An Exploratory Analysis of the Conditional Neurocognitive Function Failure Risk in Patients Receiving Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases on NRG Oncology CC001.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.029
Hua-Ren R Cherng, Kai Sun, Soren M Bentzen, Mark V Mishra
{"title":"An Exploratory Analysis of the Conditional Neurocognitive Function Failure Risk in Patients Receiving Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases on NRG Oncology CC001.","authors":"Hua-Ren R Cherng, Kai Sun, Soren M Bentzen, Mark V Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to estimate the conditional risk of development of neurocognitive function failure (NCFF) after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases on NRG Oncology CC001. In addition, we aimed to determine if factors prognostic of NCFF at time of treatment remained relevant over time.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We performed a post hoc analysis of 518 patients enrolled on NRG-CC001 in which patients with brain metastases were randomly assigned to WBRT + memantine or hippocampal avoidant (HA-WBRT) + memantine. Life table method was used to calculate conditional monthly hazard rates and cumulative incidence was used to estimate rates of NCFF. Risk factors associated with NCFF were analyzed using cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative risk of development of NCFF by 6 months was 64.0% for the entire cohort. The greatest conditional monthly hazard rate of development of neurocognitive toxicity was 2 to 3 months postradiation (0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10); this rate significantly declined and then plateaued to 0.036 (95% CI, 0-0.11) by 8 months posttreatment. For 2-month survivorship without cognitive failure, HA-WBRT (HR, 0.74; P = .033) and age ≤61 years (HR, 0.62; P = .003) continued to be protective against cognitive toxicity. In addition, conditional cumulative incidence of development of NCFF was significantly reduced with HA techniques for patients living ≥2 months free of cognitive dysfunction (P = .047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data highlight that the greatest risk of development of neurocognitive toxicity is within the first 3 months after treatment, and therefore strategies to mitigate toxicities should focus on this initial period. Moreover, the conditional risk of neurocognitive impairment significantly declines the longer patients live with preserved cognition. Importantly, these data can be used to inform patients on how their risks of development of NCFF can change over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":"475-480"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to estimate the conditional risk of development of neurocognitive function failure (NCFF) after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases on NRG Oncology CC001. In addition, we aimed to determine if factors prognostic of NCFF at time of treatment remained relevant over time.

Methods and materials: We performed a post hoc analysis of 518 patients enrolled on NRG-CC001 in which patients with brain metastases were randomly assigned to WBRT + memantine or hippocampal avoidant (HA-WBRT) + memantine. Life table method was used to calculate conditional monthly hazard rates and cumulative incidence was used to estimate rates of NCFF. Risk factors associated with NCFF were analyzed using cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: The cumulative risk of development of NCFF by 6 months was 64.0% for the entire cohort. The greatest conditional monthly hazard rate of development of neurocognitive toxicity was 2 to 3 months postradiation (0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.10); this rate significantly declined and then plateaued to 0.036 (95% CI, 0-0.11) by 8 months posttreatment. For 2-month survivorship without cognitive failure, HA-WBRT (HR, 0.74; P = .033) and age ≤61 years (HR, 0.62; P = .003) continued to be protective against cognitive toxicity. In addition, conditional cumulative incidence of development of NCFF was significantly reduced with HA techniques for patients living ≥2 months free of cognitive dysfunction (P = .047).

Conclusions: Our data highlight that the greatest risk of development of neurocognitive toxicity is within the first 3 months after treatment, and therefore strategies to mitigate toxicities should focus on this initial period. Moreover, the conditional risk of neurocognitive impairment significantly declines the longer patients live with preserved cognition. Importantly, these data can be used to inform patients on how their risks of development of NCFF can change over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 NRG Oncology CC001 上接受全脑放疗治疗脑转移瘤患者的条件性神经认知功能失效风险探索性分析:条件性神经认知毒性风险。
目的:我们试图估算接受NRG肿瘤CC001治疗的脑转移(BM)患者在接受全脑放疗(WBRT)后发生神经认知功能衰竭(NCFF)的条件风险。此外,我们还旨在确定在治疗时预示神经认知功能衰竭的因素是否随着时间的推移仍具有相关性:我们对参加 NRG CC001 的 518 名患者进行了事后分析,其中 BM 患者被随机分配到 WBRT + 美金刚或海马回避剂(HA-WBRT)+ 美金刚。采用生命表法计算条件月危险率,采用累积发病率估算NCFF的发病率。使用特定病因多变量考克斯比例危险模型分析了与NCFF相关的风险因素:结果:在整个队列中,6个月前发生NCFF的累积风险为64.0%。放射治疗后2-3个月时,神经认知毒性的条件月危险率最大(0.97,95% CI 0.85-1.10);治疗后8个月时,该危险率显著下降,然后稳定在0.036(95% CI:0-0.11)。对于无认知功能障碍的 2 个月存活率,HA-WBRT(HR 0.74,P=0.033)和年龄≤61(HR 0.62,P=0.003)对认知毒性仍有保护作用。此外,使用HA技术可显著降低存活≥2个月无认知功能障碍患者的NCFF条件累积发生率(P=0.047):我们的数据突出表明,神经认知毒性的最大风险发生在治疗后的头 3 个月,因此减轻毒性的策略应集中在这一初始阶段。此外,神经认知障碍的条件风险随着患者认知能力保留时间的延长而显著降低。重要的是,这些数据可用于告知患者,随着时间的推移,他们发生神经认知功能损伤的风险会发生怎样的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Defining the Biologically Active Tumor for Radiation Therapy. Erratum to: Gondi V, Deshmukh S, Brown PD, et al. Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;117:571-580. Erratum to: Santos M, Oliveira e Silva LF, Kohler HF, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer: Results From a Prospective, Real-World Data Study With Brazilian Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, Conformal and Conventional Radiation Techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;109:485-494. In Regard to Udovicich et al. Navigating Treacherous Waters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1