Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9
Kelsey R Tieken, Ka-Chun Siu, Jihyun Ma, Anthony Murante, Tiffany N Tanner, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins
{"title":"Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh.","authors":"Kelsey R Tieken, Ka-Chun Siu, Jihyun Ma, Anthony Murante, Tiffany N Tanner, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General differences in surgeon ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (LIHR vs. RIHR) have been previously studied. However, specific differences in the ergonomics of mesh placement (MP) and mesh fixation (MF) are undetermined. Our aim was to determine if there are differences in the ergonomics of MP and MF between the surgical approaches. We hypothesize that we will identify differences, with the potential for worse ergonomics during LIHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from fifteen LIHR and fifteen RIHR. All cases were elective, primary inguinal hernias completed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeon. Surface electromyography (EMG) of four upper extremity muscle groups, including the upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor digitorum (ED), was recorded bilaterally during MP and MF. Muscle activation as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC<sub>RMS</sub>) and muscle fatigue denoted as the median frequency of muscle activations (Fmed) were calculated for each muscle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMG analysis showed increased %MVC<sub>RMS</sub> in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant findings in the left UT, right UT, ED, and FCR for MP and MF and the left FCR during MP. Muscle fatigue was decreased in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant differences in left FCR and right ED and AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite greater muscle activations during LIHR, RIHR had greater muscle fatigue. It is possible that short periods of high muscle activation are ergonomically protective during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Identifying these differences may aid in development of procedure-specific interventions to improve ergonomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03168-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: General differences in surgeon ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (LIHR vs. RIHR) have been previously studied. However, specific differences in the ergonomics of mesh placement (MP) and mesh fixation (MF) are undetermined. Our aim was to determine if there are differences in the ergonomics of MP and MF between the surgical approaches. We hypothesize that we will identify differences, with the potential for worse ergonomics during LIHR.

Methods: Data was collected from fifteen LIHR and fifteen RIHR. All cases were elective, primary inguinal hernias completed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeon. Surface electromyography (EMG) of four upper extremity muscle groups, including the upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor digitorum (ED), was recorded bilaterally during MP and MF. Muscle activation as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVCRMS) and muscle fatigue denoted as the median frequency of muscle activations (Fmed) were calculated for each muscle.

Results: EMG analysis showed increased %MVCRMS in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant findings in the left UT, right UT, ED, and FCR for MP and MF and the left FCR during MP. Muscle fatigue was decreased in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant differences in left FCR and right ED and AD.

Conclusion: Despite greater muscle activations during LIHR, RIHR had greater muscle fatigue. It is possible that short periods of high muscle activation are ergonomically protective during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Identifying these differences may aid in development of procedure-specific interventions to improve ergonomics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和机器人腹股沟疝修补术在网片放置和网片固定方面的人体工程学差异。
目的:以前曾研究过腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR 与 RIHR)在外科医生工效学方面的一般差异。然而,网片放置(MP)和网片固定(MF)工效学方面的具体差异尚未确定。我们的目的是确定两种手术方法在网片置入和网片固定的人体工程学方面是否存在差异。我们假设,我们将发现差异,并可能在 LIHR 过程中发现更差的工效:从 15 例 LIHR 和 15 例 RIHR 收集数据。所有病例均为选择性原发性腹股沟疝,由受过研究培训的微创外科医生完成。在 MP 和 MF 过程中记录了双侧四组上肢肌肉的表面肌电图(EMG),包括斜方肌上部(UT)、三角肌前部(AD)、腕屈肌(FCR)和趾伸肌(ED)。以最大自主收缩百分比(%MVCRMS)表示肌肉激活,以肌肉激活频率中位数(Fmed)表示肌肉疲劳,并计算每块肌肉的激活率:EMG分析显示,与RIHR病例相比,LIHR病例的肌肉最大自主收缩百分比(%MVCRMS)增加,左侧UT、右侧UT、ED和FCR在MP和MF时以及左侧FCR在MP时有显著发现。与 RIHR 病例相比,LIHR 病例的肌肉疲劳程度降低,左侧 FCR 和右侧 ED 和 AD 有显著差异:结论:尽管在 LIHR 期间肌肉激活程度更高,但 RIHR 的肌肉疲劳程度更高。在微创腹股沟疝修补术中,短时间的肌肉高度激活可能对人体工学具有保护作用。确定这些差异可能有助于开发针对特定手术的干预措施,以改善人体工程学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
期刊最新文献
Complications related to the prehabilitation with preoperative pneumoperitoneum in loss of domain hernias: our experience in 180 consecutive cases. Navigating uncharted territory: robotic repair of a rare primary perineal hernia. Comment to: The effect of surgical repair of hiatal hernia (HH) on pulmonary function. Comment to: The modified frailty index predicts postoperative morbidity in elective hernia repair patients. The impact of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics on postoperative pain level, quality of life, and outcomes in ventral hernia repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1