Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Surgery after Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Adjuvant Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/jso.27920
Marco Schiavon, Giorgio Cannone, Luca Bertolaccini, Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Federica Pezzuto, Giulia Lorenzoni, Francesco Facciolo, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Fiorella Calabrese, Federico Rea, Giulia Pasello
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Surgery after Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Adjuvant Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Study.","authors":"Marco Schiavon, Giorgio Cannone, Luca Bertolaccini, Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Federica Pezzuto, Giulia Lorenzoni, Francesco Facciolo, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Fiorella Calabrese, Federico Rea, Giulia Pasello","doi":"10.1002/jso.27920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination.

Methods: We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation.

Results: Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%.

Conclusions: Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点辅助抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌后进行挽救性手术的安全性和有效性:一项多中心研究。
目的:对于晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)可获得显著的临床反应。这就提出了是否考虑将挽救性手术作为治愈性治疗方案的问题。少数病例系列报告了令人鼓舞的病理反应结果。然而,术中风险和术后发病率一直是关注的焦点。本研究旨在评估使用 ICIs 后手术的安全性和可行性,并评估其对最终病理检查的有效性:我们回顾性地识别了在三个国家中心(2016-2022 年)接受 ICIs 后进行根治性手术的 III-IVA 期 NSCLC 连续患者。治疗前,经多学科讨论,所有患者均被认为不可切除。术后,根据国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)的建议对病理反应进行评估:结果:共纳入31例患者;治疗前临床分期为IIIA期的患者有4例(10%):结果:共纳入31例患者;治疗前临床分期为:IIIA期4例(10%),IIIB期13例(42%),IIIC期3例(13%),IVA期11例(35%)。中位治疗时间为四个周期。只进行了解剖性切除,主要切除类型为肺叶切除术(22 例患者,占 74%)。10名患者(32%)采用了微创方法,转化率为0%。8名患者(25%)出现术后并发症。完全病理反应(CPR)和主要病理反应(MPR)分别为48%和16%。2年和3年生存率分别为88%:根据我们的经验,对接受 ICIs 治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者进行挽救性手术证实了其可行性和安全性。此外,它还具有低发病率、高心肺复苏率和令人满意的中期生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Intraoperative Anesthesiology Provider Handovers on Postoperative Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery. Comment On: "Factors Influencing Prophylactic Surgical Intervention in Women With Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer". Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1