Influence of Trabecular Bone Presence on Osseodensification Instrumentation: An In Vivo Study in Sheep.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Biomimetics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.3390/biomimetics9090568
Zachary Stauber, Shangtao Wu, Justin E Herbert, Amanda Willers, Edmara T P Bergamo, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Nicholas A Mirsky, Arthur Castellano, Sinan K Jabori, Marcelo V Parra, Estevam A Bonfante, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G Coelho
{"title":"Influence of Trabecular Bone Presence on Osseodensification Instrumentation: An In Vivo Study in Sheep.","authors":"Zachary Stauber, Shangtao Wu, Justin E Herbert, Amanda Willers, Edmara T P Bergamo, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Nicholas A Mirsky, Arthur Castellano, Sinan K Jabori, Marcelo V Parra, Estevam A Bonfante, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G Coelho","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics9090568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osseodensification enhances the stability of endosteal implants. However, pre-clinical studies utilizing osseodensification instrumentation do not account for the limited presence of trabeculae seen clinically. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of osseodensification instrumentation on osteotomy healing in scenarios with and without the presence of trabecular bone. A ~10 cm incision was made over the hip of twelve sheep. Trabecular bone was surgically removed from twelve sites (one site/animal; negative control (Neg. Ctrl)) and left intact at twelve sites (one site/animal; experimental group (Exp.)). All osteotomies were created using the osseodensification drilling protocol. Each osteotomy received an endosteal implant and was evaluated after 3 or 12 weeks of healing (n = 6 animals/time). Histology revealed increased woven and lamellar bone surrounding the implants in the Exp. group relative to the Neg. Ctrl group. The Exp. group demonstrated the presence of bone fragments, which acted as nucleating sites, thereby enhancing the bone formation and remodeling processes. Bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and bone area fractional occupancy (%BAFO) were significantly higher in the Exp. group relative to the Neg. Ctrl group both at 3 weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.009 and <i>p</i> = 0.043) and 12 weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.010 and <i>p</i> = 0.008). Osseodensification instrumentation in the presence of trabecular bone significantly improved osseointegration. However, no negative influences such as necrosis, inflammation, microfractures, or dehiscence were observed in the absence/limited presence of trabeculae.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11429753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9090568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osseodensification enhances the stability of endosteal implants. However, pre-clinical studies utilizing osseodensification instrumentation do not account for the limited presence of trabeculae seen clinically. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of osseodensification instrumentation on osteotomy healing in scenarios with and without the presence of trabecular bone. A ~10 cm incision was made over the hip of twelve sheep. Trabecular bone was surgically removed from twelve sites (one site/animal; negative control (Neg. Ctrl)) and left intact at twelve sites (one site/animal; experimental group (Exp.)). All osteotomies were created using the osseodensification drilling protocol. Each osteotomy received an endosteal implant and was evaluated after 3 or 12 weeks of healing (n = 6 animals/time). Histology revealed increased woven and lamellar bone surrounding the implants in the Exp. group relative to the Neg. Ctrl group. The Exp. group demonstrated the presence of bone fragments, which acted as nucleating sites, thereby enhancing the bone formation and remodeling processes. Bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and bone area fractional occupancy (%BAFO) were significantly higher in the Exp. group relative to the Neg. Ctrl group both at 3 weeks (p = 0.009 and p = 0.043) and 12 weeks (p = 0.010 and p = 0.008). Osseodensification instrumentation in the presence of trabecular bone significantly improved osseointegration. However, no negative influences such as necrosis, inflammation, microfractures, or dehiscence were observed in the absence/limited presence of trabeculae.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨小梁的存在对骨质增生器械的影响:绵羊体内研究
骨质增生可增强骨内植入物的稳定性。然而,利用骨强化器械进行的临床前研究并没有考虑到临床上有限的骨小梁存在。本研究旨在评估骨质增生器械在有骨小梁和无骨小梁情况下对截骨愈合的影响。在 12 只绵羊的髋部切开约 10 厘米的切口。从十二个部位(每个部位一只;阴性对照组(Neg. Ctrl))和十二个部位(每个部位一只;实验组(Exp.)所有截骨均采用骨强化钻孔方案。每个截骨部位都植入了骨内植入物,并在愈合 3 或 12 周后进行评估(n = 6 只动物/次)。组织学显示,相对于 Neg.对照组。Exp.组显示存在骨碎片,这些骨碎片可作为成核点,从而促进骨形成和重塑过程。相对于阴性对照组,阳性对照组的骨与种植体接触率(%BIC)和骨面积占比(%BAFO)都明显高于阴性对照组。在 3 周(p = 0.009 和 p = 0.043)和 12 周(p = 0.010 和 p = 0.008)时,Exp.在骨小梁存在的情况下,骨强化器械能明显改善骨结合。但是,在没有/仅有骨小梁的情况下,没有观察到坏死、炎症、微骨折或开裂等负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brain-Inspired Architecture for Spiking Neural Networks. Explorative Binary Gray Wolf Optimizer with Quadratic Interpolation for Feature Selection. Path Planning of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on a Multi-Strategy Improved Pelican Optimization Algorithm. Performance Comparison of Bio-Inspired Algorithms for Optimizing an ANN-Based MPPT Forecast for PV Systems. Clinical Applications of Micro/Nanobubble Technology in Neurological Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1