{"title":"The perfusion index as a method of assessing epidural anaesthesia efficacy in healthy dogs.","authors":"Harumichi Itoh, Hajime Inoue, Takuya Itamoto, Kenji Tani, Hiroshi Sunahara, Yuki Nemoto, Munekazu Nakaichi, Toshie Iseri, Kazuhito Itamoto","doi":"10.2478/jvetres-2024-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perfusion index (PI) is used as assessment of epidural anaesthesia efficacy in human medicine, but its usefulness in dogs is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PI in determining epidural anaesthesia effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is prospective cross-over experimental study. Five healthy adult beagle dogs were anaesthetised and an epidural catheter was inserted in the lumbosacral area and adjusted so that the end of the catheter was placed at the fourth lumbar vertebra. Single-port catheters were used in the control group and multiple-port catheters were used in the treatment group. A PI probe was placed on a hind leg, and the catheter placement was confirmed <i>via</i> computed tomography. The treatment group received a bolus dose of lidocaine, and the control group received saline, <i>via</i> epidural catheter. The PI value was recorded every 5 min until 30 min after lidocaine injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PIs of the hind limbs were not significantly different over time, nor were they between the control and lidocaine-injected groups at any point in time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PI is not useful in determining the efficacy of epidural anaesthesia in dogs under general anaesthesia. In the future, finding a reliable method to evaluate the success of regional anaesthesia, even in patients under general anaesthesia, will be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":17617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"68 3","pages":"469-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Perfusion index (PI) is used as assessment of epidural anaesthesia efficacy in human medicine, but its usefulness in dogs is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PI in determining epidural anaesthesia effectiveness.
Material and methods: This is prospective cross-over experimental study. Five healthy adult beagle dogs were anaesthetised and an epidural catheter was inserted in the lumbosacral area and adjusted so that the end of the catheter was placed at the fourth lumbar vertebra. Single-port catheters were used in the control group and multiple-port catheters were used in the treatment group. A PI probe was placed on a hind leg, and the catheter placement was confirmed via computed tomography. The treatment group received a bolus dose of lidocaine, and the control group received saline, via epidural catheter. The PI value was recorded every 5 min until 30 min after lidocaine injection.
Results: The PIs of the hind limbs were not significantly different over time, nor were they between the control and lidocaine-injected groups at any point in time.
Conclusion: The PI is not useful in determining the efficacy of epidural anaesthesia in dogs under general anaesthesia. In the future, finding a reliable method to evaluate the success of regional anaesthesia, even in patients under general anaesthesia, will be necessary.
简介灌注指数(PI)在人类医学中被用来评估硬膜外麻醉的效果,但它在狗身上的用处尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估灌注指数在确定硬膜外麻醉效果方面的作用:这是一项前瞻性交叉实验研究。对五只健康的成年小猎犬进行麻醉,并在腰骶部插入硬膜外导管,调整导管末端,使其位于第四腰椎处。对照组使用单孔导管,治疗组使用多孔导管。在后腿上放置 PI 探针,并通过计算机断层扫描确认导管位置。治疗组通过硬膜外导管注射利多卡因,对照组注射生理盐水。在注射利多卡因后的 30 分钟内,每 5 分钟记录一次 PI 值:结果:后肢的 PI 随时间变化无显著差异,对照组和注射利多卡因组之间在任何时间点也无显著差异:结论:PI 对于确定全身麻醉下硬膜外麻醉的疗效没有帮助。今后,有必要找到一种可靠的方法来评估区域麻醉的成功率,即使是对全身麻醉的患者也是如此。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Veterinary Research (formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy) is a quarterly that publishes original papers, review articles and short communications on bacteriology, virology, parasitology, immunology, molecular biology, pathology, toxicology, pharmacology, and biochemistry. The main emphasis is, however, on infectious diseases of animals, food safety and public health, and clinical sciences.