Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the patient with obesity.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004411
Mallory Loe, Jacob M Broome, Lauren Mueller, John T Simpson, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne
{"title":"Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the patient with obesity.","authors":"Mallory Loe, Jacob M Broome, Lauren Mueller, John T Simpson, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palpation of anatomic landmarks is difficult in patients with obesity, which could increase difficulty of achieving femoral access and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) placement. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and successful REBOA placement. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI) would decrease first-attempt success and increase time to successful aortic occlusion (AO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was performed on patients who underwent REBOA placement with initiation systolic blood pressure >0 mm Hg from years 2013-2022. Patients were excluded if they received cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, underwent open AO, or missing data entries for variables of interest. Body mass index categorization was as follows: non-obese (<30), class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (40+) obesity. Patients were also stratified by access technique, including use of palpation or ultrasound guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 410 patients. On binary analysis, no primary outcomes of interest, including rate of success, time to placement, or mortality, were significantly impacted by BMI. Among BMI subgroups, there was no statistical difference in injury severity, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), or augmented SBP. At initiation of aortic occlusion, patients with class II and class III obesity had higher median SBP compared with non- and class I obese patients ( p = 0.03). Body mass index subgroup did not impact likelihood of first-attempt success or conversion to open procedure. When stratified by access technique, there was no difference in success rates, time to success or mortality between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body habitus did not impact success of REBOA placement, time to successful AO, or mortality. Further, ultrasound guidance was not superior to landmark palpation for arterial access. Following traumatic injury without hemodynamic collapse, obesity should not deter providers from considering REBOA placement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palpation of anatomic landmarks is difficult in patients with obesity, which could increase difficulty of achieving femoral access and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) placement. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and successful REBOA placement. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI) would decrease first-attempt success and increase time to successful aortic occlusion (AO).

Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was performed on patients who underwent REBOA placement with initiation systolic blood pressure >0 mm Hg from years 2013-2022. Patients were excluded if they received cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, underwent open AO, or missing data entries for variables of interest. Body mass index categorization was as follows: non-obese (<30), class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (40+) obesity. Patients were also stratified by access technique, including use of palpation or ultrasound guidance.

Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 410 patients. On binary analysis, no primary outcomes of interest, including rate of success, time to placement, or mortality, were significantly impacted by BMI. Among BMI subgroups, there was no statistical difference in injury severity, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), or augmented SBP. At initiation of aortic occlusion, patients with class II and class III obesity had higher median SBP compared with non- and class I obese patients ( p = 0.03). Body mass index subgroup did not impact likelihood of first-attempt success or conversion to open procedure. When stratified by access technique, there was no difference in success rates, time to success or mortality between groups.

Conclusion: Body habitus did not impact success of REBOA placement, time to successful AO, or mortality. Further, ultrasound guidance was not superior to landmark palpation for arterial access. Following traumatic injury without hemodynamic collapse, obesity should not deter providers from considering REBOA placement.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖症患者的主动脉血管内球囊闭塞抢救。
背景:肥胖患者很难触摸到解剖标志,这可能会增加股动脉入路和主动脉复苏性血管内球囊闭塞(REBOA)置入的难度。本研究的主要目的是探讨肥胖与成功置入 REBOA 之间的关系。我们假设体重指数(BMI)越高,首次尝试成功率越低,主动脉闭塞(AO)成功的时间越长:方法:我们对 2013-2022 年间接受 REBOA 置入术且起始收缩压大于 0 mm Hg 的患者进行了创伤和急诊外科主动脉闭塞复苏(AORTA)登记审查。如果患者在到达时接受了心肺复苏、接受了开放性 AO 或相关变量数据缺失,则将其排除在外。体质指数分类如下:非肥胖(结果:410 人符合纳入标准);肥胖(结果:410 人符合纳入标准);非肥胖(结果:410 人符合纳入标准):410 名患者符合纳入标准。通过二元分析,成功率、置管时间或死亡率等主要结果均未受到体重指数的显著影响。在 BMI 亚组中,损伤严重程度、入院收缩压 (SBP) 或增高的 SBP 没有统计学差异。与非肥胖和一级肥胖患者相比,二级和三级肥胖患者在开始主动脉闭塞时的中位 SBP 较高(P = 0.03)。体重指数亚组并不影响首次尝试成功或转为开放手术的可能性。根据入路技术进行分层后,不同组别的成功率、成功时间或死亡率均无差异:结论:体型并不影响REBOA置管的成功率、AO成功时间或死亡率。此外,在动脉通路方面,超声引导并不优于地标触诊。在没有血流动力学衰竭的创伤后,肥胖不应该阻止医护人员考虑置入REBOA:证据级别:治疗/护理管理,观察性,横断面;IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers. How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know. Not all call is created equally: The impact of culture and sex on burnout related to in-house call. Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1