In Vitro Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Propolis, and Calcium Hydroxide Effect on Lipoteichoic-Acid-Induced Proinflammatory Cytokines Production.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.3390/dj12090286
Luciane Dias de Oliveira, Lara Steffany de Carvalho, Ana Claudia Carvalho Xavier, Felipe Eduardo de Oliveira, Mariella Vieira Pereira Leão, Mariana Gadelho Gimenez Diamantino, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Marcia Carneiro Valera, Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho, Amjad Abu Hasna
{"title":"In Vitro Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Propolis, and Calcium Hydroxide Effect on Lipoteichoic-Acid-Induced Proinflammatory Cytokines Production.","authors":"Luciane Dias de Oliveira, Lara Steffany de Carvalho, Ana Claudia Carvalho Xavier, Felipe Eduardo de Oliveira, Mariella Vieira Pereira Leão, Mariana Gadelho Gimenez Diamantino, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Marcia Carneiro Valera, Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho, Amjad Abu Hasna","doi":"10.3390/dj12090286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine (CHX), and the glycolic extract of propolis (GEP) as endodontic irrigants and of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>], CHX, or Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> + CHX as intracanal medications on the capacity of the lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> in macrophages' proinflammatory cytokines production. Freshly extracted 108 human single-rooted teeth were used in this study. The LTA of <i>E. faecalis</i> was standardized in double-distilled pyrogen-free water (250 µg/mL) and inoculated into the specimens subdivided into nine subgroups (n = 12). Cultures of murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) were treated with 30 µL of each sample collected from root canals and incubated (37 °C, 5% CO<sub>2</sub>) for 24 h. Lastly, anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-6, anti-IP-10, anti-MIP-1α, anti-G-CSF, and anti-IL-1β DuoSet kits were used to perform an ELISA assay. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05). It was found that 1% NaOCl was the most effective irrigant in reducing the capacity of LTA in cytokines production, followed by 12% GEP and 2% CHX, respectively. Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> + CHX presented the best results when associated with NaOCl or GEP. Thus, NaOCl or GEP associated with Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> + CHX were effective in reducing the capacity of LTA in different macrophages pro-inflammatory cytokines production.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12090286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine (CHX), and the glycolic extract of propolis (GEP) as endodontic irrigants and of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2], CHX, or Ca(OH)2 + CHX as intracanal medications on the capacity of the lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Enterococcus faecalis in macrophages' proinflammatory cytokines production. Freshly extracted 108 human single-rooted teeth were used in this study. The LTA of E. faecalis was standardized in double-distilled pyrogen-free water (250 µg/mL) and inoculated into the specimens subdivided into nine subgroups (n = 12). Cultures of murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) were treated with 30 µL of each sample collected from root canals and incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2) for 24 h. Lastly, anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-6, anti-IP-10, anti-MIP-1α, anti-G-CSF, and anti-IL-1β DuoSet kits were used to perform an ELISA assay. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p ≥ 0.05). It was found that 1% NaOCl was the most effective irrigant in reducing the capacity of LTA in cytokines production, followed by 12% GEP and 2% CHX, respectively. Ca(OH)2 + CHX presented the best results when associated with NaOCl or GEP. Thus, NaOCl or GEP associated with Ca(OH)2 + CHX were effective in reducing the capacity of LTA in different macrophages pro-inflammatory cytokines production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外评估次氯酸钠、洗必泰、蜂胶和氢氧化钙对脂肪胞嘧啶酸诱导的前炎细胞因子产生的影响
本研究旨在评估次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、洗必泰(CHX)和蜂胶乙醇提取物(GEP)作为牙髓冲洗剂以及氢氧化钙[Ca(OH)2]、CHX或Ca(OH)2 + CHX作为牙髓内药物对粪肠球菌的脂联素(LTA)在巨噬细胞中产生促炎细胞因子能力的影响。本研究使用了新鲜拔出的 108 颗人类单根牙。粪肠球菌的 LTA 在双蒸馏无热原水中标准化(250 µg/mL),并接种到细分为九个亚组(n = 12)的标本中。最后,使用抗 TNF-α、抗 IL-6、抗 IP-10、抗 MIP-1α、抗 G-CSF 和抗 IL-1β DuoSet 试剂盒进行 ELISA 检测。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(p ≥ 0.05)。结果发现,1% NaOCl 是降低 LTA 细胞因子产生能力最有效的灌流剂,其次分别是 12% GEP 和 2% CHX。当 Ca(OH)2 + CHX 与 NaOCl 或 GEP 联用时,效果最好。因此,NaOCl 或 GEP 与 Ca(OH)2 + CHX 联用可有效降低 LTA 在不同巨噬细胞中产生促炎细胞因子的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine as a Potential Mediator in the Association between Periodontitis and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. Effect of a Novel Ergonomic Sheath on Dental Device-Related Muscle Work, Fatigue and Comfort-A Pilot Clinical Study. Evaluating Treatment Modalities for Reducing Recurrence in Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A Narrative Review. Influence of Direct Coronal Restoration Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars: An In Vitro Study. Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1