Insu Kim, Sun Ha Choi, Shin Yup Lee, Seung Soo Yoo, Ji Eun Park, Kyeong-Cheol Shin, Jong Geol Jang, Kyung Soo Hong, Yong Shik Kwon, Sun Hyo Park, Keum-Ju Choi, Chi Young Jung, Mi-Hyun Kim, Soo Han Kim, Hee Yun Seol, Jehun Kim, Jin-Han Park, Tae Hoon Kim, Jung Seop Eom, June Hong Ahn
{"title":"PD-L1 as a Biomarker for the Efficacy of Durvalumab in Stage III EGFR Mutant NSCLC.","authors":"Insu Kim, Sun Ha Choi, Shin Yup Lee, Seung Soo Yoo, Ji Eun Park, Kyeong-Cheol Shin, Jong Geol Jang, Kyung Soo Hong, Yong Shik Kwon, Sun Hyo Park, Keum-Ju Choi, Chi Young Jung, Mi-Hyun Kim, Soo Han Kim, Hee Yun Seol, Jehun Kim, Jin-Han Park, Tae Hoon Kim, Jung Seop Eom, June Hong Ahn","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Durvalumab consolidation is less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFR M+) NSCLC. Studies of durvalumab on EGFR M+ NSCLC as an expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of durvalumab on PD-L1 expression in EGFR M+ patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 249 unresectable stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox multivariate analysis was performed based on EGFR and PD-L1 statuses: EGFR M-, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort A); EGFR M-, PD-L1 <50% (cohort B); EGFR M+, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort C); and EGFR M+, PD-L1 <50% (cohort D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 31 of 249 (12.4%) and 218 of the 249 (87.6%) patients had EGFR M+ and EGFR M- NSCLC, respectively. Median PFSs and OSs did not differ (PFS: 16.6 vs. 18.7 months, p=0.591; OS: 37.4 vs. 35.7 months, p=0.271). Median PFS of cohort A did not significantly differ from the median PFSs of cohorts B and C, but it was significantly longer than the median PFS of cohort D (23.7 vs. 15.2 months, p=0.045). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that cohort D exhibited a worse PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.66, p=0.025) compared with cohort A. Median OSs were not different between the four cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Durvalumab consolidation provided similar benefit in EGFR M+ patients with PD-L1 ≥50% compared with EGFR M- patients. A therapeutic role of durvalumab in patients with EGFR M+, high PD-L1 unresectable stage III NSCLC should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"44 10","pages":"4505-4516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: Durvalumab consolidation is less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFR M+) NSCLC. Studies of durvalumab on EGFR M+ NSCLC as an expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of durvalumab on PD-L1 expression in EGFR M+ patients.
Patients and methods: This study included 249 unresectable stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox multivariate analysis was performed based on EGFR and PD-L1 statuses: EGFR M-, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort A); EGFR M-, PD-L1 <50% (cohort B); EGFR M+, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort C); and EGFR M+, PD-L1 <50% (cohort D).
Results: Overall, 31 of 249 (12.4%) and 218 of the 249 (87.6%) patients had EGFR M+ and EGFR M- NSCLC, respectively. Median PFSs and OSs did not differ (PFS: 16.6 vs. 18.7 months, p=0.591; OS: 37.4 vs. 35.7 months, p=0.271). Median PFS of cohort A did not significantly differ from the median PFSs of cohorts B and C, but it was significantly longer than the median PFS of cohort D (23.7 vs. 15.2 months, p=0.045). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that cohort D exhibited a worse PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.66, p=0.025) compared with cohort A. Median OSs were not different between the four cohorts.
Conclusion: Durvalumab consolidation provided similar benefit in EGFR M+ patients with PD-L1 ≥50% compared with EGFR M- patients. A therapeutic role of durvalumab in patients with EGFR M+, high PD-L1 unresectable stage III NSCLC should be considered.
将 PD-L1 作为 Durvalumab 在表皮生长因子受体突变 NSCLC III 期疗效的生物标记物
背景/目的:在表皮生长因子受体突变型(EGFR M+)NSCLC 患者中,杜伐单抗的巩固治疗效果较差。作为程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达的一种表现形式,杜伐单抗对表皮生长因子受体M+ NSCLC的研究十分有限。本研究旨在确定度伐卢单抗对表皮生长因子受体M+患者PD-L1表达的影响:这项研究纳入了249例接受度伐卢单抗治疗的不可切除的III期NSCLC患者。主要结果是无进展生存期(PFS)。根据EGFR和PD-L1状态进行了Cox多变量分析:EGFR M-、PD-L1≥50%(队列A);EGFR M-、PD-L1 结果:总体而言,249名患者中有31名(12.4%)和218名(87.6%)分别患有表皮生长因子受体M+和表皮生长因子受体M-的NSCLC。中位生存期和OS没有差异(生存期:16.6个月 vs. 18.7个月,p=0.591;OS:37.4个月 vs. 35.7个月,p=0.271)。队列A的中位生存期与队列B和队列C的中位生存期无明显差异,但明显长于队列D的中位生存期(23.7个月 vs. 15.2个月,p=0.045)。Cox多变量分析显示,与队列A相比,队列D的PFS更差(调整后危险比=2.27,95%置信区间=1.11-4.66,p=0.025):结论:PD-L1≥50%的表皮生长因子受体M+患者与表皮生长因子受体M-患者相比,杜伐单抗巩固治疗的获益相似。应考虑在表皮生长因子受体 M+、PD-L1 高的不可切除 III 期 NSCLC 患者中使用杜伐单抗。
期刊介绍:
ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed.
ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies).
Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.