Evaluation of General Anesthesia and Sedation and Follow-Up Compliance in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Comprehensive Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Gender Differences.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.3390/dj12090277
Maria Sarapultseva, Alexey Sarapultsev
{"title":"Evaluation of General Anesthesia and Sedation and Follow-Up Compliance in Pediatric Dental Procedures: A Comprehensive Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Gender Differences.","authors":"Maria Sarapultseva, Alexey Sarapultsev","doi":"10.3390/dj12090277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of different types of general anesthesia (GA) and sedation in pediatric dental procedures, focusing on treatment outcomes and follow-up compliance with an emphasis on gender differences. Clinical records of 1582 pediatric patients, aged 0-18 years, were analyzed to examine the distribution, duration and impact of anesthesia types on dental procedure complexity. The study population was divided into three age groups: 0-6, 7-12 and 13-18 years. We assessed follow-up attendance rates by gender and anesthesia type, calculated the decayed, missing and filled (DMF) index and evaluated the need for further treatment and reasons for retreatment. Our findings indicated that general anesthesia with inhalational agents and muscle relaxants was the most frequently used method (1260 instances), followed by nitrous oxide sedation (163 instances) and sevoflurane GA with a laryngeal mask airway (158 instances). Inhalational GA with muscle relaxants had the longest average duration (2.78 h) and the highest DMF index (7.43), reflecting its use in more severe dental conditions. Gender analysis revealed a slight male predominance in using inhalational GA with muscle relaxants (55.87% male vs. 44.13% female). Female patients demonstrated higher follow-up compliance across all periods. Overall, our results highlight the importance of tailored anesthesia and sedation plans, as well as follow-up protocols, in pediatric dentistry. This study provides valuable insights for practitioners in selecting appropriate anesthesia and sedation types and developing strategies to improve follow-up compliance and treatment success.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12090277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of different types of general anesthesia (GA) and sedation in pediatric dental procedures, focusing on treatment outcomes and follow-up compliance with an emphasis on gender differences. Clinical records of 1582 pediatric patients, aged 0-18 years, were analyzed to examine the distribution, duration and impact of anesthesia types on dental procedure complexity. The study population was divided into three age groups: 0-6, 7-12 and 13-18 years. We assessed follow-up attendance rates by gender and anesthesia type, calculated the decayed, missing and filled (DMF) index and evaluated the need for further treatment and reasons for retreatment. Our findings indicated that general anesthesia with inhalational agents and muscle relaxants was the most frequently used method (1260 instances), followed by nitrous oxide sedation (163 instances) and sevoflurane GA with a laryngeal mask airway (158 instances). Inhalational GA with muscle relaxants had the longest average duration (2.78 h) and the highest DMF index (7.43), reflecting its use in more severe dental conditions. Gender analysis revealed a slight male predominance in using inhalational GA with muscle relaxants (55.87% male vs. 44.13% female). Female patients demonstrated higher follow-up compliance across all periods. Overall, our results highlight the importance of tailored anesthesia and sedation plans, as well as follow-up protocols, in pediatric dentistry. This study provides valuable insights for practitioners in selecting appropriate anesthesia and sedation types and developing strategies to improve follow-up compliance and treatment success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿童牙科手术中的全身麻醉和镇静以及随访依从性:全面分析长期结果和性别差异。
这项回顾性研究评估了不同类型的全身麻醉(GA)和镇静剂在儿童牙科手术中的效果,重点关注治疗效果和随访依从性,并强调了性别差异。研究分析了 1582 名 0-18 岁儿童患者的临床记录,以研究麻醉类型的分布、持续时间和对牙科手术复杂性的影响。研究对象分为三个年龄组:0-6 岁、7-12 岁和 13-18 岁。我们按性别和麻醉类型评估了复诊率,计算了蛀牙、缺失牙和填充牙(DMF)指数,并评估了进一步治疗的需要和再治疗的原因。我们的研究结果表明,使用吸入剂和肌肉松弛剂的全身麻醉是最常用的方法(1260 例),其次是氧化亚氮镇静(163 例)和使用喉罩气道的七氟醚全身麻醉(158 例)。使用肌肉松弛剂的吸入式镇静剂的平均持续时间最长(2.78 小时),DMF 指数最高(7.43),这反映出它用于更严重的牙科疾病。性别分析显示,使用肌肉松弛剂吸入 GA 的男性略占多数(55.87% 为男性,44.13% 为女性)。女性患者在各个时期的随访依从性都较高。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了量身定制的麻醉和镇静计划以及随访方案在儿童牙科中的重要性。这项研究为从业人员选择合适的麻醉和镇静类型以及制定提高随访依从性和治疗成功率的策略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine as a Potential Mediator in the Association between Periodontitis and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. Effect of a Novel Ergonomic Sheath on Dental Device-Related Muscle Work, Fatigue and Comfort-A Pilot Clinical Study. Evaluating Treatment Modalities for Reducing Recurrence in Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A Narrative Review. Influence of Direct Coronal Restoration Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars: An In Vitro Study. Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1