'It's especially good just to know that you're not the only one': a qualitative study exploring experiences with online peer support programmes for the Fragile X community.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1111/jir.13188
T Haber, L Davies, R S Hinman, K L Bennell, W Bruce, L Jewell, A Borda, B J Lawford
{"title":"'It's especially good just to know that you're not the only one': a qualitative study exploring experiences with online peer support programmes for the Fragile X community.","authors":"T Haber, L Davies, R S Hinman, K L Bennell, W Bruce, L Jewell, A Borda, B J Lawford","doi":"10.1111/jir.13188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accessing peer support can be difficult for people with, or carers of people with, inherited intellectual disabilities. One way to improve access is to provide services online, yet few studies have explored people's experiences with online peer support programmes. We aimed to explore experiences with such programmes for communities affected by fragile X-associated conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study involving individual semi-structured interviews with 16 people with, or carers of people with, a fragile X-associated condition (n = 4 adult premutation carriers; n = 12 parents/carers of children/adults), who participated in at least one of three online peer support programmes: educational webinars, Facebook discussion group and small peer group sessions via Zoom. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes relating to experiences were as follows: (1) uncertainty and value of shared experiences, (2) support navigating healthcare, (3) advantages being online, but still a place for in-person events. Educational webinars were perceived to be a valuable source of information about fragile X-associated conditions although people had variable information needs. Facebook discussion groups enabled people to connect with others, although participants expressed some competing preferences for how the groups were organised. Zoom peer group sessions were perceived to help participants feel supported by others, but that consistency in organisation was important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online peer support programmes were perceived to be beneficial, bridging informational gaps and facilitating social connection. However, participants believed there was still a place for in-person events, some felt educational webinars did not always meet their needs and some had privacy concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accessing peer support can be difficult for people with, or carers of people with, inherited intellectual disabilities. One way to improve access is to provide services online, yet few studies have explored people's experiences with online peer support programmes. We aimed to explore experiences with such programmes for communities affected by fragile X-associated conditions.

Methods: Qualitative study involving individual semi-structured interviews with 16 people with, or carers of people with, a fragile X-associated condition (n = 4 adult premutation carriers; n = 12 parents/carers of children/adults), who participated in at least one of three online peer support programmes: educational webinars, Facebook discussion group and small peer group sessions via Zoom. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes.

Results: Three overarching themes relating to experiences were as follows: (1) uncertainty and value of shared experiences, (2) support navigating healthcare, (3) advantages being online, but still a place for in-person events. Educational webinars were perceived to be a valuable source of information about fragile X-associated conditions although people had variable information needs. Facebook discussion groups enabled people to connect with others, although participants expressed some competing preferences for how the groups were organised. Zoom peer group sessions were perceived to help participants feel supported by others, but that consistency in organisation was important.

Conclusions: Online peer support programmes were perceived to be beneficial, bridging informational gaps and facilitating social connection. However, participants believed there was still a place for in-person events, some felt educational webinars did not always meet their needs and some had privacy concerns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知道你不是唯一的一个,感觉特别好":一项定性研究,探索脆性 X 社区在线同伴支持计划的经验。
背景:对于遗传性智障人士或其照顾者来说,获得同伴支持可能很困难。改善获取途径的方法之一是在网上提供服务,但很少有研究探讨人们对网上同伴支持计划的体验。我们的目标是为受脆性 X 相关疾病影响的社区探索使用此类计划的经验:定性研究包括对 16 名脆性 X 相关疾病患者或其照顾者(n = 4 名成年突变携带者;n = 12 名儿童/成人的父母/照顾者)进行个人半结构式访谈,他们至少参加了三个在线同伴支持项目中的一个:教育网络研讨会、Facebook 讨论组和通过 Zoom 进行的小型同伴小组会议。研究采用了反思性主题分析法来确定主题:与经验有关的三大主题如下:(1) 分享经验的不确定性和价值,(2) 在医疗保健方面的支持,(3) 在线的优势,但仍需要面对面的活动。尽管人们对信息的需求各不相同,但教育网络研讨会被认为是有关脆性 X 相关病症的宝贵信息来源。Facebook 讨论组使人们能够与他人建立联系,尽管参与者对讨论组的组织方式表达了一些不同的偏好。Zoom同伴小组会议被认为有助于参与者感受到他人的支持,但组织的一致性也很重要:在线同伴支持计划被认为是有益的,它弥补了信息差距,促进了社会联系。然而,参与者认为仍有必要举办面对面的活动,一些人认为教育性网络研讨会并不总能满足他们的需求,还有一些人担心隐私问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
期刊最新文献
The influence of assistance in home-based exercise programmes for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The risk of type 2-diabetes among persons with intellectual disability: a Danish population-based matched cohort study. Issue Information Sleep problems of children with Down syndrome in northern China. 'It's especially good just to know that you're not the only one': a qualitative study exploring experiences with online peer support programmes for the Fragile X community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1