Evaluating treatment practices and challenges in systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a comprehensive survey analysis.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess current diagnostic and management for systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) among physicians, evaluate the challenges encountered in diagnosis and treatment, and identify the educational needs and professional development engagements of physicians managing sJIA.

Methods: A nationwide survey was conducted from November 2023 to March 2024 across tertiary and secondary pediatric and general hospitals in China. The survey targeted physicians with at least three years of specialty experience, resulting in 310 valid responses from 25 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities. The survey collected data on diagnostic practices, treatment approaches, and professional development related to sJIA. Data collection was facilitated through WeChat, and statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital, with informed consent provided electronically by participants.

Results: The survey indicated that all physicians encountered suspected or confirmed cases of sJIA, highlighting its prevalence and the diagnostic challenges associated. Regarding diagnostic standards, 53.9% of physicians used the "Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of sJIA and Macrophage Activation Syndrome," 18.1% followed the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) standards, and 24.8% adhered to the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) standards. In treatment strategies, glucocorticoids and IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies were extensively used, with the latter receiving "excellent" and "satisfactory" ratings of 46.5% and 36.1%, respectively, demonstrating high efficacy and acceptance. Main challenges included high treatment costs, complexity of diagnosis, patient compliance issues, and potential long-term side effects of biologics. Additionally, 126 doctors (40.7%) actively participated in more than three academic conferences or systematic learning courses related to sJIA, indicating a strong demand for ongoing education, particularly in new treatment developments and diagnostic skills.

Conclusion: The findings emphasize the necessity for standardized diagnosis and customized treatment plans tailored to patient-specific conditions in managing sJIA. Key Points • The survey highlights the prevalence and clinical challenges of sJIA among physicians, emphasizing the importance of vigilant diagnosis, multi-system involvement, and differential diagnosis to improve treatment outcomes and patient quality of life.