Eyes and hand are both reliable at localizing somatosensory targets.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06922-8
Marion Naffrechoux, Eric Koun, Frederic Volland, Alessandro Farnè, Alice Catherine Roy, Denis Pélisson
{"title":"Eyes and hand are both reliable at localizing somatosensory targets.","authors":"Marion Naffrechoux, Eric Koun, Frederic Volland, Alessandro Farnè, Alice Catherine Roy, Denis Pélisson","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06922-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body representations (BR) for action are critical to perform accurate movements. Yet, behavioral measures suggest that BR are distorted even in healthy people. However, the upper limb has mostly been used as a probe so far, making difficult to decide whether BR are truly distorted or whether this depends on the effector used as a readout. Here, we aimed to assess in healthy humans the accuracy of the eye and hand effectors in localizing somatosensory targets, to determine whether they may probe BR similarly. Twenty-six participants completed two localization tasks in which they had to localize an unseen target (proprioceptive or tactile) with either their eyes or hand. Linear mixed model revealed in both tasks a larger horizontal (but not vertical) localization error for the ocular than for the manual localization performance. However, despite better hand mean accuracy, manual and ocular localization performance positively correlated to each other in both tasks. Moreover, target position also affected localization performance for both eye and hand responses: accuracy was higher for the more flexed position of the elbow in the proprioceptive task and for the thumb than for the index finger in the tactile task, thus confirming previous results of better performance for the thumb. These findings indicate that the hand seems to beat the eyes along the horizontal axis when localizing somatosensory targets, but the localization patterns revealed by the two effectors seemed to be related and characterized by the same target effect, opening the way to assess BR with the eyes when upper limb motor control is disturbed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2653-2664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06922-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Body representations (BR) for action are critical to perform accurate movements. Yet, behavioral measures suggest that BR are distorted even in healthy people. However, the upper limb has mostly been used as a probe so far, making difficult to decide whether BR are truly distorted or whether this depends on the effector used as a readout. Here, we aimed to assess in healthy humans the accuracy of the eye and hand effectors in localizing somatosensory targets, to determine whether they may probe BR similarly. Twenty-six participants completed two localization tasks in which they had to localize an unseen target (proprioceptive or tactile) with either their eyes or hand. Linear mixed model revealed in both tasks a larger horizontal (but not vertical) localization error for the ocular than for the manual localization performance. However, despite better hand mean accuracy, manual and ocular localization performance positively correlated to each other in both tasks. Moreover, target position also affected localization performance for both eye and hand responses: accuracy was higher for the more flexed position of the elbow in the proprioceptive task and for the thumb than for the index finger in the tactile task, thus confirming previous results of better performance for the thumb. These findings indicate that the hand seems to beat the eyes along the horizontal axis when localizing somatosensory targets, but the localization patterns revealed by the two effectors seemed to be related and characterized by the same target effect, opening the way to assess BR with the eyes when upper limb motor control is disturbed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼睛和手都能可靠地定位体感目标。
动作的身体表征(BR)对于完成准确的动作至关重要。然而,行为测量结果表明,即使是健康人的身体表征也会发生扭曲。然而,迄今为止,人们大多使用上肢作为探针,因此很难确定身体表征是否真的失真,或者这是否取决于作为读数的效应器。在此,我们旨在评估健康人的眼部和手部效应器在定位躯体感觉目标时的准确性,以确定它们是否会对 BR 进行类似的探测。26 名参与者完成了两项定位任务,他们必须用眼睛或手定位一个未见目标(本体感觉或触觉)。线性混合模型显示,在这两项任务中,眼部定位的水平误差(而非垂直误差)大于手部定位的水平误差。然而,尽管手部定位的平均准确度更高,但在这两项任务中,手部定位和眼部定位的表现呈正相关。此外,目标位置也会影响眼部和手部反应的定位表现:在本体感觉任务中,肘部更弯曲位置的定位准确率更高;在触觉任务中,拇指的定位准确率高于食指,从而证实了之前的结果,即拇指的定位准确率更高。这些研究结果表明,在定位体感目标时,手在水平轴上的表现似乎优于眼睛,但两种效应器所显示的定位模式似乎是相关的,并具有相同的目标效应特征,这为在上肢运动控制受到干扰时用眼睛评估BR开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Blending motor learning approaches for short-term adjustments to gait in people with Parkinson disease. Investigations of motor performance with neuromodulation and exoskeleton using leader-follower modality: a tDCS study. Blood flow modulation to improve motor and neurophysiological outcomes in individuals with stroke: a scoping review. Disruptive compensatory mechanisms in fibromyalgia syndrome and their association with pharmacological agents. Transiently worse postural effects after vestibulo-ocular reflex gain-down adaptation in healthy adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1