Ben Beaglehole, Chris Frampton, Giles Newton-Howes, Arahia Kirikiri, Cameron Lacey
{"title":"Compulsory Community Treatment Orders and health outcomes for Māori in New Zealand.","authors":"Ben Beaglehole, Chris Frampton, Giles Newton-Howes, Arahia Kirikiri, Cameron Lacey","doi":"10.1177/00048674241280918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously analysed outcomes for all community treatment orders commenced during a 10-year period in New Zealand. Given Te Tiriti O Waitangi obligations to scrutinise health and consider equity for Māori, we completed this analysis to consider community treatment-order outcomes according to ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ministry of Health databases provided demographic, service use and medication dispensing data for community treatment-order recipients between 2009 and 2018. As non-Māori on community treatment orders are older, less deprived and less likely to be diagnosed with a Psychotic Disorder, data were categorised according to age (<35/⩾35 years), level of deprivation (New Zealand Dep levels ⩽3, 4-6 and ⩾7) and diagnosis (Psychotic Disorder/non-Psychotic Disorder). The incidences of key outcome measures (admissions, community care, medication dispensing) were calculated for periods on/off community treatment orders for Māori and non-Māori to consider the differential impact of community treatment orders according to ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Māori have high rates of community treatment order utilisation and are younger, more likely to be diagnosed with a Psychotic Disorder and spend longer receiving compulsory treatment than non-Māori. Non-Māori are more likely to receive more additional depot antipsychotic medication on-community treatment orders compared with periods off-community treatment order than Māori but other clear patterns of response distinguishing between Māori and non-Māori were not present.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differences between Māori and non-Māori for community treatment-order utilisation suggest the presence of structural inequity in underlying mental illness distribution and treatment provision. Māori cultural expertise at all levels of healthcare including healthcare planning and delivery is required to make advances and reduce disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674241280918"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241280918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We have previously analysed outcomes for all community treatment orders commenced during a 10-year period in New Zealand. Given Te Tiriti O Waitangi obligations to scrutinise health and consider equity for Māori, we completed this analysis to consider community treatment-order outcomes according to ethnicity.
Methods: Ministry of Health databases provided demographic, service use and medication dispensing data for community treatment-order recipients between 2009 and 2018. As non-Māori on community treatment orders are older, less deprived and less likely to be diagnosed with a Psychotic Disorder, data were categorised according to age (<35/⩾35 years), level of deprivation (New Zealand Dep levels ⩽3, 4-6 and ⩾7) and diagnosis (Psychotic Disorder/non-Psychotic Disorder). The incidences of key outcome measures (admissions, community care, medication dispensing) were calculated for periods on/off community treatment orders for Māori and non-Māori to consider the differential impact of community treatment orders according to ethnicity.
Results: Māori have high rates of community treatment order utilisation and are younger, more likely to be diagnosed with a Psychotic Disorder and spend longer receiving compulsory treatment than non-Māori. Non-Māori are more likely to receive more additional depot antipsychotic medication on-community treatment orders compared with periods off-community treatment order than Māori but other clear patterns of response distinguishing between Māori and non-Māori were not present.
Conclusion: The differences between Māori and non-Māori for community treatment-order utilisation suggest the presence of structural inequity in underlying mental illness distribution and treatment provision. Māori cultural expertise at all levels of healthcare including healthcare planning and delivery is required to make advances and reduce disparity.
背景:我们之前分析了新西兰十年间开始执行的所有社区治疗令的结果。考虑到Te Tiriti O Waitangi有义务审查毛利人的健康状况并考虑其公平性,我们完成了这项分析,根据种族考虑社区治疗令的结果:卫生部数据库提供了2009年至2018年间社区治疗单接受者的人口统计、服务使用和配药数据。由于接受社区治疗令的非毛利人年龄较大、贫困程度较低且被诊断出患有精神障碍的可能性较小,因此根据年龄对数据进行了分类(结果:毛利人接受社区治疗令的比例较高,而非毛利人接受社区治疗令的比例较低):与非毛利人相比,毛利人使用社区治疗令的比例较高,而且更年轻,更有可能被诊断出患有精神障碍,接受强制治疗的时间也更长。与非毛利人相比,非毛利人更有可能在接受社区治疗令期间比接受非社区治疗令期间接受更多的额外去势抗精神病药物治疗,但毛利人和非毛利人之间并不存在其他明显的反应模式:结论:毛利人和非毛利人在使用社区治疗指令方面的差异表明,在精神疾病的分布和治疗提供方面存在着结构性的不平等。各级医疗保健机构,包括医疗保健规划和提供机构,都需要具备毛利文化方面的专业知识,以便取得进步,缩小差距。
期刊介绍:
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP).
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor.
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.