Utility of computed tomography brain scans in intubated patients with overdose

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14510
Michael Lousick BBiomedSc (Hons), MD, Serena Edwards BMedSc, MD, Gerben Keijzers MSc, MBBS, FACEM, PhD, Richard A F Pellatt MBChB, BA (Hons), FACEM
{"title":"Utility of computed tomography brain scans in intubated patients with overdose","authors":"Michael Lousick BBiomedSc (Hons), MD,&nbsp;Serena Edwards BMedSc, MD,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers MSc, MBBS, FACEM, PhD,&nbsp;Richard A F Pellatt MBChB, BA (Hons), FACEM","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Describe the yield of computed tomography brain (CTB) scans in patients intubated for drug overdose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective descriptive study using existing registry data from two Australian EDs between February 2021 and June 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and six patients were intubated; 159 (77%) received a post-intubation CTB scan. Of these, 38 out of 159 (24%) had a documented indication (i.e. head injury and seizure) for their scans, with a yield of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5–17%). Of the 121 out of 159 (76%) patients without an indication, the yield of CTB was 0% (95% CI = 0–3%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Routine imaging of patients intubated for overdose without clinical indication is unjustified.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Describe the yield of computed tomography brain (CTB) scans in patients intubated for drug overdose.

Methods

Retrospective descriptive study using existing registry data from two Australian EDs between February 2021 and June 2022.

Results

Two hundred and six patients were intubated; 159 (77%) received a post-intubation CTB scan. Of these, 38 out of 159 (24%) had a documented indication (i.e. head injury and seizure) for their scans, with a yield of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5–17%). Of the 121 out of 159 (76%) patients without an indication, the yield of CTB was 0% (95% CI = 0–3%).

Conclusions

Routine imaging of patients intubated for overdose without clinical indication is unjustified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层扫描脑部扫描在插管用药过量患者中的实用性。
目的描述因用药过量而插管的患者的脑部计算机断层扫描(CTB)结果:利用澳大利亚两家急诊室在 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 6 月期间的现有登记数据进行回顾性描述研究:26 名患者接受了插管;159 人(77%)接受了插管后 CTB 扫描。其中,159 人中有 38 人(24%)有扫描的记录指征(即头部损伤和癫痫发作),扫描率为 5.3%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.5-17%)。159名患者中有121名(76%)没有适应症,CTB的收益率为0%(95% CI = 0-3%):结论:在无临床指征的情况下对因用药过量而插管的患者进行常规成像是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Long Term Trends in Emergency Department Presentation Characteristics and Performance 2015-2022: A State-Wide Data Linkage Analysis From New South Wales Australia. A Review of 3 Years of Cardiac Arrest Phone Calls to a State-Based Poisons Centre. Non-Specific Low Back Pain in South Australian Public Hospital Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Observational Study Identifying Predictor Variables for a Future Clinical Decision Rule for Ordering of Chest X-Rays (CXR) for Non-Traumatic Chest Pain in Adult Emergency Department (ED) Patients Clinical Teacher in the Emergency Department: How Does It Benefit Emergency Medicine Trainees?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1