The Influence of Wait Time on Surgical Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Degenerative Spine Conditions: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1177/21925682241287463
Michael Bond, Raphaële Charest-Morin, John Street, Charles Fisher, Nicolas Dea, Supriya Singh, Jerome Paquet, Edward Abraham, Christopher Bailey, Michael Weber, Andrew Nataraj, Najmedden Attabib, Adrienne Kelly, Raja Rampersaud, Neil Manson, Phillippe Phan, Ken Thomas, Alex Soroceanu, Bernard LaRue, Henry Ahn, Travis Marion, Sean Christie, Andrew Glennie, Wang Zhi, Hamilton Hall, Jason M Sutherland
{"title":"The Influence of Wait Time on Surgical Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Degenerative Spine Conditions: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.","authors":"Michael Bond, Raphaële Charest-Morin, John Street, Charles Fisher, Nicolas Dea, Supriya Singh, Jerome Paquet, Edward Abraham, Christopher Bailey, Michael Weber, Andrew Nataraj, Najmedden Attabib, Adrienne Kelly, Raja Rampersaud, Neil Manson, Phillippe Phan, Ken Thomas, Alex Soroceanu, Bernard LaRue, Henry Ahn, Travis Marion, Sean Christie, Andrew Glennie, Wang Zhi, Hamilton Hall, Jason M Sutherland","doi":"10.1177/21925682241287463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The impact of delayed access to operative treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) for lumbar degenerative conditions remains unclear. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between wait times for elective lumbar spine surgery and post-operative PROs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for a degenerative lumbar conditions. Wait times were calculated from primary care referral to surgery, termed the cumulative wait time (CWT). CWT benchmarks were created at 3, 6 and 12 months. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to measure the associations between CWT and meeting the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2281 patients were included in the study cohort. The average age was 59.4 years (SD 14.8). The median CWT was 43.1 weeks (IQR 17.8 - 60.6) and only 30.9% had treatment within 6 months. Patients were more likely achieve the MCID for the ODI at 12 months post-operatively if they had surgery within 6 months of referral from primary care (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.11 - 1.34). This relationship was also found at a benchmark CWT time of 3 months (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.54) though not at 12 months (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97 - 1.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received operative treatment within a 3- and 6-month benchmark between referral and surgery were more likely to experience noticeable improvement in post-operative function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241287463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: The impact of delayed access to operative treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) for lumbar degenerative conditions remains unclear. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between wait times for elective lumbar spine surgery and post-operative PROs.

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for a degenerative lumbar conditions. Wait times were calculated from primary care referral to surgery, termed the cumulative wait time (CWT). CWT benchmarks were created at 3, 6 and 12 months. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to measure the associations between CWT and meeting the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-operatively.

Results: A total of 2281 patients were included in the study cohort. The average age was 59.4 years (SD 14.8). The median CWT was 43.1 weeks (IQR 17.8 - 60.6) and only 30.9% had treatment within 6 months. Patients were more likely achieve the MCID for the ODI at 12 months post-operatively if they had surgery within 6 months of referral from primary care (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.11 - 1.34). This relationship was also found at a benchmark CWT time of 3 months (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.54) though not at 12 months (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97 - 1.20).

Conclusions: Patients who received operative treatment within a 3- and 6-month benchmark between referral and surgery were more likely to experience noticeable improvement in post-operative function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等待时间对择期腰椎退行性病变手术结果的影响:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
研究设计研究目的:回顾性队列研究:延迟手术治疗对腰椎退行性病变患者报告结果(PROs)的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估择期腰椎手术的等待时间与术后PROs之间的关系:本研究对接受腰椎退行性疾病手术治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。研究计算了从初级保健转诊到手术的等待时间,称为累积等待时间(CWT)。CWT基准分别为3、6和12个月。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来测量 CWT 与术后 12 个月 Oswestry 失能指数 (ODI) 评分达到最小临床意义差异 (MCID) 之间的关系:共有 2281 名患者被纳入研究队列。平均年龄为 59.4 岁(标清 14.8)。中位 CWT 为 43.1 周(IQR 为 17.8 - 60.6),只有 30.9% 的患者在 6 个月内接受了治疗。如果患者在基层医疗机构转诊后 6 个月内接受手术治疗,则其术后 12 个月的 ODI 更有可能达到 MCID(OR 1.22;95% CI 1.11 - 1.34)。在 3 个月的 CWT 基准时间内也发现了这种关系(OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.54),但在 12 个月时没有发现这种关系(OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97 - 1.20):在转诊和手术之间的 3 个月和 6 个月基准时间内接受手术治疗的患者,术后功能更有可能得到明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1