Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.17219/dmp/188369
Amanda Maria De Olveira Dal Piva, Hanna Verhoeff, Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, João Paulo Mendes Tribst
{"title":"Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate.","authors":"Amanda Maria De Olveira Dal Piva, Hanna Verhoeff, Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, João Paulo Mendes Tribst","doi":"10.17219/dmp/188369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of firing protocols are available for the IPS e.max lithium disilicate (LD) and can be used for new, 'advanced' LD (ALD). However, the impact of firing protocols on the optical properties of ALD is still unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the color difference (ΔE00), the translucency parameter (TP00) and the whiteness index for dentistry (WID) for both LD glass ceramics after the processes of firing/glazing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty disk-shaped specimens, with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1.2 mm, were fabricated from IPS e.max CAD (LD; Ivoclar) and another 50 from CEREC Tessera™ (ALD; Dentsply Sirona). The specimens from each group were further divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10) according to the firing/glazing protocol applied: crystallization (c); one-step crystallization and glazing (cg); crystallization and refiring (c-r); two-step crystallization and glazing (c-g); or long-firing crystallization (lfc). The ΔE00, TP00 and WID were assessed. The statistical analysis of ΔE00 was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test, while TP00 and WID were analyzed with the two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a statistical significance level of 0.05. The cg groups were designated as the reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANOVA showed that the firing procedures had no effect on ΔE00, TP00 and WID in the case of LD. In addition, LD exhibited greater translucency and brightness as compared to ALD. For ALD, all color changes observed in relation to the reference firing protocol were clinically unacceptable. The ALD specimens which underwent 1 standard firing cycle showed higher TP00 and WID values than other ALD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of the firing protocol has no impact on the color, TP00 or WID of LD. Additionally, LD presents higher WID values than ALD, irrespective of the firing protocol used. Alternative firing protocols result in clinically unacceptable color variations when compared to the manufacturer-recommended protocol for ALD. Advanced LD is more sensitive to different firing protocols with regard to its optical properties, which makes the workflow less predictable in comparison with LD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/188369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A variety of firing protocols are available for the IPS e.max lithium disilicate (LD) and can be used for new, 'advanced' LD (ALD). However, the impact of firing protocols on the optical properties of ALD is still unknown.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the color difference (ΔE00), the translucency parameter (TP00) and the whiteness index for dentistry (WID) for both LD glass ceramics after the processes of firing/glazing.

Material and methods: Fifty disk-shaped specimens, with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1.2 mm, were fabricated from IPS e.max CAD (LD; Ivoclar) and another 50 from CEREC Tessera™ (ALD; Dentsply Sirona). The specimens from each group were further divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10) according to the firing/glazing protocol applied: crystallization (c); one-step crystallization and glazing (cg); crystallization and refiring (c-r); two-step crystallization and glazing (c-g); or long-firing crystallization (lfc). The ΔE00, TP00 and WID were assessed. The statistical analysis of ΔE00 was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test, while TP00 and WID were analyzed with the two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a statistical significance level of 0.05. The cg groups were designated as the reference.

Results: The ANOVA showed that the firing procedures had no effect on ΔE00, TP00 and WID in the case of LD. In addition, LD exhibited greater translucency and brightness as compared to ALD. For ALD, all color changes observed in relation to the reference firing protocol were clinically unacceptable. The ALD specimens which underwent 1 standard firing cycle showed higher TP00 and WID values than other ALD groups.

Conclusions: The choice of the firing protocol has no impact on the color, TP00 or WID of LD. Additionally, LD presents higher WID values than ALD, irrespective of the firing protocol used. Alternative firing protocols result in clinically unacceptable color variations when compared to the manufacturer-recommended protocol for ALD. Advanced LD is more sensitive to different firing protocols with regard to its optical properties, which makes the workflow less predictable in comparison with LD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级二硅酸锂的光学特性。
背景:IPS e.max 二硅酸锂(LD)有多种烧结方案,可用于新型 "高级 "LD(ALD)。然而,焙烧方案对 ALD 光学特性的影响仍是未知数:本研究旨在评估两种 LD 玻璃陶瓷在烧制/上釉过程后的色差(ΔE00)、半透明参数(TP00)和牙科白度指数(WID):用 IPS e.max CAD(LD;Ivoclar)和 CEREC Tessera™(ALD;Dentsply Sirona)分别制作了 50 个直径为 10 毫米、厚度为 1.2 毫米的圆盘状试样。根据焙烧/上釉方案的不同,每组的试样又分为 5 个亚组(n = 10):结晶(c);一步结晶和上釉(cg);结晶和再焙烧(c-r);两步结晶和上釉(c-g);或长焙烧结晶(lfc)。对ΔE00、TP00 和 WID 进行了评估。ΔE00采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验进行统计分析,TP00和WID则采用双因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析,统计显著性水平为0.05。cg 组为参照组:方差分析结果表明,烧结程序对 LD 的 ΔE00、TP00 和 WID 没有影响。此外,与 ALD 相比,LD 的半透明度和亮度更高。对于 ALD,与参考焙烧方案相比观察到的所有颜色变化在临床上都是不可接受的。与其他 ALD 组相比,经过一个标准焙烧周期的 ALD 试样显示出更高的 TP00 和 WID 值:结论:焙烧方案的选择对 LD 的颜色、TP00 或 WID 没有影响。此外,无论采用哪种焙烧方案,LD 的 WID 值都高于 ALD。与制造商推荐的 ALD 烧结方案相比,其他烧结方案会导致临床上无法接受的色差。就其光学特性而言,高级 LD 对不同的焙烧方案更为敏感,这使得工作流程的可预测性低于 LD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Most common congenital syndromes with facial asymmetry: A narrative review. Self-assessment skills of undergraduate students in operative dentistry: Preclinical performance and gender. Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate. Studies on the content of toxic metals in teeth: A narrative review of literature. Kinesio Taping as an alternative therapy for limited mandibular mobility with pain in female patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1