Cezar Tiberiu Diaconu, Lelia Mihaela Gheorghiță, Anca Elena Diaconu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Alexandru Gliga, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Iulia Roxana Marinescu, Marina Olimpia Amărăscu, Oana Andreea Diaconu
{"title":"Current Endodontic Practices among Romanian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Cezar Tiberiu Diaconu, Lelia Mihaela Gheorghiță, Anca Elena Diaconu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Alexandru Gliga, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Iulia Roxana Marinescu, Marina Olimpia Amărăscu, Oana Andreea Diaconu","doi":"10.3390/dj12090283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Root canal therapy (RCT) is usually performed in Romania by general dentists (GDPs) because they are more readily available and more reasonably priced than endodontists. Concerns have been raised about the quality of RCTs performed by GDPs, possibly due to insufficient equipment or knowledge; therefore, this study aims to investigate current endodontic practices in Romania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted via a questionnaire distributed to 400 randomly selected Romanian dentists, with 285 fully validated completed responses (71.25% response rate). Respondents were grouped by speciality, and statistical analysis, including cross-tabulation and the χ<sup>2</sup> (chi-square) test, was used, with a significance level set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 for all tests. Results: Significant differences were found in the use of magnification, rubber dam, sodium hypochlorite concentration, and bioceramics (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in preferences for measuring working length (<i>p</i> = 0.166) or rotary instrument motion (<i>p</i> = 0.289). Approximately 6% of the respondents used laser technology with no significant difference across specialities (<i>p</i> = 0.571). Additionally, 77.9% preferred using sodium hypochlorite, with no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.006) regarding concentration. <i>Conclusions</i>: Most participants, including GDPs, use modern equipment and techniques during RCT, indicating their awareness and competence in current endodontic practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12090283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Root canal therapy (RCT) is usually performed in Romania by general dentists (GDPs) because they are more readily available and more reasonably priced than endodontists. Concerns have been raised about the quality of RCTs performed by GDPs, possibly due to insufficient equipment or knowledge; therefore, this study aims to investigate current endodontic practices in Romania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted via a questionnaire distributed to 400 randomly selected Romanian dentists, with 285 fully validated completed responses (71.25% response rate). Respondents were grouped by speciality, and statistical analysis, including cross-tabulation and the χ2 (chi-square) test, was used, with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05 for all tests. Results: Significant differences were found in the use of magnification, rubber dam, sodium hypochlorite concentration, and bioceramics (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in preferences for measuring working length (p = 0.166) or rotary instrument motion (p = 0.289). Approximately 6% of the respondents used laser technology with no significant difference across specialities (p = 0.571). Additionally, 77.9% preferred using sodium hypochlorite, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.006) regarding concentration. Conclusions: Most participants, including GDPs, use modern equipment and techniques during RCT, indicating their awareness and competence in current endodontic practices.