Predictive Blood Biomarkers of Targeted Intervention for Chronic Mental Health Symptoms following Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0245
Shawn R Eagle, Sarah E Svirsky, Ava M Puccio, Allison Borrasso, Kathryn Edelman, Sue Beers, Denes Agoston, Ryan Soose, Michael Collins, Anthony Kontos, Walter Schneider, David O Okonkwo
{"title":"Predictive Blood Biomarkers of Targeted Intervention for Chronic Mental Health Symptoms following Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Shawn R Eagle, Sarah E Svirsky, Ava M Puccio, Allison Borrasso, Kathryn Edelman, Sue Beers, Denes Agoston, Ryan Soose, Michael Collins, Anthony Kontos, Walter Schneider, David O Okonkwo","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of predictive blood biomarkers for responsiveness to targeted treatments for chronic psychological issues years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of TBI was a prospective 6-month interventional trial of participants with chronic TBI sequelae (<i>n</i> = 95). Plasma biomarkers were analyzed pre-intervention: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, hyperphosphorylated tau Thr231 (p-Tau), von Willebrand factor (vWF), brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), vascular endothelial growth factor-a (VEGFa), and claudin-5 (CLDN5). Clinical outcomes included the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Regression models were built for change in PCL5/BSI-18. Biomarkers and covariates were included. Two models were built to identify responders (improved beyond the minimum clinically important difference). The model to predict change in PCL5 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.64; <i>p</i> < 0.001) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.032), BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.001), tau (<i>p</i> = 0.002), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.015), female sex (<i>p</i> = 0.06), and military status (<i>p</i> = 0.014). The model to predict change in BSI-18 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.003) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.042), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.09), BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.01), CLDN5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), female sex (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and military status (<i>p</i> = 0.004) as predictors. The model to differentiate participants who improved for PCL5 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.001; AUC = 0.93) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.02), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.008), and BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.006). The model to differentiate participants who improved for BSI-18 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.25; <i>p</i> = 0.04; AUC = 0.75) included UCH-L1 (<i>p</i> = 0.03), GFAP (<i>p</i> = 0.06), and vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Combinations of pre-intervention blood biomarkers were able to differentiate responders from nonresponders in both post-traumatic stress and overall psychological health domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of predictive blood biomarkers for responsiveness to targeted treatments for chronic psychological issues years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of TBI was a prospective 6-month interventional trial of participants with chronic TBI sequelae (n = 95). Plasma biomarkers were analyzed pre-intervention: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, hyperphosphorylated tau Thr231 (p-Tau), von Willebrand factor (vWF), brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), vascular endothelial growth factor-a (VEGFa), and claudin-5 (CLDN5). Clinical outcomes included the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Regression models were built for change in PCL5/BSI-18. Biomarkers and covariates were included. Two models were built to identify responders (improved beyond the minimum clinically important difference). The model to predict change in PCL5 (R2=0.64; p < 0.001) included vWF (p = 0.032), BLBP (p = 0.001), tau (p = 0.002), VEGFa (p = 0.015), female sex (p = 0.06), and military status (p = 0.014). The model to predict change in BSI-18 (R2=0.42; p = 0.003) included vWF (p = 0.042), VEGFa (p = 0.09), BLBP (p = 0.01), CLDN5 (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.012), and military status (p = 0.004) as predictors. The model to differentiate participants who improved for PCL5 (R2=0.68; p < 0.001; AUC = 0.93) included vWF (p = 0.02), VEGFa (p = 0.008), and BLBP (p = 0.006). The model to differentiate participants who improved for BSI-18 (R2=0.25; p = 0.04; AUC = 0.75) included UCH-L1 (p = 0.03), GFAP (p = 0.06), and vWF (p = 0.03). Combinations of pre-intervention blood biomarkers were able to differentiate responders from nonresponders in both post-traumatic stress and overall psychological health domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脑损伤后慢性精神健康症状定向干预的预测性血液生物标志物。
本研究旨在评估预测性血液生物标志物在预测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)数年后慢性心理问题靶向治疗反应方面的性能。创伤性脑损伤靶向评估行动与监测(TEAM-TBI)是一项为期六个月的前瞻性干预试验,参加者均为创伤性脑损伤慢性后遗症患者(95 人)。干预前分析了血浆生物标志物:胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、tau、高磷酸化tau Thr231(p-Tau)、von Willebrand因子(vWF)、脑脂结合蛋白(BLBP)、泛素C端水解酶-L1(UCH-L1)、血管内皮生长因子-a(VEGFa)和Claudin-5(CLDN5)。临床结果包括创伤后应激障碍核对表 DSM-5(PCL-5)和症状简明量表-18(BSI-18)。根据 PCL5/BSI-18 的变化建立回归模型。生物标志物和协变量也包括在内。建立了两个模型来识别应答者(改善程度超过最小临床重要差异)。预测 PCL5 变化的模型(R2=0.64;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury. Altered Dynamic Brain Functional Network Connectivity Related to Visual Network in Spinal Cord Injury. Genetic Differences Modify Anesthetic Preconditioning of Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila. Measuring Self-Efficacy for Concussion Recovery: Psychometric Characteristics of the Progressive Activities of Controlled Exertion-Self-Efficacy Scale. Correction to: Impact of Low-Level Blast Exposure on Brain Function after a One-Day Tactile Training and the Ameliorating Effect of a Jugular Vein Compression Neck Collar Device; DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5737.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1