Can similarity of autistic traits promote neural synchronization?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06919-3
Shuyuan Feng, Lin Ding, Mingliang Wang, Jianing Zhang, Yuqing Yuan, Peng Zhang, Xuejun Bai
{"title":"Can similarity of autistic traits promote neural synchronization?","authors":"Shuyuan Feng, Lin Ding, Mingliang Wang, Jianing Zhang, Yuqing Yuan, Peng Zhang, Xuejun Bai","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06919-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with similar levels of autistic traits are reported to exhibit better interactions than those with larger differences in autistic traits. However, whether this \"similarity effect\" exists at the neural level remains unclear. To address this gap, the present study employed functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning technology to assess inter-brain synchronization (IBS) during naturalistic conversations among dyads with three types of autistic trait combinations (20 high-high, 22 high-low, and 18 low-low dyads). The results revealed that the high-high dyads exhibited significantly lower IBS in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) region compared to the low-low dyads, with no significant differences observed between the high-low group and the other two groups. Moreover, though dyadic differences in conversation satisfaction were positively correlated with dyadic autistic trait differences, IBS only showed a significant negative correlation with the dyadic average autistic trait scores and no significant correlation with the dyadic difference scores of autistic traits. These findings suggest that dyads with high autistic traits may have shared feelings about conversations, but cannot produce IBS through successful mutual prediction and understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2633-2644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06919-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with similar levels of autistic traits are reported to exhibit better interactions than those with larger differences in autistic traits. However, whether this "similarity effect" exists at the neural level remains unclear. To address this gap, the present study employed functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning technology to assess inter-brain synchronization (IBS) during naturalistic conversations among dyads with three types of autistic trait combinations (20 high-high, 22 high-low, and 18 low-low dyads). The results revealed that the high-high dyads exhibited significantly lower IBS in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) region compared to the low-low dyads, with no significant differences observed between the high-low group and the other two groups. Moreover, though dyadic differences in conversation satisfaction were positively correlated with dyadic autistic trait differences, IBS only showed a significant negative correlation with the dyadic average autistic trait scores and no significant correlation with the dyadic difference scores of autistic traits. These findings suggest that dyads with high autistic traits may have shared feelings about conversations, but cannot produce IBS through successful mutual prediction and understanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症特征的相似性能促进神经同步吗?
据报道,自闭症特征相似的人比自闭症特征差异较大的人表现出更好的互动。然而,这种 "相似性效应 "是否存在于神经层面仍不清楚。为了填补这一空白,本研究采用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)超扫描技术,评估了三种自闭症特质组合(20 个高自闭症特质组合、22 个高自闭症特质组合和 18 个低自闭症特质组合)的对话者在自然对话过程中的脑间同步(IBS)。结果显示,与低自闭症特质组合相比,高自闭症特质组合在右侧颞顶叶交界处(rTPJ)区域表现出明显较低的 IBS,而高自闭症特质组合与其他两组之间没有观察到显著差异。此外,虽然对话满意度的双向差异与自闭症特质的双向差异呈正相关,但 IBS 只与自闭症特质的双向平均得分呈显著负相关,而与自闭症特质的双向差异得分无显著相关。这些研究结果表明,自闭症特质较高的两人可能对谈话有共同的感受,但无法通过成功的相互预测和理解产生 IBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Blending motor learning approaches for short-term adjustments to gait in people with Parkinson disease. Investigations of motor performance with neuromodulation and exoskeleton using leader-follower modality: a tDCS study. Blood flow modulation to improve motor and neurophysiological outcomes in individuals with stroke: a scoping review. Disruptive compensatory mechanisms in fibromyalgia syndrome and their association with pharmacological agents. Transiently worse postural effects after vestibulo-ocular reflex gain-down adaptation in healthy adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1