Low Risk of Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injury in Children Who Tumble Down Stairs.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161902
Donna C Koo, Jennifer Xie, Mitchell R Price, Samuel Z Soffer, Lawrence Bodenstein
{"title":"Low Risk of Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injury in Children Who Tumble Down Stairs.","authors":"Donna C Koo, Jennifer Xie, Mitchell R Price, Samuel Z Soffer, Lawrence Bodenstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric trauma management seeks to minimize head computed tomography (HCT) while capturing clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) system stratifies patients as high-, intermediate-, or low-risk for ciTBI. Although designed for free falls, we noted that PECARN criteria often are applied to tumbling down stairs (TDS), with steps estimated at 12\", though TDS rarely appeared to result in ciTBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective chart review of pediatric TDS patients, data was collected on mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, imaging, and incidence of ciTBI. PECARN scores were developed under three models: TDS-12 (12″ steps), TDS-8 (more accurate 8\" steps), and TDS-0 (TDS not a severe mechanism).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>344 patients met criteria for study inclusion. Mean age was 6.3 years and 89 (26%) were <2 years. No patients had ciTBI. This included 88 patients who tumbled down 12 steps or more. Across all models, the same 7 patients (2.0%) were at high-risk for ciTBI. Intermediate- and low-risk cohorts were 287 (83%) and 50 (15%) for TDS-12, 171 (50%) and 166 (48%) for TDS-8, and 16 (4.7%) and 321 (93%) for TDS-0, respectively for each model. Under TDS-8, 116 (34%) patients shifted to the low-risk category. Under TDS-0, 271 (79%) patients shifted to the low-risk category, leaving only 23 patients (6.7%) at high- or intermediate-risk (n = 7, 16, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pediatric patients, the risk of ciTBI after TDS is low. TDS should not be treated as a free fall in risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Type of study: </strong>Retrospective Modeling Study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric trauma management seeks to minimize head computed tomography (HCT) while capturing clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) system stratifies patients as high-, intermediate-, or low-risk for ciTBI. Although designed for free falls, we noted that PECARN criteria often are applied to tumbling down stairs (TDS), with steps estimated at 12", though TDS rarely appeared to result in ciTBI.

Methods: In a retrospective chart review of pediatric TDS patients, data was collected on mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, imaging, and incidence of ciTBI. PECARN scores were developed under three models: TDS-12 (12″ steps), TDS-8 (more accurate 8" steps), and TDS-0 (TDS not a severe mechanism).

Results: 344 patients met criteria for study inclusion. Mean age was 6.3 years and 89 (26%) were <2 years. No patients had ciTBI. This included 88 patients who tumbled down 12 steps or more. Across all models, the same 7 patients (2.0%) were at high-risk for ciTBI. Intermediate- and low-risk cohorts were 287 (83%) and 50 (15%) for TDS-12, 171 (50%) and 166 (48%) for TDS-8, and 16 (4.7%) and 321 (93%) for TDS-0, respectively for each model. Under TDS-8, 116 (34%) patients shifted to the low-risk category. Under TDS-0, 271 (79%) patients shifted to the low-risk category, leaving only 23 patients (6.7%) at high- or intermediate-risk (n = 7, 16, respectively).

Conclusions: In pediatric patients, the risk of ciTBI after TDS is low. TDS should not be treated as a free fall in risk assessment.

Type of study: Retrospective Modeling Study.

Level of evidence: Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从楼梯上滚落的儿童发生临床重要创伤性脑损伤的风险很低。
背景:儿科创伤管理旨在尽量减少头部计算机断层扫描(HCT),同时捕捉临床上重要的创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI)。儿科急救护理应用研究网络(PECARN)系统将患者分为高危、中危和低危三类。虽然 PECARN 是针对自由落体而设计的,但我们注意到 PECARN 标准经常被应用于从楼梯上翻滚(TDS),台阶估计为 12 英寸,但 TDS 似乎很少导致 ciTBI:方法:在对儿科 TDS 患者进行的回顾性病历审查中,收集了有关损伤机制、临床表现、影像学和 ciTBI 发生率的数据。根据三种模型制定了 PECARN 评分:TDS-12(12英寸台阶)、TDS-8(更精确的8英寸台阶)和TDS-0(TDS非严重机制):344名患者符合研究纳入标准。平均年龄为 6.3 岁,89 人(26%)为结论:在儿童患者中,TDS 后发生 ciTBI 的风险较低。在风险评估中,不应将 TDS 视为自由落体:回顾性模型研究:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Announcements of Future Meetings Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: National Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Utilization Prevent Injury by Providing Evidence. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of Laparoscopic vs Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1