Selecting the Best Pharmacokinetic Models for a Priori Model-Informed Precision Dosing with Model Ensembling.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s40262-024-01425-9
Bram C Agema, Tolra Kocher, Ayşenur B Öztürk, Eline L Giraud, Nielka P van Erp, Brenda C M de Winter, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen, Birgit C P Koch, Sebastiaan D T Sassen
{"title":"Selecting the Best Pharmacokinetic Models for a Priori Model-Informed Precision Dosing with Model Ensembling.","authors":"Bram C Agema, Tolra Kocher, Ayşenur B Öztürk, Eline L Giraud, Nielka P van Erp, Brenda C M de Winter, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen, Birgit C P Koch, Sebastiaan D T Sassen","doi":"10.1007/s40262-024-01425-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>When utilizing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models for a priori dosage individualization, selecting the best model is crucial to obtain adequate doses. We developed and evaluated several model-selection and ensembling methods, using external evaluation on the basis of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples to identify the best (set of) models per patient for a priori dosage individualization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PK data and models describing both hospitalized patients (n = 134) receiving continuous vancomycin (26 models) and patients (n = 92) receiving imatinib in an outpatient setting (12 models) are included. Target attainment of four model-selection methods was compared with standard dosing: the best model based on external validation, uninformed model ensembling, model ensembling using a weighting scheme on the basis of covariate-stratified external evaluation, and model selection using covariates in decision trees that were subsequently ensembled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the use of PK models improved the proportion of patients exposed to concentrations within the therapeutic window for both cohorts. Relative improvement of proportion on target for best model, unweighted, weighted, and decision trees were - 7.0%, 2.3%, 11.4%, and 37.0% (vancomycin method-development); 23.2%, 7.9%, 15.6%, and, 77.2% (vancomycin validation); 40.7%, 50.0%, 59.5%, and 59.5% (imatinib method-development); and 19.0%, 28.5%, 38.0%, and 23.8% (imatinib validation), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best (set of) models per patient for a priori dosage individualization can be identified using a relatively small set of TDM samples as external evaluation. Adequately performing popPK models were identified while also excluding poor-performing models. Dose recommendations resulted in more patients within the therapeutic range for both vancomycin and imatinib. Prospective validation is necessary before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"1449-1461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01425-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: When utilizing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models for a priori dosage individualization, selecting the best model is crucial to obtain adequate doses. We developed and evaluated several model-selection and ensembling methods, using external evaluation on the basis of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples to identify the best (set of) models per patient for a priori dosage individualization.

Methods: PK data and models describing both hospitalized patients (n = 134) receiving continuous vancomycin (26 models) and patients (n = 92) receiving imatinib in an outpatient setting (12 models) are included. Target attainment of four model-selection methods was compared with standard dosing: the best model based on external validation, uninformed model ensembling, model ensembling using a weighting scheme on the basis of covariate-stratified external evaluation, and model selection using covariates in decision trees that were subsequently ensembled.

Results: Overall, the use of PK models improved the proportion of patients exposed to concentrations within the therapeutic window for both cohorts. Relative improvement of proportion on target for best model, unweighted, weighted, and decision trees were - 7.0%, 2.3%, 11.4%, and 37.0% (vancomycin method-development); 23.2%, 7.9%, 15.6%, and, 77.2% (vancomycin validation); 40.7%, 50.0%, 59.5%, and 59.5% (imatinib method-development); and 19.0%, 28.5%, 38.0%, and 23.8% (imatinib validation), respectively.

Conclusions: The best (set of) models per patient for a priori dosage individualization can be identified using a relatively small set of TDM samples as external evaluation. Adequately performing popPK models were identified while also excluding poor-performing models. Dose recommendations resulted in more patients within the therapeutic range for both vancomycin and imatinib. Prospective validation is necessary before clinical implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用模型组合为先验模型信息精确配药选择最佳药代动力学模型
背景和目的:在利用群体药代动力学(popPK)模型进行先验剂量个体化时,选择最佳模型是获得适当剂量的关键。我们开发并评估了几种模型选择和组合方法,在治疗药物监测(TDM)样本的基础上进行外部评估,以确定每个患者用于先验剂量个体化的最佳(一组)模型:方法:研究对象包括连续接受万古霉素治疗的住院患者(134 人)(26 个模型)和在门诊接受伊马替尼治疗的患者(92 人)(12 个模型)的 PK 数据和模型。比较了四种模型选择方法与标准剂量的目标实现情况:基于外部验证的最佳模型、无信息的模型组合、基于协变量分层外部评估的加权方案的模型组合,以及使用决策树中的协变量进行模型选择并随后进行组合:总体而言,使用 PK 模型提高了两个队列中暴露于治疗窗内浓度的患者比例。最佳模型、非加权模型、加权模型和决策树的达标比例的相对改善率分别为:7.0%、2.3%、11.4% 和 37.0%(万古霉素方法开发);23.2%、7.9%、15.6% 和 77.2%(万古霉素方法开发)。6%和 77.2%(万古霉素验证);40.7%、50.0%、59.5%和 59.5%(伊马替尼方法开发);19.0%、28.5%、38.0%和 23.8%(伊马替尼验证):结论:使用相对较少的一组 TDM 样本作为外部评估,可以确定每个患者先验剂量个体化的最佳(一组)模型。在排除性能较差的模型的同时,也确定了性能适当的 popPK 模型。剂量建议使更多患者的万古霉素和伊马替尼剂量处于治疗范围内。在临床应用之前,有必要进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetics of Tarlatamab, a Delta-Like Ligand-3 (DLL3) Targeted Half-Life Extended Bispecific T-Cell Engager (BiTE®) Immunotherapy in Adult Patients with Previously Treated Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results from DeLLphi-300, a Phase I Multiple-Dose-Escalation Study. Coupling Pre- and Postnatal Infant Exposures with Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Cumulative Maternal Levetiracetam Exposure During Breastfeeding. Pharmacokinetics of Omadacycline in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis. SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis. Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Paracetamol and Its Metabolites in Extreme Preterm Neonates in the Context of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1