Improving role allocation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department: a quality improvement project.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002870
Sweta Giri, Dawa Gyeltshen, Neten Wangchuk, Kinley Dorji, Loday Drakpa, Sonam Wangdi, Kiran Biswa Diyali
{"title":"Improving role allocation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Sweta Giri, Dawa Gyeltshen, Neten Wangchuk, Kinley Dorji, Loday Drakpa, Sonam Wangdi, Kiran Biswa Diyali","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In any healthcare setting, cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPRs) stand out as demanding and chaotic resuscitation endeavours. Emergency departments (EDs) witness a significant volume of CPRs. Given the critical nature of CPR, content knowledge and procedural skills alone fall short in delivering optimal care. Effective teamwork, complemented by a well-coordinated response, is imperative for achieving favourable patient outcomes. A survey conducted in our ED highlighted that while the majority of staff acknowledged the significance of teamwork in CPR and were aware of the whiteboard for assigning team roles, only 19% were familiar with their individual roles during CPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this gap, our project aimed to increasing the role delegation for CPR from 19% to 80% within 2 months. We formed an interprofessional team and implemented strategies through four plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions encompassed increasing sensitisation, creating a simplified format for assigning team roles and entrusting the nursing team leader of each shift with the responsibility of role assignment for accountability. The sharing of progress charts for acknowledgment served as a motivating factor, leading to sustained adherence to the project goals without necessitating reminders in the final two weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This project proved to be highly successful as our process indicator steadily increased and remained above the target for 4 consecutive weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results underscore the importance of patience and teamwork in achieving project objectives. It serves as a good example of the efficiency of simple and cost-effective interventions, one that can be replicated and implemented in other EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In any healthcare setting, cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPRs) stand out as demanding and chaotic resuscitation endeavours. Emergency departments (EDs) witness a significant volume of CPRs. Given the critical nature of CPR, content knowledge and procedural skills alone fall short in delivering optimal care. Effective teamwork, complemented by a well-coordinated response, is imperative for achieving favourable patient outcomes. A survey conducted in our ED highlighted that while the majority of staff acknowledged the significance of teamwork in CPR and were aware of the whiteboard for assigning team roles, only 19% were familiar with their individual roles during CPR.

Methods: To address this gap, our project aimed to increasing the role delegation for CPR from 19% to 80% within 2 months. We formed an interprofessional team and implemented strategies through four plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions encompassed increasing sensitisation, creating a simplified format for assigning team roles and entrusting the nursing team leader of each shift with the responsibility of role assignment for accountability. The sharing of progress charts for acknowledgment served as a motivating factor, leading to sustained adherence to the project goals without necessitating reminders in the final two weeks.

Results: This project proved to be highly successful as our process indicator steadily increased and remained above the target for 4 consecutive weeks.

Conclusion: Our results underscore the importance of patience and teamwork in achieving project objectives. It serves as a good example of the efficiency of simple and cost-effective interventions, one that can be replicated and implemented in other EDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善急诊科心肺复苏术(CPR)的角色分配:质量改进项目。
导言:在任何医疗环境中,心肺复苏(CPR)都是一项艰巨而混乱的复苏工作。急诊科(ED)见证了大量的心肺复苏。鉴于心肺复苏术的关键性质,仅靠内容知识和程序技能无法提供最佳护理。有效的团队合作,辅以协调良好的应对措施,对实现良好的病人预后至关重要。在我们的急诊室进行的一项调查显示,虽然大多数员工都认识到团队合作在心肺复苏中的重要性,并了解用于分配团队角色的白板,但只有 19% 的员工熟悉他们在心肺复苏中的个人角色:为了弥补这一差距,我们的项目旨在两个月内将心肺复苏的角色分配从 19% 提高到 80%。我们组建了一个跨专业团队,通过四个计划-实施-研究-行动周期来实施策略。干预措施包括加强宣传、创建简化的团队角色分配格式,以及委托每个班次的护理组长负责角色分配的责任。分享进度表以获得认可是一个激励因素,从而使项目目标得以持续实现,而无需在最后两周进行提醒:结果:事实证明,这个项目非常成功,我们的过程指标稳步上升,并连续 4 周保持在目标之上:我们的成果强调了耐心和团队合作对实现项目目标的重要性。该项目是一个很好的例子,说明了简单而经济有效的干预措施的效率,可以在其他急诊室复制和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1