Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of comparative effectiveness research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0102
Hilde Ten Berge, Katerina Togka, Xuanqi Pan, Marina Borges, Fernando Palma Martelo, Fernando Guedes, Daniel Cabral, Encarnação Teixeira, Gabriela Fernandes, Lurdes Ferreira, Sara Figueiredo, Rita Sousa, Lourdes Barradas, Fernanda Estevinho, António Araújo, Venceslau Hespanhol, Rui Medeiros
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal.","authors":"Hilde Ten Berge, Katerina Togka, Xuanqi Pan, Marina Borges, Fernando Palma Martelo, Fernando Guedes, Daniel Cabral, Encarnação Teixeira, Gabriela Fernandes, Lurdes Ferreira, Sara Figueiredo, Rita Sousa, Lourdes Barradas, Fernanda Estevinho, António Araújo, Venceslau Hespanhol, Rui Medeiros","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Portugal. The Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening (LCS) study (NELSON), the biggest European LCS study, showed a lung cancer mortality reduction in a high-risk population when being screened. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of LCS, based on the NELSON study protocol and outcomes, was evaluated compared with no screening in Portugal. <b>Methods:</b> The present study modified an established decision tree by incorporating a state-transition Markov model to evaluate the health-related advantages and economic implications of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LCS from the healthcare standpoint in Portugal. The analysis compared screening versus no screening for a high-risk population aged 50-75 with a smoking history. Various metrics, including clinical outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life-years (LYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were calculated to measure the impact of LDCT LCS. Furthermore, scenario and sensitivity analyses were executed to assess the robustness of the obtained results. <b>Results:</b> Annual LCS with volume-based LDCT resulted in €558 million additional costs and 86,678 additional QALYs resulting in an ICER of €6440 per QALY for one screening group and a lifetime horizon. In total, 13,217 premature lung cancer deaths could be averted, leading to 1.41 additional QALYs gained per individual diagnosed with lung cancer. Results are robust based on the sensitivity analyses. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study showed that annual LDCT LCS for a high-risk population could be cost-effective in Portugal based on a willingness to pay a threshold of one-time the GDP (€19,290 per QALY gained).</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Portugal. The Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening (LCS) study (NELSON), the biggest European LCS study, showed a lung cancer mortality reduction in a high-risk population when being screened. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of LCS, based on the NELSON study protocol and outcomes, was evaluated compared with no screening in Portugal. Methods: The present study modified an established decision tree by incorporating a state-transition Markov model to evaluate the health-related advantages and economic implications of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) LCS from the healthcare standpoint in Portugal. The analysis compared screening versus no screening for a high-risk population aged 50-75 with a smoking history. Various metrics, including clinical outcomes, costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life-years (LYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), were calculated to measure the impact of LDCT LCS. Furthermore, scenario and sensitivity analyses were executed to assess the robustness of the obtained results. Results: Annual LCS with volume-based LDCT resulted in €558 million additional costs and 86,678 additional QALYs resulting in an ICER of €6440 per QALY for one screening group and a lifetime horizon. In total, 13,217 premature lung cancer deaths could be averted, leading to 1.41 additional QALYs gained per individual diagnosed with lung cancer. Results are robust based on the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: This study showed that annual LDCT LCS for a high-risk population could be cost-effective in Portugal based on a willingness to pay a threshold of one-time the GDP (€19,290 per QALY gained).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙利用容积计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的成本效益。
目的:肺癌是葡萄牙最常见的癌症死因。荷兰-比利时肺癌筛查(LCS)研究(NELSON)是欧洲最大的肺癌筛查研究,该研究显示,接受筛查的高危人群肺癌死亡率有所下降。在本研究中,根据 NELSON 研究的方案和结果,对葡萄牙肺癌筛查的成本效益进行了评估,并与不进行筛查进行了比较。方法:本研究对已有的决策树进行了修改,纳入了状态转换马尔可夫模型,从葡萄牙医疗保健的角度评估低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)LCS 的健康相关优势和经济影响。该分析对 50-75 岁有吸烟史的高危人群进行了筛查与不筛查的比较。通过计算各种指标,包括临床结果、成本、质量调整生命年 (QALY)、生命年 (LY) 和增量成本效益比 (ICER),来衡量 LDCT LCS 的影响。此外,还进行了情景分析和敏感性分析,以评估所得结果的稳健性。结果使用基于容积的 LDCT 进行年度 LCS 会增加 5.58 亿欧元的成本,增加 86,678 个 QALY,在一个筛查组和终生范围内,每 QALY 的 ICER 为 6440 欧元。总共可避免 13,217 例肺癌过早死亡,从而使每名确诊肺癌患者增加 1.41 个 QALY。根据敏感性分析,结果是可靠的。结论该研究表明,在葡萄牙,根据一次性 GDP(每获得 1 QALY 为 19,290 欧元)的支付意愿阈值,每年为高风险人群进行 LDCT LCS 治疗是具有成本效益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Dependent censoring bias assessment using inverse probability of censoring weights: Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk in patients initiating bisoprolol versus other antihypertensives in a Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort study. Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and HTA: part 5. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal. Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications. Ravulizumab for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis: a plain language summary of three studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1