Improving breast cancer multidisciplinary meetings through streamlining with protocol-based management.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Health & Care Informatics Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100949
Aaditya Prakash Sinha, Katie Badawy, Belul Shifa, Zhane Peterson, Mohamed Attia, Sarah Pinder, Arnie Purushotham
{"title":"Improving breast cancer multidisciplinary meetings through streamlining with protocol-based management.","authors":"Aaditya Prakash Sinha, Katie Badawy, Belul Shifa, Zhane Peterson, Mohamed Attia, Sarah Pinder, Arnie Purushotham","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) are part of standard of care for patients with cancer. Streamlining is essential for high-quality care and efficiency. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a protocol to remove patients with benign breast disease from discussion at the MDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective review of 218 MDMs evaluated patients with benign breast disease over 22 months. This was followed by a protocol implementation phase over 54 MDMs (6.5 months). Patients meeting specific criteria were excluded from discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, each MDM consisted of 37 patients, 34.2% of whose conditions were benign and potentially could have been removed from discussion. The implementation phase showed 708/2248 patients (32.5%) were benign of which 631 cases (89%) met the eligibility criteria and were removed from the MDM list allowing more time for discussion of complex cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a protocol can safely exclude patients with benign disease from MDM discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) are part of standard of care for patients with cancer. Streamlining is essential for high-quality care and efficiency. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a protocol to remove patients with benign breast disease from discussion at the MDM.

Methods: A prospective review of 218 MDMs evaluated patients with benign breast disease over 22 months. This was followed by a protocol implementation phase over 54 MDMs (6.5 months). Patients meeting specific criteria were excluded from discussion.

Results: On average, each MDM consisted of 37 patients, 34.2% of whose conditions were benign and potentially could have been removed from discussion. The implementation phase showed 708/2248 patients (32.5%) were benign of which 631 cases (89%) met the eligibility criteria and were removed from the MDM list allowing more time for discussion of complex cases.

Conclusion: Implementing a protocol can safely exclude patients with benign disease from MDM discussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于协议的管理简化乳腺癌多学科会议。
目的:多学科会议(MDM)是癌症患者标准护理的一部分。精简会议对于提高医疗质量和效率至关重要。本研究评估了在多学科会议讨论中剔除良性乳腺疾病患者的方案的可行性:方法:在 22 个月内对 218 名乳腺良性疾病患者进行了前瞻性审查。随后在 54 次 MDM(6.5 个月)中进行了协议实施阶段。符合特定标准的患者被排除在讨论之外:平均而言,每个 MDM 包括 37 名患者,其中 34.2% 的病情为良性,有可能被排除在讨论之外。实施阶段的结果显示,708/2248 例患者(32.5%)为良性,其中 631 例(89%)符合资格标准,被从 MDM 名单中剔除,从而有更多时间讨论复杂病例:结论:实施协议可以安全地将良性疾病患者排除在 MDM 讨论之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding prescribing errors for system optimisation: the technology-related error mechanism classification. Detection of hypertension from pharyngeal images using deep learning algorithm in primary care settings in Japan. PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis. Method to apply temporal graph analysis on electronic patient record data to explore healthcare professional-patient interaction intensity: a cohort study. Harnessing digital footprint data for population health: a discussion on collaboration, challenges and opportunities in the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1