A qualitative study which aims to explore the factors influencing the delivery of both theory and practice of contraception and sexual health on pre-registration midwifery programmes in England.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202293
Claire Cousins, Gillian Matthews, Lesley Regan, Edward Mullins
{"title":"A qualitative study which aims to explore the factors influencing the delivery of both theory and practice of contraception and sexual health on pre-registration midwifery programmes in England.","authors":"Claire Cousins, Gillian Matthews, Lesley Regan, Edward Mullins","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy offers an opportunity to provide equitable access to contraception information and provision, and professional bodies advocate provision of contraception in the immediate postpartum period. This study examines the contribution of pre-registration midwifery education in preparing student midwives for this aspect of their role.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Nine lecturers from pre-registration midwifery programmes representing nine universities in England were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is minimal contraception and sexual health content on pre-registration midwifery programmes; however, specialist lecturers enhance the learning experience. Talking about sex may be difficult, particularly for younger students. Student midwives observe little discussion/provision of contraception in practice and are unlikely to consider it part of a midwife's role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A formally assessed national standard of knowledge on pre-registration programmes would be helpful, and this needs to be reflected in practice to become embedded. Institutional investment and commitment to continuous practice development is needed for all midwives. Practice placements in sexual and reproductive health clinics or abortion services may be beneficial to student midwives.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy offers an opportunity to provide equitable access to contraception information and provision, and professional bodies advocate provision of contraception in the immediate postpartum period. This study examines the contribution of pre-registration midwifery education in preparing student midwives for this aspect of their role.

Method: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Nine lecturers from pre-registration midwifery programmes representing nine universities in England were interviewed.

Results: There is minimal contraception and sexual health content on pre-registration midwifery programmes; however, specialist lecturers enhance the learning experience. Talking about sex may be difficult, particularly for younger students. Student midwives observe little discussion/provision of contraception in practice and are unlikely to consider it part of a midwife's role.

Conclusions: A formally assessed national standard of knowledge on pre-registration programmes would be helpful, and this needs to be reflected in practice to become embedded. Institutional investment and commitment to continuous practice development is needed for all midwives. Practice placements in sexual and reproductive health clinics or abortion services may be beneficial to student midwives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是一项定性研究,旨在探讨影响英格兰注册前助产士课程中避孕和性健康理论与实践教学的因素。
背景:怀孕提供了一个公平获取避孕信息和提供避孕药具的机会,专业机构提倡在产后立即提供避孕药具。本研究探讨了助产士注册前教育在帮助助产士学生做好这方面准备方面所起的作用:方法:采用半结构式访谈进行定性研究。对访谈进行记录、转录,并使用主题分析法进行分析。代表英格兰九所大学的九名注册前助产士课程讲师接受了访谈:注册前助产士课程中有关避孕和性健康的内容极少;不过,专业讲师能增强学习体验。谈论性问题可能比较困难,尤其是对于年龄较小的学生。学生助产士在实践中很少看到关于避孕的讨论/提供,也不太可能将其视为助产士职责的一部分:结论:在注册前课程中正式评估国家知识标准将有所帮助,这需要在实践中得到体现,才能深入人心。所有助产士都需要对持续的实践发展进行机构投资和承诺。在性与生殖健康诊所或人工流产服务机构实习可能对助产士学生有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
期刊最新文献
Shifting discourses, changing interests? How the language of sexual and reproductive health has evolved in the past 50 years. "That's not how abortions happen": a qualitative study exploring how young adults navigate abortion misinformation in the post-Roe era. Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain: cross-sectional survey data from the SACHA Study. Reported side effects from hormonal contraceptives among those seeking abortion care versus contraceptive services. The post-Roe potential of mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1