Association of first antiseizure medication with acute health care utilization in a cohort of adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1111/epi.18133
Leah J Blank, Parul Agarwal, Churl-Su Kwon, Kenneth Boockvar, Nathalie Jetté
{"title":"Association of first antiseizure medication with acute health care utilization in a cohort of adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy.","authors":"Leah J Blank, Parul Agarwal, Churl-Su Kwon, Kenneth Boockvar, Nathalie Jetté","doi":"10.1111/epi.18133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Epilepsy is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). The recommendations for first ASM in newly diagnosed epilepsy are inconsistently followed, and we sought to examine whether nonrecommended first ASM was associated with acute care utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years old) with newly diagnosed epilepsy (identified using validated epilepsy/convulsion International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification codes) in 2015-2019, sampled from Marketscan's Commercial and Medicare Databases. Exposure of interest was receipt of a non-guideline-recommended ASM, and the primary outcome was acute care utilization (an emergency department visit or hospitalization after the first ASM claim). Descriptive statistics characterized covariates, and multivariable negative binominal regression models were built adjusting for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbid neurologic disease (e.g., stroke), and ASM polypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 14 681 people with new epilepsy were prescribed an ASM within 1 year. The three most prescribed medications were levetiracetam (54%, n = 7912), gabapentin (10%, n = 1462), and topiramate (7%, n = 1022). Approximately 4% (n = 648) were prescribed an ASM that should be avoided, and ~74% of people with new epilepsy had an acute care visit during the follow-up period. Mean number of acute care visits during follow-up was 3.34 for \"recommended\" ASMs and 4.42 for ASMs that \"should be avoided.\" Prescription of a recommended/neutral ASM as compared to an ASM that should be avoided was associated with reduced likelihood of acute care utilization (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .77-.94). The recommended/neutral category of ASMs was not statistically significantly associated with seizure- or epilepsy-specific acute care utilization (IRR = .93, 95% CI = .79-1.09).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Adults with new epilepsy are frequent users of acute care. There remain a proportion of persons with epilepsy prescribed ASMs that guidelines suggest avoiding, and these ASMs are associated with increased likelihood of emergency department visit or hospitalization. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing the choice of first ASM in epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Epilepsy is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). The recommendations for first ASM in newly diagnosed epilepsy are inconsistently followed, and we sought to examine whether nonrecommended first ASM was associated with acute care utilization.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years old) with newly diagnosed epilepsy (identified using validated epilepsy/convulsion International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification codes) in 2015-2019, sampled from Marketscan's Commercial and Medicare Databases. Exposure of interest was receipt of a non-guideline-recommended ASM, and the primary outcome was acute care utilization (an emergency department visit or hospitalization after the first ASM claim). Descriptive statistics characterized covariates, and multivariable negative binominal regression models were built adjusting for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, comorbid neurologic disease (e.g., stroke), and ASM polypharmacy.

Results: Approximately 14 681 people with new epilepsy were prescribed an ASM within 1 year. The three most prescribed medications were levetiracetam (54%, n = 7912), gabapentin (10%, n = 1462), and topiramate (7%, n = 1022). Approximately 4% (n = 648) were prescribed an ASM that should be avoided, and ~74% of people with new epilepsy had an acute care visit during the follow-up period. Mean number of acute care visits during follow-up was 3.34 for "recommended" ASMs and 4.42 for ASMs that "should be avoided." Prescription of a recommended/neutral ASM as compared to an ASM that should be avoided was associated with reduced likelihood of acute care utilization (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .77-.94). The recommended/neutral category of ASMs was not statistically significantly associated with seizure- or epilepsy-specific acute care utilization (IRR = .93, 95% CI = .79-1.09).

Significance: Adults with new epilepsy are frequent users of acute care. There remain a proportion of persons with epilepsy prescribed ASMs that guidelines suggest avoiding, and these ASMs are associated with increased likelihood of emergency department visit or hospitalization. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing the choice of first ASM in epilepsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一组新确诊癫痫的成年人中,首次服用抗癫痫药物与急性期医疗使用率的关系。
目的:癫痫主要通过抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗。新诊断的癫痫患者首次使用抗癫痫药物的建议并不一致,我们试图研究未被推荐的首次使用抗癫痫药物是否与急性护理的使用有关:我们对 2015-2019 年新诊断为癫痫的成人(≥18 岁)进行了一项回顾性队列研究(使用有效的癫痫/惊厥国际疾病分类、临床修改代码进行识别),研究样本来自 Marketscan 的商业和医疗保险数据库。关注暴露是指接受非指南推荐的 ASM,主要结果是急性护理利用率(首次 ASM 索赔后的急诊就诊或住院)。描述性统计描述了协变量的特征,并建立了多变量负二项式回归模型,对年龄、性别、Elixhauser 生病指数、合并神经系统疾病(如中风)和 ASM 多药进行了调整:约有 14 681 名新发癫痫患者在 1 年内接受了 ASM 治疗。处方最多的三种药物是左乙拉西坦(54%,n = 7912)、加巴喷丁(10%,n = 1462)和托吡酯(7%,n = 1022)。约 4% 的患者(n = 648)被开具了应避免使用的 ASM 处方,约 74% 的新发癫痫患者在随访期间接受了急诊就诊。在随访期间,"推荐 "的 ASM 平均就诊次数为 3.34 次,"应避免 "的 ASM 平均就诊次数为 4.42 次。与应避免的 ASM 相比,处方推荐/中性 ASM 与使用急症护理的可能性降低相关(发生率比 [IRR] = .85,95% 置信区间 [CI] = .77- .94)。在统计学上,推荐/中性类别的 ASM 与癫痫发作或癫痫特异性急症护理使用率无显著相关性(IRR = .93,95% CI = .79-1.09):重要意义:成人癫痫患者是急症护理的频繁使用者。仍有一部分癫痫患者被处方了指南建议避免使用的 ASMs,而这些 ASMs 与急诊科就诊或住院的可能性增加有关。这些发现强化了优化癫痫患者首次ASM选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation to treat drug-resistant epilepsy: A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial. Histopathological substrate of increased T2 signal in the anterior temporal lobe white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction in drug-resistant epilepsy: A multi-center feasibility study. Long-term neuroplasticity in language networks after anterior temporal lobe resection. Eating habits and behaviors in children with Dravet syndrome: A case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1