Role of prolonged packing in postoperative anorectal abscess management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 Print Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.008423
Dain Raina Kim, Kevin Verhoeff, Uzair Jogiat, Alex Miles, Janice Y Kung, Valentin Mocanu
{"title":"Role of prolonged packing in postoperative anorectal abscess management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dain Raina Kim, Kevin Verhoeff, Uzair Jogiat, Alex Miles, Janice Y Kung, Valentin Mocanu","doi":"10.1503/cjs.008423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged packing of anorectal abscess cavities with internal dressings after incision and drainage is frequently used, but the efficacy of this practice remains controversial. Some studies highlight its use in hemostasis and preventing fistula and abscess recurrence, whereas others describe its economic burden and increase in pain. In this systematic review, we examine current evidence on the impact of packing after incision and drainage for anorectal abscesses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical librarian conducted a comprehensive literature search on January 5, 2023. We conducted the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.1 software with a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 randomized controlled trials, comprising 490 patients. Of those, 241 patients (49%) received postoperative packing; most patients were male (<i>n</i> = 158, 65.6%), with a median age of 40.5 years and a follow-up of 6 months. Meta-analysis showed that prolonged wound packing was associated with delayed wound healing and increased pain, but no difference in abscess recurrence or fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this systematic review of current evidence highlighting the impact of packing after incision and drainage for anorectal abscesses, we found that the practice is not associated with significant differences in abscess recurrence and fistula formation, but is associated with increased postoperative pain and delayed wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 5","pages":"E329-E336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prolonged packing of anorectal abscess cavities with internal dressings after incision and drainage is frequently used, but the efficacy of this practice remains controversial. Some studies highlight its use in hemostasis and preventing fistula and abscess recurrence, whereas others describe its economic burden and increase in pain. In this systematic review, we examine current evidence on the impact of packing after incision and drainage for anorectal abscesses.

Methods: The medical librarian conducted a comprehensive literature search on January 5, 2023. We conducted the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.1 software with a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model.

Results: We identified 3 randomized controlled trials, comprising 490 patients. Of those, 241 patients (49%) received postoperative packing; most patients were male (n = 158, 65.6%), with a median age of 40.5 years and a follow-up of 6 months. Meta-analysis showed that prolonged wound packing was associated with delayed wound healing and increased pain, but no difference in abscess recurrence or fistula formation.

Conclusion: In this systematic review of current evidence highlighting the impact of packing after incision and drainage for anorectal abscesses, we found that the practice is not associated with significant differences in abscess recurrence and fistula formation, but is associated with increased postoperative pain and delayed wound healing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长时间填料在术后肛门直肠脓肿处理中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:肛门直肠脓肿切开引流后,经常使用内敷料对脓肿腔进行长时间包扎,但这种做法的效果仍存在争议。一些研究强调了其止血和预防瘘管及脓肿复发的作用,而另一些研究则描述了其经济负担和增加的疼痛。在这篇系统性综述中,我们研究了目前有关肛门直肠脓肿切开引流术后填料的影响的证据:医学图书管理员于 2023 年 1 月 5 日进行了全面的文献检索。我们使用 RevMan 5.4.1 软件和 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析:我们确定了 3 项随机对照试验,共涉及 490 名患者。其中,241 名患者(49%)接受了术后包扎;大多数患者为男性(n = 158,65.6%),中位年龄为 40.5 岁,随访时间为 6 个月。荟萃分析表明,长时间的伤口填塞与伤口愈合延迟和疼痛加剧有关,但在脓肿复发或瘘管形成方面没有差异:在这一系统性综述中,我们发现在肛门直肠脓肿切开引流术后进行伤口填塞与脓肿复发和瘘管形成的显著差异无关,但与术后疼痛加剧和伤口愈合延迟有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Canadian Spine Society: 24th Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, February 28 - Saturday, March 2, Fairmont Chateau Whistler, Whistler, B.C., Canada. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1