Pharmacological Interventions for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents with Tourette Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1089/cap.2024.0049
Luis C Farhat, Emily Behling, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Pedro Macul Ferreira de Barros, Guilherme V Polanczyk, Samuele Cortese, Michael H Bloch
{"title":"Pharmacological Interventions for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents with Tourette Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Luis C Farhat, Emily Behling, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Pedro Macul Ferreira de Barros, Guilherme V Polanczyk, Samuele Cortese, Michael H Bloch","doi":"10.1089/cap.2024.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with a dual diagnosis of persistent tic disorders or Tourette disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (TD + ADHD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP up to September 2023 to identify double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with TD + ADHD. Outcomes were change in ADHD symptoms (primary) and tics (secondary) severity. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and pooled in random-effects network meta-analysis. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was adopted to determine certainty of evidence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included 8 RCTs involving 575 participants. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that α2 agonists (SMD, 95% confidence interval [CI] ADHD: -0.72 [-1.13 to -0.31]; TD: -0.70 [-0.96 to -0.45]) and stimulants + α2 agonists (ADHD: -0.84 [-1.54 to -0.13]; TD: -0.60 [-1.04 to -0.17]) were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms and tics severity. Stimulants alone were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms severity only, but they did not worsen tics (ADHD: -0.54 [-1.05 to -0.03]; TD: -0.22 [-0.49 to 0.05]). There were no significant differences between any pairs of medications that were found efficacious against placebo for ADHD symptoms or tics severity. Certainty in the evidence varied from low to very low. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Stimulants are efficacious for ADHD symptoms severity and do not increase tics severity in TD + ADHD. α2 agonists are efficacious for both ADHD symptoms and tics severity in TD + ADHD. These findings should inform guidelines and help guide shared decision-making to choose a medication for children with TD + ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"373-382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2024.0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with a dual diagnosis of persistent tic disorders or Tourette disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (TD + ADHD). Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP up to September 2023 to identify double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with TD + ADHD. Outcomes were change in ADHD symptoms (primary) and tics (secondary) severity. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and pooled in random-effects network meta-analysis. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was adopted to determine certainty of evidence. Results: We included 8 RCTs involving 575 participants. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that α2 agonists (SMD, 95% confidence interval [CI] ADHD: -0.72 [-1.13 to -0.31]; TD: -0.70 [-0.96 to -0.45]) and stimulants + α2 agonists (ADHD: -0.84 [-1.54 to -0.13]; TD: -0.60 [-1.04 to -0.17]) were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms and tics severity. Stimulants alone were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms severity only, but they did not worsen tics (ADHD: -0.54 [-1.05 to -0.03]; TD: -0.22 [-0.49 to 0.05]). There were no significant differences between any pairs of medications that were found efficacious against placebo for ADHD symptoms or tics severity. Certainty in the evidence varied from low to very low. Conclusions: Stimulants are efficacious for ADHD symptoms severity and do not increase tics severity in TD + ADHD. α2 agonists are efficacious for both ADHD symptoms and tics severity in TD + ADHD. These findings should inform guidelines and help guide shared decision-making to choose a medication for children with TD + ADHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年妥瑞症患者注意缺陷/多动障碍的药物干预:系统回顾与网络元分析》。
目的评估药物干预对患有持续性抽动障碍或图雷特障碍和注意力缺陷/多动症(TD + ADHD)双重诊断的儿童和青少年的疗效比较。研究方法我们检索了 CENTRAL、Embase、PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Sciences、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 WHO ICTRP(截至 2023 年 9 月),以确定评估针对 TD + ADHD 儿童和青少年药物干预的双盲随机对照试验 (RCT)。研究结果为多动症症状(原发性)和抽搐(继发性)严重程度的变化。在随机效应网络荟萃分析中计算并汇总标准化平均差(SMD)。采用网络荟萃分析框架确定证据的确定性。结果我们纳入了 8 项研究性试验,涉及 575 名参与者。网络荟萃分析表明,α2激动剂(SMD,95%置信区间[CI] ADHD:-0.72 [-1.13 至 -0.31];TD:-0.70 [-0.96 至 -0.45])和兴奋剂+α2激动剂(ADHD:-0.84 [-1.54 至 -0.13];TD:-0.60 [-1.04 至 -0.17])对ADHD症状和抽搐严重程度的疗效优于安慰剂。仅就ADHD症状严重程度而言,单用兴奋剂比安慰剂更有效,但它们不会加重抽搐(ADHD:-0.54 [-1.05 至 -0.03];TD:-0.22 [-0.49 至 0.05])。在ADHD症状或抽搐严重程度方面,与安慰剂相比,任何一对药物的疗效均无明显差异。证据的确定性从低到极低不等。结论:α2激动剂对TD+ADHD患者的ADHD症状和抽搐严重程度均有效。这些发现应为指南提供参考,并有助于指导共同决策,为TD + ADHD儿童选择药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes: New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.
期刊最新文献
Pain in Tourette Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review. Letter: Mirtazapine-Associated Hyperkinetic Movements in a 17-Year-Old with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Chronic Catatonia: A Case Report. From the Editor-in-Chief's Desk: Gratitude for Mentors and Colleagues. Incident Psychotropic Medication Use Among US Commercially Insured Children and Adolescents from 2019 to 2022. SYNGAP-1 Mutation And Catatonia: A Case Series and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1