 enrolled infants, the most common causes of death by 6 months of age were malaria, acute respiratory infections, and diarrheal disease. We found no evidence of a difference in the distribution of cause of death by randomized treatment assignment (P = 0.42) or in any infectious-specific cause of death. The results of this analysis are consistent with no direct effect of azithromycin on infant mortality when administered during well-infant visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0186","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although community randomized trials have found a reduction in all-cause child mortality in communities receiving mass azithromycin distribution compared with placebo, individually randomized trials have not found similar protective effects. If a direct effect of azithromycin for prevention of child mortality exists, it is likely due to reduction in infectious mortality. Here, we assessed cause-specific mortality in a large randomized controlled trial of azithromycin administered during well-infant visits in Burkina Faso for prevention of mortality. Among 32,877 enrolled infants, the most common causes of death by 6 months of age were malaria, acute respiratory infections, and diarrheal disease. We found no evidence of a difference in the distribution of cause of death by randomized treatment assignment (P = 0.42) or in any infectious-specific cause of death. The results of this analysis are consistent with no direct effect of azithromycin on infant mortality when administered during well-infant visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿奇霉素与安慰剂相比可预防婴儿死亡的随机对照试验中婴儿的特定病因死亡率。
尽管社区随机试验发现,与安慰剂相比,在大规模分发阿奇霉素的社区,儿童全因死亡率有所降低,但单独随机试验并未发现类似的保护效果。如果阿奇霉素对预防儿童死亡有直接效果,那很可能是由于降低了感染性死亡率。在此,我们评估了在布基纳法索进行的一项大型随机对照试验中,在婴儿健康检查期间服用阿奇霉素以预防死亡的特定原因死亡率。在 32,877 名参加试验的婴儿中,6 个月大时最常见的死亡原因是疟疾、急性呼吸道感染和腹泻。我们没有发现随机治疗分配的死因分布有差异(P = 0.42),也没有发现任何特定感染的死因有差异。分析结果表明,在婴儿健康检查期间使用阿奇霉素不会对婴儿死亡率产生直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1