United States Veterans' Utilization of Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders Annual Evaluation Services.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.008
Jennifer Sippel, Bella Etingen, Kevin Stroupe, Charlesnika Evans, Zhiping Huo, Belinda Frazier, Manosha Wickremasinghe, Bridget Smith
{"title":"United States Veterans' Utilization of Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders Annual Evaluation Services.","authors":"Jennifer Sippel, Bella Etingen, Kevin Stroupe, Charlesnika Evans, Zhiping Huo, Belinda Frazier, Manosha Wickremasinghe, Bridget Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate Veterans' engagement in spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D) specialty annual evaluations (AEs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>SCI/D System of Care, United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Veterans with SCI/Ds (N=14,662).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Receiving SCI/D AEs during the study period (fiscal years [FY] 2019 and 2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14,662 Veterans with SCI/Ds were included in the sample; 32.8% (n=4811) received 2 AEs, 28.8% (n=4219) received 1 AE, and 38.4% (n=5632) received no AEs, with an average of 0.9 AEs per Veteran over the 2-year study timeframe (range, 0-2y). Black Veterans had an 8% higher number of AEs than White Veterans after adjusting for other variables (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12). Veterans who lived ≥240 minutes away from a VA SCI/D System of Care Center had 45% fewer AEs than Veterans who lived within 30 minutes (adjusted RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.59). Veterans with more SCI/D specialty visits had 90% more AEs than those with fewer visits (adjusted RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.78-2.03), whereas Veterans with more outpatient visits in VA primary care had 28% fewer AEs (adjusted RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76). Veterans with higher comorbidity scores had 9% more AEs than Veterans with lower scores (adjusted RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half (62%) of Veterans received ≥1 SCI/D AE during FY19-20. Veterans living closer to a VA SCI/D System of Care Center/Hub had more engagement in SCI/D AEs. Veterans with SCI/Ds who used VA primary care outside of the SCI/D System of Care had fewer AEs. There were no major racial, age-based, or sex disparities in SCI/D AE usage. Our findings suggest the need for targeted intervention efforts to promote AE use among Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate Veterans' engagement in spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D) specialty annual evaluations (AEs).

Design: Cross-sectional retrospective cohort study.

Setting: SCI/D System of Care, United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Participants: Veterans with SCI/Ds (N=14,662).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Receiving SCI/D AEs during the study period (fiscal years [FY] 2019 and 2020).

Results: A total of 14,662 Veterans with SCI/Ds were included in the sample; 32.8% (n=4811) received 2 AEs, 28.8% (n=4219) received 1 AE, and 38.4% (n=5632) received no AEs, with an average of 0.9 AEs per Veteran over the 2-year study timeframe (range, 0-2y). Black Veterans had an 8% higher number of AEs than White Veterans after adjusting for other variables (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12). Veterans who lived ≥240 minutes away from a VA SCI/D System of Care Center had 45% fewer AEs than Veterans who lived within 30 minutes (adjusted RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.59). Veterans with more SCI/D specialty visits had 90% more AEs than those with fewer visits (adjusted RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.78-2.03), whereas Veterans with more outpatient visits in VA primary care had 28% fewer AEs (adjusted RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76). Veterans with higher comorbidity scores had 9% more AEs than Veterans with lower scores (adjusted RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.70).

Conclusions: More than half (62%) of Veterans received ≥1 SCI/D AE during FY19-20. Veterans living closer to a VA SCI/D System of Care Center/Hub had more engagement in SCI/D AEs. Veterans with SCI/Ds who used VA primary care outside of the SCI/D System of Care had fewer AEs. There were no major racial, age-based, or sex disparities in SCI/D AE usage. Our findings suggest the need for targeted intervention efforts to promote AE use among Veterans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国退伍军人利用脊髓损伤和失调年度评估服务的情况。
目标: 评估退伍军人参与脊髓损伤和疾病(SCI/D)专科年度评估的情况评估退伍军人参与脊髓损伤和失调(SCI/D)专科年度评估的情况 设计: 横断面回顾性队列研究横断面回顾性队列研究 环境:(SCI/D 护理系统,美国退伍军人事务部 (VA) 参与者:14,662 名患有 SCI/D 的退伍军人14,662名患有SCI/D的退伍军人 干预:主要结果测量:在研究期间(2019 和 2020 财年)接受 SCI/D 年度评估(AEs) 结果:共有 14,662 名患有 SCI/D 的退伍军人被纳入样本;32.8%(n=4,811)的退伍军人接受了两次 AE;28.8%(n=4,219)的退伍军人接受了一次 AE;38.4%(n=5,632)的退伍军人接受了零次 AE,在为期两年的研究期间,平均每名退伍军人接受了 0.9 次 AE(范围:0-2)。调整其他变量后,黑人退伍军人的 AEs 数量比白人退伍军人高 8%(调整后 RR:1.08,95%CI:1.04 - 1.12)。与居住在 30 分钟以内的退伍军人相比,居住在距离退伍军人 SCI/D 系统护理中心 240 分钟或更远的退伍军人的 AE 减少了 45%(调整后 RR:0.55,95% CI:0.52 - 0.59)。与就诊 SCI/D 专科次数较少的退伍军人相比,就诊 SCI/D 专科次数较多的退伍军人的 AEs 增加了 90%(调整后 RR:1.90,95% CI:1.78 - 2.03),而就诊退伍军人初级保健门诊次数较多的退伍军人的 AEs 减少了 28%(调整后 RR:0.72,95% CI:0.69 - 0.76)。共病评分较高的退伍军人与评分较低的退伍军人相比,AEs 增加了 9%(调整后 RR:0.66,95% CI:0.61 - 0.70):在 19 - 20 财年期间,超过一半(62%)的退伍军人至少接受了一次 SCI/D AE。居住在离退伍军人事务部 SCI/D 护理中心/枢纽系统较近的退伍军人参与 SCI/D AE 的次数较多。在SCI/D护理系统之外使用退伍军人事务部初级护理的SCI/D退伍军人的AE较少。在SCI/D AE的使用方面,并不存在重大的种族、年龄或性别差异。我们的研究结果表明,有必要采取有针对性的干预措施,促进退伍军人使用AE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Increased stiffness is evidenced in the deep but not superficial lumbar multifidus muscle in professional athletes with chronic low back pain. Effectiveness of a community-based exercise program for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of micro-electrolysis associated with exercises versus exercises alone on pain intensity and disability in individuals with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: A randomized clinical trial. Longitudinal goal attainment with repeat injections of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with lower limb spasticity: Results from a prospective observational study. Test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index - single item in persons with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1