Provision and outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgery in a metropolitan versus a provincial population of New Zealand.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/ans.19206
Henry Witcomb Cahill, Matthew McGuinness, Jamie Struthers, Ian Bissett, Christopher Harmston
{"title":"Provision and outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgery in a metropolitan versus a provincial population of New Zealand.","authors":"Henry Witcomb Cahill, Matthew McGuinness, Jamie Struthers, Ian Bissett, Christopher Harmston","doi":"10.1111/ans.19206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is an important health problem worldwide. The prevalence of obesity in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) is the third highest amongst OECD countries. Previous studies have demonstrated inequity in the provision of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) across AoNZ, but detailed data regarding patients and surgical outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study is to examine the rates and outcomes of BMS between patients domiciled in a metropolitan versus provincial area in AoNZ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year retrospective observational cohort study of all patients who received BMS domiciled in a metropolitan or a provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ was performed. Interrogation of patient electronic medical records and clinical notes was performed to collect the required baseline characteristics, secondary outcome measure data and confirm domicile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of BMS was 6.1 times higher in the population with class III obesity domiciled in the metropolitan versus the provincial population. Patients in the metropolitan area were less obese, had lower rates of diabetes and had a wider range of procedures performed. Māori were underrepresented in both cohorts. There was a higher resolution of diabetes in the provincial patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has highlighted significant differences in the rate, type and outcomes of BMS between a metropolitan and provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ. This represents a significant health inequity. Changes in national and regional policies are needed to ensure equitable care for patients with obesity in AoNZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is an important health problem worldwide. The prevalence of obesity in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) is the third highest amongst OECD countries. Previous studies have demonstrated inequity in the provision of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) across AoNZ, but detailed data regarding patients and surgical outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study is to examine the rates and outcomes of BMS between patients domiciled in a metropolitan versus provincial area in AoNZ.

Methods: A 5-year retrospective observational cohort study of all patients who received BMS domiciled in a metropolitan or a provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ was performed. Interrogation of patient electronic medical records and clinical notes was performed to collect the required baseline characteristics, secondary outcome measure data and confirm domicile.

Results: The rate of BMS was 6.1 times higher in the population with class III obesity domiciled in the metropolitan versus the provincial population. Patients in the metropolitan area were less obese, had lower rates of diabetes and had a wider range of procedures performed. Māori were underrepresented in both cohorts. There was a higher resolution of diabetes in the provincial patients.

Conclusion: This study has highlighted significant differences in the rate, type and outcomes of BMS between a metropolitan and provincial area in the Northern region of AoNZ. This represents a significant health inequity. Changes in national and regional policies are needed to ensure equitable care for patients with obesity in AoNZ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰大都市与外省人口中公费减肥手术的提供情况和结果。
背景:肥胖症是全球范围内的一个重要健康问题。新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的肥胖症发病率在经合组织国家中排名第三。以往的研究表明,新西兰各地在提供减肥和代谢手术(BMS)方面存在不公平现象,但缺乏有关患者和手术结果的详细数据。本研究旨在探讨澳新地区大都市与省级地区患者之间的肥胖代谢手术率和手术效果:对居住在澳新北部地区大都市或省级地区的所有接受 BMS 的患者进行了为期 5 年的回顾性队列观察研究。研究人员询问了患者的电子病历和临床笔记,以收集所需的基线特征、次要结果测量数据并确认住所:结果:居住在大城市的 III 级肥胖症患者的 BMS 患病率是居住在外省的患者的 6.1 倍。大城市地区的患者肥胖程度较轻,糖尿病发病率较低,接受手术的范围较广。两个群体中毛利人的比例都较低。外省患者的糖尿病发病率较高:这项研究强调了新西兰北部地区大都市和省级地区之间在BMS的比率、类型和结果方面的显著差异。这代表着严重的健康不公平。需要改变国家和地区政策,以确保为澳新肥胖症患者提供公平的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (cPNET): a diagnostic conundrum. Early detection of colonic anastomotic leak. Pointing to success: a discussion of the role of acad achievements in the selection of specialist surgical trainees. Provision and outcomes of publicly funded bariatric surgery in a metropolitan versus a provincial population of New Zealand. Standard v mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine modified lithotomy position: a randomized pilot study on 10-25 mm stones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1