Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Common Bile Duct Dilation: A Real Breakthrough.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08628-x
A I Ferreira, S Xavier, F Dias de Castro, J Magalhães, S Leite, J Cotter
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Common Bile Duct Dilation: A Real Breakthrough.","authors":"A I Ferreira, S Xavier, F Dias de Castro, J Magalhães, S Leite, J Cotter","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08628-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is important for the evaluation of patients with common bile duct (CBD) dilation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EUS for CBD dilation in patients with negative initial studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients who underwent EUS for CBD dilation (≥ 7 mm if intact anatomy or ≥ 10 mm if prior cholecystectomy) in the absence of pathology on previous ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 patients were included, among whom 41 had a positive EUS: 33 choledocholithiasis (30.3%), 6 chronic pancreatitis (5.5%), and 2 ampullary cancer (1.8%). If the EUS was negative, no pathology was found during 1-year follow-up. Older age was associated with positive EUS (79 versus 71 years, p = 0.030). Patients with jaundice, cholelithiasis, and altered liver biochemistry were 16.2 (p = 0.002), 3.1 (p = 0.024), and 2.9 (p = 0.009) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. A total of 53 patients had a negative MRCP (48.6%); those with biliary abdominal pain and jaundice were 15.5 (p < 0.001) and 20.0 (p = 0.007) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. Considering asymptomatic patients with normal liver tests, CBD diameter ≥ 10 mm in US and ≥ 11 mm in CT can predict a positive EUS (AUC 0.754, p = 0.047 and AUC 0.734, p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS is a useful diagnostic method for patients with unexplained CBD dilation, even if negative MRCP, and especially in patients with older age, abdominal pain, jaundice, cholelithiasis, and/or altered liver biochemistry. CBD diameter in US and CT had a moderate discriminative ability in predicting positive EUS in asymptomatic patients without altered liver biochemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"4275-4282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08628-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is important for the evaluation of patients with common bile duct (CBD) dilation.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EUS for CBD dilation in patients with negative initial studies.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients who underwent EUS for CBD dilation (≥ 7 mm if intact anatomy or ≥ 10 mm if prior cholecystectomy) in the absence of pathology on previous ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

Results: A total of 109 patients were included, among whom 41 had a positive EUS: 33 choledocholithiasis (30.3%), 6 chronic pancreatitis (5.5%), and 2 ampullary cancer (1.8%). If the EUS was negative, no pathology was found during 1-year follow-up. Older age was associated with positive EUS (79 versus 71 years, p = 0.030). Patients with jaundice, cholelithiasis, and altered liver biochemistry were 16.2 (p = 0.002), 3.1 (p = 0.024), and 2.9 (p = 0.009) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. A total of 53 patients had a negative MRCP (48.6%); those with biliary abdominal pain and jaundice were 15.5 (p < 0.001) and 20.0 (p = 0.007) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. Considering asymptomatic patients with normal liver tests, CBD diameter ≥ 10 mm in US and ≥ 11 mm in CT can predict a positive EUS (AUC 0.754, p = 0.047 and AUC 0.734, p = 0.048).

Conclusions: EUS is a useful diagnostic method for patients with unexplained CBD dilation, even if negative MRCP, and especially in patients with older age, abdominal pain, jaundice, cholelithiasis, and/or altered liver biochemistry. CBD diameter in US and CT had a moderate discriminative ability in predicting positive EUS in asymptomatic patients without altered liver biochemistry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜超声在胆总管扩张中的诊断率:真正的突破
背景:内镜超声(EUS)对胆总管(CBD)扩张患者的评估非常重要。目的:本研究旨在评估EUS对初步检查阴性的CBD扩张患者的诊断效果:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了因CBD扩张(如果解剖结构完好,则≥7毫米;如果之前进行过胆囊切除术,则≥10毫米)而接受EUS检查的患者,这些患者在之前的超声波检查(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或磁共振胆胰管造影(MRCP)中均未发现病变:共纳入 109 例患者,其中 41 例 EUS 阳性:33 例胆总管结石(30.3%)、6 例慢性胰腺炎(5.5%)和 2 例胰腺癌(1.8%)。如果 EUS 为阴性,则在 1 年的随访中未发现病变。年龄较大与 EUS 阳性有关(79 岁对 71 岁,P = 0.030)。黄疸、胆石症和肝脏生化改变患者的 EUS 阳性率分别是黄疸、胆石症和肝脏生化改变患者的 16.2 倍(p = 0.002)、3.1 倍(p = 0.024)和 2.9 倍(p = 0.009)。共有 53 名患者的 MRCP 为阴性(48.6%);伴有胆汁性腹痛和黄疸的患者为 15.5 例(P 结论:EUS 是诊断胆汁性腹痛和黄疸的有效方法:对于原因不明的 CBD 扩张患者,即使 MRCP 阴性,尤其是年龄较大、腹痛、黄疸、胆石症和/或肝脏生化指标改变的患者,EUS 是一种有用的诊断方法。US 和 CT 中的 CBD 直径在预测无症状、无肝脏生化改变的患者的 EUS 阳性方面具有中等鉴别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Study of Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Initiating Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy. Extending Knowledge: The Case for Treat-to-Target Management in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Who Fail Early Treatment. Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Chronic Gastrointestinal Symptoms Have Alterations in Intestinal Neurotransmitter Pathways. Isolated Right Mesocolic Nodal Metastasis After Low Anterior Resection for Rectosigmoid Cancer. Rectal Diclofenac Versus Indomethacin in Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1