The perspectives of Māori on community treatment orders: A thematic analysis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1177/00048674241285172
Arahia Kirikiri, Greg Young, Ben Beaglehole, Giles Newton-Howes
{"title":"The perspectives of Māori on community treatment orders: A thematic analysis.","authors":"Arahia Kirikiri, Greg Young, Ben Beaglehole, Giles Newton-Howes","doi":"10.1177/00048674241285172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the themes for Māori subjected to compulsory community treatment orders.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 has been utilised in Aotearoa New Zealand for more than three decades. Despite Māori having higher rates of being subject to community treatment orders, there is little research examining their perspectives of its benefits and harms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis of a purposive sample of Māori in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were developed. Māori described community treatment orders as <i>restrictive</i> and <i>stigmatising</i>. Some Māori described being poorly informed of the structures surrounding the use of community treatment orders and saw it as a mechanism to <i>circumvent information-giving</i> regarding treatment. Counterbalancing these, Māori described community treatment orders as <i>mandating support</i> and saw them as a mechanism to access care. Finally, some described their compulsory treatment status as <i>unimportant and irrelevant</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thematic analysis identified five clear themes from interview participants. Conceptualisation of community treatment orders was largely negative, although Māori acknowledged that being subject to community treatment orders demanded more support from services. Themes of stigma and restriction are common in the literature, however, conception of the use of community treatment orders to bypass consent is novel. The literature describes community treatment orders as providing support, however, in this study, the interpretation suggests a need to lose personal autonomy to receive care, a potentially 'slippery slope' towards a two-tier type service. These findings remind services of the importance of attending to cultural elements of care, being clear around the process of consent. In terms of policy, weaving in cultural understanding appears to be important from an Indigenous perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674241285172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241285172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To understand the themes for Māori subjected to compulsory community treatment orders.

Background: The Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 has been utilised in Aotearoa New Zealand for more than three decades. Despite Māori having higher rates of being subject to community treatment orders, there is little research examining their perspectives of its benefits and harms.

Methods: Thematic analysis of a purposive sample of Māori in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.

Results: Five themes were developed. Māori described community treatment orders as restrictive and stigmatising. Some Māori described being poorly informed of the structures surrounding the use of community treatment orders and saw it as a mechanism to circumvent information-giving regarding treatment. Counterbalancing these, Māori described community treatment orders as mandating support and saw them as a mechanism to access care. Finally, some described their compulsory treatment status as unimportant and irrelevant.

Conclusions: Thematic analysis identified five clear themes from interview participants. Conceptualisation of community treatment orders was largely negative, although Māori acknowledged that being subject to community treatment orders demanded more support from services. Themes of stigma and restriction are common in the literature, however, conception of the use of community treatment orders to bypass consent is novel. The literature describes community treatment orders as providing support, however, in this study, the interpretation suggests a need to lose personal autonomy to receive care, a potentially 'slippery slope' towards a two-tier type service. These findings remind services of the importance of attending to cultural elements of care, being clear around the process of consent. In terms of policy, weaving in cultural understanding appears to be important from an Indigenous perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毛利人对社区治疗令的看法:专题分析。
目的:了解接受强制社区治疗令的毛利人的主题:1992 年《精神健康(强制评估和治疗)法》在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦使用已有 30 多年。尽管毛利人接受社区治疗令的比例较高,但很少有研究探讨他们对社区治疗令的益处和害处的看法:方法:对新西兰霍克湾的毛利人进行有目的的抽样专题分析:结果:形成了五个主题。毛利人认为社区治疗令具有限制性和侮辱性。一些毛利人说,他们对社区治疗令的使用结构知之甚少,认为这是一种规避治疗信息提供的机制。与此相反,毛利人把社区治疗令说成是强制性的支持,并把它看作是一种获 得护理的机制。最后,一些人认为他们的强制治疗地位并不重要,也不相关:主题分析从访谈参与者中发现了五个明确的主题。尽管毛利人承认社区治疗令要求服务机构提供更多支持,但他们对社区治疗令的概念大多是负面的。污名化和限制的主题在文献中很常见,然而,使用社区治疗令绕过同意的概念却是新颖的。文献将社区治疗令描述为提供支持,然而,在本研究中,这种解释表明需要失去个人自主权才能接受治疗,这有可能是走向双层服务的 "滑坡"。这些研究结果提醒相关服务机构注意护理中的文化因素,明确同意过程的重要性。在政策方面,从土著人的角度来看,融入文化理解似乎非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Self-poisoning in young Australians: The impact of COVID-19 and recent trends following easing of restrictions. Letters to the Editor: Differential effects of access restriction to a highway bridge on suicide numbers by jumping. Extending the reach of involuntary treatment to substance use disorders: Is it 'compassionate' or coercive care? Policy implications of the 2020-22 Australian study of mental health and wellbeing. Glutamatergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies across schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1