Building capacity and capability for quality improvement: insights from a nascent regional health system.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903
Yan Jun Ng, Kelvin Sin Min Lew, Adrian Ujin Yap, Lit Sin Quek, Chi Hong Hwang
{"title":"Building capacity and capability for quality improvement: insights from a nascent regional health system.","authors":"Yan Jun Ng, Kelvin Sin Min Lew, Adrian Ujin Yap, Lit Sin Quek, Chi Hong Hwang","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) is critical in facilitating advancements in patient outcomes, system efficiency and professional growth. This paper aimed to elucidate the underlying rationale and framework guiding JurongHealth Campus (JHC), a nascent Regional Health System, in developing its QI capacity and capability at all levels of the organisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exhaustive analysis of high-performance management systems and effective improvement frameworks was conducted, and the principles were customised to suit the local context.A three-phased approach was applied: (1) developing the JHC QI framework; (2) building capacity through a dosing approach and (3) building capability through QI projects and initiatives using the model for improvement (MFI). Three components of the RE-AIM implementation strategy were assessed: (1) Reach-overall percentage of staff trained; (2) Effectiveness-outcomes from organisation-wide improvement projects and (3) Adoption-number of QI projects collated and presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of staff trained in QI increased from 11.3% to 22.0% between January 2020 and March 2024, with over 350 projects documented in the central repository. The effectiveness of the MFI was demonstrated by improving inpatient discharges before 12pm performance from 21.52% to 25.84% and reducing the 30-day inpatient readmission rate from 13.92% to 12.96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four critical factors for an effective QI framework were identified: (1) establishing a common language for improvement; (2) defining distinct roles and skills for improvement at different levels of the organisation; (3) adopting a dosing approach to QI training according to the defined roles and skills and (4) building a critical mass of committed staff trained in QI practice. The pragmatic approach to developing QI capability is both scalable and applicable to emerging healthcare institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Quality improvement (QI) is critical in facilitating advancements in patient outcomes, system efficiency and professional growth. This paper aimed to elucidate the underlying rationale and framework guiding JurongHealth Campus (JHC), a nascent Regional Health System, in developing its QI capacity and capability at all levels of the organisation.

Methods: An exhaustive analysis of high-performance management systems and effective improvement frameworks was conducted, and the principles were customised to suit the local context.A three-phased approach was applied: (1) developing the JHC QI framework; (2) building capacity through a dosing approach and (3) building capability through QI projects and initiatives using the model for improvement (MFI). Three components of the RE-AIM implementation strategy were assessed: (1) Reach-overall percentage of staff trained; (2) Effectiveness-outcomes from organisation-wide improvement projects and (3) Adoption-number of QI projects collated and presented.

Results: The percentage of staff trained in QI increased from 11.3% to 22.0% between January 2020 and March 2024, with over 350 projects documented in the central repository. The effectiveness of the MFI was demonstrated by improving inpatient discharges before 12pm performance from 21.52% to 25.84% and reducing the 30-day inpatient readmission rate from 13.92% to 12.96%.

Conclusion: Four critical factors for an effective QI framework were identified: (1) establishing a common language for improvement; (2) defining distinct roles and skills for improvement at different levels of the organisation; (3) adopting a dosing approach to QI training according to the defined roles and skills and (4) building a critical mass of committed staff trained in QI practice. The pragmatic approach to developing QI capability is both scalable and applicable to emerging healthcare institutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高质量的能力建设:新生地区卫生系统的启示。
目标:质量改进(QI)对于促进患者疗效、系统效率和专业成长至关重要。本文旨在阐明指导裕廊医疗中心(JurongHealth Campus,简称 JHC)这一新兴区域医疗系统在组织各个层面发展质量改进能力的基本原理和框架:方法:对高绩效管理系统和有效的改进框架进行了详尽的分析,并根据当地情况对原则进行了定制。采用了三阶段方法:(1) 制定 JHC QI 框架;(2) 通过剂量法进行能力建设;(3) 通过使用改进模型 (MFI) 的 QI 项目和倡议进行能力建设。对 RE-AIM 实施战略的三个组成部分进行了评估:(1)覆盖面--接受培训的员工总比例;(2)有效性--全组织范围内改进项目的成果;(3)采用率--整理和展示的 QI 项目数量:结果:在 2020 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,接受质量改进培训的员工比例从 11.3% 提高到 22.0%,中央资料库中记录了 350 多个项目。通过将住院病人中午 12 点前出院率从 21.52% 提高到 25.84%,并将 30 天住院病人再入院率从 13.92% 降低到 12.96%,证明了管理框架倡议的有效性:结论:有效的质量改进框架有四个关键因素:结论:有效的质量改进框架有四个关键因素:(1) 建立共同的改进语言;(2) 在组织的不同层面定义不同的改进角色和技能;(3) 根据定义的角色和技能,采用定量的方法进行质量改进培训;(4) 培养大量致力于质量改进实践的员工。开发 QI 能力的务实方法具有可扩展性,适用于新兴医疗机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1