Evaluation of Rehabilitation Techniques for Traumatic Ulnar Nerve Injuries After Surgical Repair: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004123
Danielle Sim, Keith T Kuo, Waldemar Rodriguez-Silva, Stella Seal, Lourdes Filippi, Sami Tuffaha, Ala Elhelali
{"title":"Evaluation of Rehabilitation Techniques for Traumatic Ulnar Nerve Injuries After Surgical Repair: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Danielle Sim, Keith T Kuo, Waldemar Rodriguez-Silva, Stella Seal, Lourdes Filippi, Sami Tuffaha, Ala Elhelali","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic ulnar nerve injuries often result in significant loss of motor and sensory function, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Physical rehabilitation is crucial for recovery, but standardized treatment protocols are lacking. This study aims to systematically review rehabilitation techniques to identify future research direction and improve existing protocols for ulnar nerve injury patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried from inception until July 31, 2023. Articles containing axonotmesis or neurotmesis injuries of the ulnar nerve were included. Reviews, opinions, editorials, technical reports without clinical outcomes, conference abstracts, non-English text, nonhuman studies, and studies without adult patients were excluded. Three independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction using Covidence, and risk of bias assessments utilizing Cochrane and JBI tools. Because of article heterogeneity, a narrative review was conducted. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number CRD42023442016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review included one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies (103 patients), which exhibited differences in study quality. Overall, motor and sensory outcomes improved after rehabilitation. Rehabilitation techniques varied widely, and early sensory reeducation appeared to improve sensory function. Only two studies included patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diverse rehabilitation techniques are used to address ulnar nerve injuries. The low number of included studies, differences in study quality, and small sample size underscore the need for larger and more inclusive studies to improve functional recovery after ulnar nerve injuries. Future research should consider the impact of patient and injury characteristics to develop comprehensive treatment guidelines for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic ulnar nerve injuries often result in significant loss of motor and sensory function, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Physical rehabilitation is crucial for recovery, but standardized treatment protocols are lacking. This study aims to systematically review rehabilitation techniques to identify future research direction and improve existing protocols for ulnar nerve injury patients.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried from inception until July 31, 2023. Articles containing axonotmesis or neurotmesis injuries of the ulnar nerve were included. Reviews, opinions, editorials, technical reports without clinical outcomes, conference abstracts, non-English text, nonhuman studies, and studies without adult patients were excluded. Three independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction using Covidence, and risk of bias assessments utilizing Cochrane and JBI tools. Because of article heterogeneity, a narrative review was conducted. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number CRD42023442016.

Results: This systematic review included one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies (103 patients), which exhibited differences in study quality. Overall, motor and sensory outcomes improved after rehabilitation. Rehabilitation techniques varied widely, and early sensory reeducation appeared to improve sensory function. Only two studies included patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions: Diverse rehabilitation techniques are used to address ulnar nerve injuries. The low number of included studies, differences in study quality, and small sample size underscore the need for larger and more inclusive studies to improve functional recovery after ulnar nerve injuries. Future research should consider the impact of patient and injury characteristics to develop comprehensive treatment guidelines for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤性尺神经损伤手术修复后的康复技术评估:系统回顾
背景:创伤性尺神经损伤通常会导致运动和感觉功能严重丧失,对患者的生活质量造成负面影响。物理康复对康复至关重要,但目前缺乏标准化的治疗方案。本研究旨在系统回顾康复技术,以确定未来的研究方向,并改进尺神经损伤患者的现有治疗方案:方法:对 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了查询,查询时间从开始到 2023 年 7 月 31 日。其中包括尺神经轴突瘤或神经瘤损伤的文章。不包括评论、观点、社论、无临床结果的技术报告、会议摘要、非英文文本、非人类研究和无成人患者的研究。三位独立审稿人使用 Covidence 进行筛选和数据提取,并使用 Cochrane 和 JBI 工具进行偏倚风险评估。由于文章存在异质性,因此进行了叙述性综述。该方案已在国际系统综述前瞻性注册(PROSPERO)数据库中注册,注册号为 CRD42023442016:本系统综述包括一项随机对照试验和四项观察性研究(103 名患者),研究质量存在差异。总体而言,康复后患者的运动和感官功能均有所改善。康复技术差别很大,早期感觉再教育似乎能改善感觉功能。只有两项研究纳入了患者报告的结果:结论:治疗尺神经损伤的康复技术多种多样。结论:针对尺神经损伤的康复技术多种多样,但纳入的研究数量少、研究质量参差不齐且样本量较小,这突出表明需要进行更大规模、更具包容性的研究,以改善尺神经损伤后的功能恢复。未来的研究应考虑患者和损伤特征的影响,为这些患者制定全面的治疗指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Application Discrepancies in the 2023-2024 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Facial Artery Branch Thrombolysis for Nasal Vascular Embolism Induced by Hyaluronic Acid Injection. Management of Delayed Vascular Occlusion in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report. Management of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation-Associated Groin Wound Complications With Muscle Flaps at a High-Acuity Cardiac Referral Center. Micro/Nanobubble-Assisted Lipotransfer: In Vivo Evidence of Improved Graft Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1