Correlation between ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy and thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078173
Yaopu Qi, Xiuhuan Wang, Tai Guo, Tiebin You, Ping Wang
{"title":"Correlation between ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy and thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yaopu Qi, Xiuhuan Wang, Tai Guo, Tiebin You, Ping Wang","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main adjuvant therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. We aimed to compare differences in the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) among different treatment options.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases before 10 June 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included published randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving comparisons of treatments between chemotherapy and ALK-TKI drugs.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Assessed risk bias with Cochrane tool. Conducted NMA with GEMTC in R, we evaluate the model fit using the deviation information criteria. Estimated posterior distribution using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 4 chains, 10 fine-tuned iterations, 10 000 iterations per chain, total 50 000 iterations. Monitored potential scale reduction factor for convergence. And checked convergence with Gelman-Rubin statistics and trace plot. Provided surface under the cumulative ranking, lower values indicate less TE event probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of eight RCTs showed that, compared with that for crizotinib, there was a lower risk of total TE with chemotherapy (OR, 0.28; 95% credible intervals (CrI) 0.11 to 0.63), brigatinib (OR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.79) and ceritinib (OR 0.13; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.45). In addition, analysis of venous TE (VTE) showed similar results, with a lower occurrence for chemotherapy (OR 0.27; 95% CrI 0.1 to 0.62), brigatinib (OR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.6) and ceritinib (OR 0.1; 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.43) compared with that for crizotinib. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of arterial TE among the different treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with chemotherapy, alectinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and ceritinib, crizotinib significantly increased the risk of TE and VTE.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023373307.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"e078173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main adjuvant therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. We aimed to compare differences in the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) among different treatment options.

Design: Using a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases before 10 June 2023.

Eligibility criteria: We included published randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving comparisons of treatments between chemotherapy and ALK-TKI drugs.

Data extraction and synthesis: Assessed risk bias with Cochrane tool. Conducted NMA with GEMTC in R, we evaluate the model fit using the deviation information criteria. Estimated posterior distribution using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 4 chains, 10 fine-tuned iterations, 10 000 iterations per chain, total 50 000 iterations. Monitored potential scale reduction factor for convergence. And checked convergence with Gelman-Rubin statistics and trace plot. Provided surface under the cumulative ranking, lower values indicate less TE event probability.

Results: Analysis of eight RCTs showed that, compared with that for crizotinib, there was a lower risk of total TE with chemotherapy (OR, 0.28; 95% credible intervals (CrI) 0.11 to 0.63), brigatinib (OR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.79) and ceritinib (OR 0.13; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.45). In addition, analysis of venous TE (VTE) showed similar results, with a lower occurrence for chemotherapy (OR 0.27; 95% CrI 0.1 to 0.62), brigatinib (OR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.6) and ceritinib (OR 0.1; 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.43) compared with that for crizotinib. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of arterial TE among the different treatment options.

Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, alectinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and ceritinib, crizotinib significantly increased the risk of TE and VTE.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023373307.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ALK+非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗与血栓形成之间的相关性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的:无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌的主要辅助疗法包括ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和化疗。我们旨在比较不同治疗方案中血栓栓塞症(TE)发生率的差异:采用系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA):我们检索了 2023 年 6 月 10 日前的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Web of Science 数据库:我们纳入了已发表的涉及化疗和ALK-TKI药物治疗比较的随机对照试验(RCT):使用 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险。使用 R 中的 GEMTC 进行 NMA,使用偏差信息标准评估模型拟合度。使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(Markov Chain Monte Carlo)估计后验分布,4 个链,10 次微调迭代,每个链 10 000 次迭代,共 50 000 次迭代。监控潜在的缩放因子,以确保收敛性。并通过 Gelman-Rubin 统计和轨迹图检查收敛性。提供累积排名下的曲面,数值越低,表示 TE 事件概率越小:对 8 项研究的分析表明,与克唑替尼相比,化疗(OR,0.28;95% 可信区间(CrI)0.11 至 0.63)、布瑞加替尼(OR 0.31;95% CrI 0.11 至 0.79)和塞瑞替尼(OR 0.13;95% CrI 0.03 至 0.45)的总 TE 风险较低。此外,对静脉TE(VTE)的分析显示了相似的结果,与克唑替尼相比,化疗(OR 0.27;95% CrI 0.1至0.62)、布瑞加替尼(OR 0.18;95% CrI 0.04至0.6)和色瑞替尼(OR 0.1;95% CrI 0.02至0.43)的发生率较低。不同治疗方案的动脉TE发生率无明显差异:结论:与化疗、阿来替尼、洛拉替尼、布瑞替尼和塞瑞替尼相比,克唑替尼会显著增加TE和VTE的风险:CRD42023373307。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of periodontal therapy in preventing tooth loss and improving masticatory function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial in China. Exploring collaboration preferences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatment decision making in severe asthma: a qualitative study in The Netherlands. General practitioner confidence and practices in oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation in Australia: findings from a cross-sectional study. Mapping the landscape of concept analysis in nursing and auditing reporting completeness: a scoping review protocol. LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1