Analytical validation of the LungLB test: a 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03280-7
Michelle L Lutman, Daniel Gramajo-Leventon, Shahram Tahvilian, Lara Baden, Courtney L Gilbert, Michael Trejo, Eric Vail, Michael J Donovan, Benjamin A Katchman, Paul C Pagano
{"title":"Analytical validation of the LungLB test: a 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.","authors":"Michelle L Lutman, Daniel Gramajo-Leventon, Shahram Tahvilian, Lara Baden, Courtney L Gilbert, Michael Trejo, Eric Vail, Michael J Donovan, Benjamin A Katchman, Paul C Pagano","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03280-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) often creates a diagnostic conundrum which may delay the early detection of lung cancer. Rare circulating genetically abnormal cells (CGAC) have previously demonstrated utility as a biomarker for discriminating benign from malignant small IPNs in the LungLB assay. CGAC are identified using a unique 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay and are thought to reflect early cell-based events in lung cancer pathogenesis and the anti-tumor immune response. LungLB is a prognostic tool that combines the CGAC biomarker and clinical features to aid in IPN evaluation by improving the stratification of patient risk of malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Herein we describe the analytical performance of the LungLB blood test. Analytical validation was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with adaptations for rare cell-based assays. Multiple operators, reagent lots, and assay runs were tested to examine accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and interfering factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FISH probes used in the LungLB assay demonstrate 100% sensitivity and specificity for their intended chromosomal loci (3q29, 3p22.1, 10q22.3 and 10cen). LungLB demonstrates analytical sensitivity of 10 CGAC per 10,000 lymphocytes analyzed, 100% analytical specificity, and high linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9971). Within run measurements across 100 samples demonstrated 96% reproducibility. Interfering factors normally found in blood (lipemia, biotin) and exposure to adverse temperatures (-20ºC or 37ºC) did not interfere with results. Sample stability was validated to 96 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analytical performance of LungLB in this validation study successfully demonstrates it is robust and suitable for everyday clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03280-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) often creates a diagnostic conundrum which may delay the early detection of lung cancer. Rare circulating genetically abnormal cells (CGAC) have previously demonstrated utility as a biomarker for discriminating benign from malignant small IPNs in the LungLB assay. CGAC are identified using a unique 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay and are thought to reflect early cell-based events in lung cancer pathogenesis and the anti-tumor immune response. LungLB is a prognostic tool that combines the CGAC biomarker and clinical features to aid in IPN evaluation by improving the stratification of patient risk of malignancy.

Methods: Herein we describe the analytical performance of the LungLB blood test. Analytical validation was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with adaptations for rare cell-based assays. Multiple operators, reagent lots, and assay runs were tested to examine accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and interfering factors.

Results: The FISH probes used in the LungLB assay demonstrate 100% sensitivity and specificity for their intended chromosomal loci (3q29, 3p22.1, 10q22.3 and 10cen). LungLB demonstrates analytical sensitivity of 10 CGAC per 10,000 lymphocytes analyzed, 100% analytical specificity, and high linearity (R2 = 0.9971). Within run measurements across 100 samples demonstrated 96% reproducibility. Interfering factors normally found in blood (lipemia, biotin) and exposure to adverse temperatures (-20ºC or 37ºC) did not interfere with results. Sample stability was validated to 96 hours.

Conclusion: The analytical performance of LungLB in this validation study successfully demonstrates it is robust and suitable for everyday clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LungLB 检验的分析验证:用于评估不确定肺结节的四色荧光原位杂交检验。
背景:对不确定肺结节(IPNs)的评估往往会造成诊断难题,可能会延误肺癌的早期发现。稀有循环基因异常细胞(CGAC)曾在 LungLB 检测中被证明是区分良性和恶性小 IPN 的生物标记物。CGAC是通过一种独特的四色荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测方法鉴定出来的,被认为能反映肺癌发病过程中的早期细胞事件和抗肿瘤免疫反应。LungLB 是一种预后工具,它结合了 CGAC 生物标记物和临床特征,通过改善患者恶性肿瘤风险分层来帮助 IPN 评估。分析验证是根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指南进行的,并针对基于稀有细胞的检测进行了调整。对多个操作者、试剂批次和化验运行进行了测试,以检查准确度、精确度、再现性和干扰因素:结果:LungLB 检测中使用的 FISH 探针对其目标染色体位点(3q29、3p22.1、10q22.3 和 10cen)具有 100% 的灵敏度和特异性。LungLB 分析灵敏度为每 10,000 个淋巴细胞分析 10 个 CGAC,特异性为 100%,线性度高(R2 = 0.9971)。对 100 份样本进行的运行内测量显示,重现性高达 96%。血液中通常存在的干扰因素(脂血症、生物素)和暴露在不利温度下(-20ºC 或 37ºC)都不会干扰结果。样品的稳定性经验证可达 96 小时:在这项验证研究中,LungLB 的分析性能成功地证明了它的稳健性,适合日常临床使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Establishment of seven lung ultrasound phenotypes: a retrospective observational study of an LUS registry. Expanding horizons: lung transplantation for non-IPF interstitial lung diseases. The first Japanese case of autosomal dominant cutis laxa with a frameshift mutation in exon 30 of the elastin gene complicated by small airway disease with 8 years of follow-up. Health-related quality of life measured with K-BILD is associated with survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Advantages of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis patients with suspected pulmonary infection as a rule-out tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1