Identifying Who Benefits the Most from a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention for Hypertension.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6311938
Meng Pan, Andrea Beratarrechea, Rosana Poggio, Hua He, Chung-Shiuan Chen, Jing Chen, Vilma Irazola, Adolfo Rubinstein, Jiang He, Katherine T Mills
{"title":"Identifying Who Benefits the Most from a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention for Hypertension.","authors":"Meng Pan, Andrea Beratarrechea, Rosana Poggio, Hua He, Chung-Shiuan Chen, Jing Chen, Vilma Irazola, Adolfo Rubinstein, Jiang He, Katherine T Mills","doi":"10.1155/2024/6311938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncontrolled hypertension is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. The Hypertension Control Program in Argentina (HCPIA) showed that a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention was effective for blood pressure (BP) reduction in resource-limited settings, but whether the intervention was equally effective across participant subgroups is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify participants who benefit the most from the HCPIA BP control intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from HCPIA, a successful 18-month cluster-randomized trial in 18 health centers with 1,432 low-income hypertensive patients in Argentina. Fifteen baseline characteristics were used to define subgroups. The proportion of controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg) was estimated using generalized linear mixed models with arm-by-subgroup interaction terms. The distribution of trial BP response among intervention patient subgroups was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 53.0% female, a mean age of 56 years, and 17.4% controlled BP at baseline. After the intervention, 72.9% of intervention and 52.2% of control participants had controlled BP. The intervention was more effective in physically inactive patients (OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.82 and 4.21; <i>p</i> for interaction = 0.04), moderately active patients (OR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.90 and 4.99; <i>p</i> for interaction = 0.03), and those with uncontrolled BP at baseline (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.15 and 3.57; <i>p</i> for interaction = 0.05). Among intervention participants, 20.2% had no BP response (BP change < -4 mmHg), 41.3% had a moderate BP response (BP change: -4 mmHg to -24 mmHg), and 38.5% had a high BP response (BP change > -24 mmHg). Women (<i>p</i>=0.01), those who were physically inactive (<i>p</i>=0.03), and those not taking antihypertensive medications at baseline (<i>p</i>=0.001) had the greatest BP response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of the intervention was consistent across many subgroups with some key groups showing a particularly strong intervention effect. These findings could be useful for planning future hypertension control programs in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14132,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6311938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncontrolled hypertension is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. The Hypertension Control Program in Argentina (HCPIA) showed that a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention was effective for blood pressure (BP) reduction in resource-limited settings, but whether the intervention was equally effective across participant subgroups is unknown.

Objective: To identify participants who benefit the most from the HCPIA BP control intervention.

Methods: This secondary analysis used data from HCPIA, a successful 18-month cluster-randomized trial in 18 health centers with 1,432 low-income hypertensive patients in Argentina. Fifteen baseline characteristics were used to define subgroups. The proportion of controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg) was estimated using generalized linear mixed models with arm-by-subgroup interaction terms. The distribution of trial BP response among intervention patient subgroups was assessed.

Results: Participants were 53.0% female, a mean age of 56 years, and 17.4% controlled BP at baseline. After the intervention, 72.9% of intervention and 52.2% of control participants had controlled BP. The intervention was more effective in physically inactive patients (OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.82 and 4.21; p for interaction = 0.04), moderately active patients (OR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.90 and 4.99; p for interaction = 0.03), and those with uncontrolled BP at baseline (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.15 and 3.57; p for interaction = 0.05). Among intervention participants, 20.2% had no BP response (BP change < -4 mmHg), 41.3% had a moderate BP response (BP change: -4 mmHg to -24 mmHg), and 38.5% had a high BP response (BP change > -24 mmHg). Women (p=0.01), those who were physically inactive (p=0.03), and those not taking antihypertensive medications at baseline (p=0.001) had the greatest BP response.

Conclusion: The effect of the intervention was consistent across many subgroups with some key groups showing a particularly strong intervention effect. These findings could be useful for planning future hypertension control programs in low- and middle-income countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定谁能从社区卫生工作人员主导的多成分高血压干预措施中获益最多。
背景:无法控制的高血压是中低收入国家面临的一项重大公共卫生挑战。阿根廷高血压控制计划(HCPIA)表明,在资源有限的环境中,由社区卫生工作者主导的多成分干预措施能有效降低血压,但该干预措施在不同参与者亚群中是否同样有效尚不清楚:目的:确定从 HCPIA 血压控制干预中获益最多的参与者:这项二次分析使用了 HCPIA 的数据。HCPIA 是一项为期 18 个月的集群随机试验,在阿根廷的 18 个医疗中心成功开展,共有 1432 名低收入高血压患者参与。15 个基线特征用于定义亚组。血压得到控制的比例(结果:53.0%的参与者为女性):53.0%的参与者为女性,平均年龄为 56 岁,17.4%的参与者在基线时血压得到控制。干预后,72.9% 的干预参与者和 52.2% 的对照参与者血压得到控制。干预对身体不活跃的患者(OR = 2.76,95% CI:1.82 和 4.21;交互作用 p = 0.04)、中等活跃的患者(OR = 3.08,95% CI:1.90 和 4.99;交互作用 p = 0.03)和基线血压未控制的患者(OR = 2.77,95% CI:2.15 和 3.57;交互作用 p = 0.05)更有效。在干预参与者中,有 20.2% 的人没有血压反应(血压变化 -24 mmHg)。女性(p=0.01)、不运动者(p=0.03)和基线时未服用降压药者(p=0.001)的血压反应最大:结论:干预效果在许多亚群中都是一致的,一些关键群体的干预效果尤为显著。这些发现有助于中低收入国家规划未来的高血压控制计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hypertension
International Journal of Hypertension Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for clinicians and basic scientists interested in blood pressure regulation and pathophysiology, as well as treatment and prevention of hypertension. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on the etiology and risk factors of hypertension, with a special focus on vascular biology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, and hypertensive nephropathy.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Who Benefits the Most from a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention for Hypertension. Effects of Renal Denervation on Ouabain-Induced Hypertension in Rats. Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors Associated with Diagonal Earlobe Crease (Frank Sign) in Mexican Adults: Aging, Obesity, Arterial Hypertension, and Being Male Are the Most Important. Effect of Yogurt Intake Frequency on Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study An Assessment of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hypertensive Crisis in Patients Who Visited the Emergency Outpatient Department (EOPD) at Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Oromia, Ethiopia: A 6-Month Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1