Response to: Letter regarding ‘Management of serotonin syndrome (toxicity)’

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16261
Angela L. Chiew, Geoffrey K. Isbister
{"title":"Response to: Letter regarding ‘Management of serotonin syndrome (toxicity)’","authors":"Angela L. Chiew,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. Isbister","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Mullins et al for your letter regarding our review article on the management of serotonin toxicity.<span><sup>1</sup></span> While your insights are valuable, we must clarify our stance on the use of cyproheptadine, particularly in the context of mild serotonin toxicity. We agree that the cornerstone of managing severe serotonin toxicity lies not in the administration of an ‘antidote’ but in providing effective early resuscitative and supportive care.</p><p>It is important to note that the pathophysiology of serotonin toxicity is complex, with at least seven families of 5-HT receptors and no single receptor being solely responsible for serotonin toxicity. However, the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors have been primarily implicated in serotonin toxicity.<span><sup>2</sup></span> 5-HT1A has a higher affinity for serotonin than 5-HT2A receptors, and as serotonin concentrations increase, 5-HT2A activation leads to more severe toxicity. What is still unclear is the extent of serotonin antagonism after a single dose of cyproheptadine, degree of antagonism at 5HT1A and 5HT2A receptors and the time of onset of this antagonism. Furthermore, the percentage of 5-HT blockade required to alleviate symptoms is unknown. The brief letter to the editor by Kapur, which Mullins et al reference, discusses the use of 18F-setoperone positron emission tomography (PET) in two healthy volunteers, one receiving cyproheptadine 4 mg and the other 6 mg 8 hourly for 6 days.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This report of two patients demonstrated that cyproheptadine could block 85%–95% of 5HT2 receptors in the prefrontal cortex after 6 days of treatment.<span><sup>3</sup></span> No data are provided after a single dose or even after 24 h of treatment.</p><p>We do not dismiss cyproheptadine as a treatment option for mild serotonin toxicity; rather, we emphasize that there is no strong evidence that cyproheptadine results in better or faster symptom resolution compared to benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines are commonly administered to manage anxiety, agitation and other toxidromes, including sympathomimetic and anticholinergic toxicity, so clinicians are familiar with their use in neurotoxic syndromes. In our clinical practice, patients with mild serotonin toxicity typically respond well to small doses of diazepam (5–10 mg) and can be safely discharged.</p><p>Oral diazepam has a rapid onset of action within an hour, compared to cyproheptadine with an onset of 2–3 h and peak concentrations at 4 h.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Relying on cyproheptadine could delay treatment, particularly if not readily available. Assertions of its rapid efficacy lack empirical support and are inconsistent with its pharmacokinetic profile.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16261","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Mullins et al for your letter regarding our review article on the management of serotonin toxicity.1 While your insights are valuable, we must clarify our stance on the use of cyproheptadine, particularly in the context of mild serotonin toxicity. We agree that the cornerstone of managing severe serotonin toxicity lies not in the administration of an ‘antidote’ but in providing effective early resuscitative and supportive care.

It is important to note that the pathophysiology of serotonin toxicity is complex, with at least seven families of 5-HT receptors and no single receptor being solely responsible for serotonin toxicity. However, the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors have been primarily implicated in serotonin toxicity.2 5-HT1A has a higher affinity for serotonin than 5-HT2A receptors, and as serotonin concentrations increase, 5-HT2A activation leads to more severe toxicity. What is still unclear is the extent of serotonin antagonism after a single dose of cyproheptadine, degree of antagonism at 5HT1A and 5HT2A receptors and the time of onset of this antagonism. Furthermore, the percentage of 5-HT blockade required to alleviate symptoms is unknown. The brief letter to the editor by Kapur, which Mullins et al reference, discusses the use of 18F-setoperone positron emission tomography (PET) in two healthy volunteers, one receiving cyproheptadine 4 mg and the other 6 mg 8 hourly for 6 days.3 This report of two patients demonstrated that cyproheptadine could block 85%–95% of 5HT2 receptors in the prefrontal cortex after 6 days of treatment.3 No data are provided after a single dose or even after 24 h of treatment.

We do not dismiss cyproheptadine as a treatment option for mild serotonin toxicity; rather, we emphasize that there is no strong evidence that cyproheptadine results in better or faster symptom resolution compared to benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines are commonly administered to manage anxiety, agitation and other toxidromes, including sympathomimetic and anticholinergic toxicity, so clinicians are familiar with their use in neurotoxic syndromes. In our clinical practice, patients with mild serotonin toxicity typically respond well to small doses of diazepam (5–10 mg) and can be safely discharged.

Oral diazepam has a rapid onset of action within an hour, compared to cyproheptadine with an onset of 2–3 h and peak concentrations at 4 h.4 Relying on cyproheptadine could delay treatment, particularly if not readily available. Assertions of its rapid efficacy lack empirical support and are inconsistent with its pharmacokinetic profile.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回应:关于 "血清素综合征(毒性)的管理 "的信件。
我们感谢Mullins等人对我们关于血清素毒性管理的综述文章的来信虽然您的见解很有价值,但我们必须澄清我们对使用赛庚胺的立场,特别是在轻度血清素毒性的情况下。我们一致认为,管理严重血清素毒性的基石不在于“解毒剂”的管理,而在于提供有效的早期复苏和支持性护理。值得注意的是,5-羟色胺毒性的病理生理是复杂的,至少有7个5-羟色胺受体家族,没有一个受体单独负责5-羟色胺毒性。然而,5-HT1A和5-HT2A受体主要与血清素毒性有关。与5-HT2A受体相比,5-HT1A对5-羟色胺具有更高的亲和力,随着5-HT2A浓度的增加,5-HT2A的激活会导致更严重的毒性。目前尚不清楚的是,单剂量赛庚啶后血清素的拮抗程度、对5HT1A和5HT2A受体的拮抗程度以及这种拮抗的发生时间。此外,缓解症状所需的5-羟色胺阻断剂的百分比尚不清楚。Kapur给编辑的简短信件,Mullins等人参考,讨论了在两名健康志愿者中使用18F-setoperone正电子发射断层扫描(PET),一名接受4mg赛庚啶,另一名接受6mg赛庚啶,每小时8次,持续6天这两例患者的报告表明,在治疗6天后,赛庚啶可以阻断前额皮质85%-95%的5HT2受体单次给药后甚至治疗24小时后均未提供数据。我们不排除赛庚啶作为轻度血清素毒性的治疗选择;相反,我们强调,没有强有力的证据表明,与苯二氮卓类药物相比,赛庚胺能更好或更快地缓解症状。苯二氮卓类药物通常用于治疗焦虑、躁动和其他毒副反应,包括拟交感神经和抗胆碱能毒性,因此临床医生熟悉它们在神经毒性综合征中的应用。在我们的临床实践中,轻度血清素毒性的患者通常对小剂量地西泮(5-10 mg)反应良好,可以安全出院。口服地西泮在1小时内起效迅速,而赛庚啶的起效时间为2-3小时,峰值浓度为4小时依赖赛庚啶可能会延迟治疗,特别是在不易获得的情况下。其快速疗效的断言缺乏经验支持,与其药代动力学特征不一致。作者无利益冲突需要申报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Integrating generative AI and genetic causal inference identifies metformin as a repurposing candidate for normal tension glaucoma. Paternal use of metformin and risk of major congenital malformations: A meta-analysis of 4 studies. Comment on revisiting the association between anticholinergic burden and frailty in people with HIV. Quantitative prediction of intravenous drug interactions caused by cytochromes P450 inhibitors and inducers. Psychotropic medication use among community dwellers with and without Parkinson's disease - A nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1