Providing Emotional Support During the Process of Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis (PrEliMS): A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1177/02692155241284781
Roshan das Nair, Jacqueline R Mhizha-Murira, Gogem Topcu, Tierney Tindall, Clare Bale, Nima Moghaddam, Grit Scheffler-Ansari, Avril Drummond, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Nikos Evangelou
{"title":"Providing Emotional Support During the Process of Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis (PrEliMS): A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Roshan das Nair, Jacqueline R Mhizha-Murira, Gogem Topcu, Tierney Tindall, Clare Bale, Nima Moghaddam, Grit Scheffler-Ansari, Avril Drummond, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Nikos Evangelou","doi":"10.1177/02692155241284781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an emotional support programme for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three-arm, mixed methods, randomised controlled trial comparing usual care, versus usual care plus nurse-specialist support, versus usual care plus nurse-specialist support plus peer support.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Community-dwelling adults within two years of diagnosis <i>or</i> undergoing diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>PrEliMS involves information provision, emotional support, and strategies and techniques based on psychoeducation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy principles, supportive listening. One version of the intervention was provided by nurse-specialists alone and the other was provided by nurse-specialists plus peer support.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The main outcome of interest was the feasibility of proceeding to a definitive trial, exploring recruitment rate, acceptability, completion of outcome measures (perceived stress, mood, self-efficacy, psychological impact, and service use), and signal of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 40 participants randomised (mean age 36.2 years (SD = 14.8); 54% women; 85% with relapsing-remitting MS), 36 and 38 returned 3- and 6-month questionnaires, respectively. Participant interviews suggested the trial was largely feasible, and the intervention acceptable, with some amendments to trial procedures and intervention delivery noted. There were, however, no statistically significant differences between groups at followup for any measures, and effect-size estimates were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A definitive trial combining nurse-specialist and peer support adjustment to diagnosis intervention is warranted, but more work exploring the delivery and fidelity of the intervention is needed before this is pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241284781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an emotional support programme for newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis.

Design: Three-arm, mixed methods, randomised controlled trial comparing usual care, versus usual care plus nurse-specialist support, versus usual care plus nurse-specialist support plus peer support.

Participants: Community-dwelling adults within two years of diagnosis or undergoing diagnosis.

Interventions: PrEliMS involves information provision, emotional support, and strategies and techniques based on psychoeducation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy principles, supportive listening. One version of the intervention was provided by nurse-specialists alone and the other was provided by nurse-specialists plus peer support.

Main measures: The main outcome of interest was the feasibility of proceeding to a definitive trial, exploring recruitment rate, acceptability, completion of outcome measures (perceived stress, mood, self-efficacy, psychological impact, and service use), and signal of efficacy.

Results: Of 40 participants randomised (mean age 36.2 years (SD = 14.8); 54% women; 85% with relapsing-remitting MS), 36 and 38 returned 3- and 6-month questionnaires, respectively. Participant interviews suggested the trial was largely feasible, and the intervention acceptable, with some amendments to trial procedures and intervention delivery noted. There were, however, no statistically significant differences between groups at followup for any measures, and effect-size estimates were small.

Conclusion: A definitive trial combining nurse-specialist and peer support adjustment to diagnosis intervention is warranted, but more work exploring the delivery and fidelity of the intervention is needed before this is pursued.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多发性硬化症诊断过程中提供情感支持(PrEliMS):一项可行性随机对照试验。
目的:评估为新诊断的多发性硬化症患者提供情感支持计划的可行性和可接受性:评估为新确诊的多发性硬化症患者提供情感支持计划的可行性和可接受性:三臂、混合方法、随机对照试验,比较常规护理与常规护理加专业护士支持,以及常规护理加专业护士支持加同伴支持:干预措施:PrEliMS包括提供信息、情感支持以及基于心理教育、接受与承诺疗法原则和支持性倾听的策略和技巧。一种干预方式由专科护士单独提供,另一种干预方式由专科护士和同伴支持共同提供:主要关注结果是进行最终试验的可行性,探讨招募率、可接受性、结果测量(感知压力、情绪、自我效能、心理影响和服务使用)的完成情况以及疗效信号:40名随机参与者(平均年龄36.2岁(SD=14.8);54%为女性;85%为复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者)中,分别有36人和38人返回了3个月和6个月的问卷。对参与者的访谈表明,该试验基本可行,干预措施也可以接受,但试验程序和干预措施的实施需要进行一些修正。然而,在随访中,各组之间在任何指标上都没有统计学意义上的显著差异,效果大小估计值也很小:结论:将专科护士和同伴支持结合起来进行诊断调整干预的最终试验是有必要的,但在进行试验之前,还需要对干预的实施和忠实性进行更多的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Providing Emotional Support During the Process of Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis (PrEliMS): A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1