Comparison of Risk Factors for Early Seizures Between Angiogram-Negative and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02120-0
Ariyaporn Haripottawekul, Ava Stipanovich, Karen L Furie, Michael E Reznik, Ali Mahta
{"title":"Comparison of Risk Factors for Early Seizures Between Angiogram-Negative and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Ariyaporn Haripottawekul, Ava Stipanovich, Karen L Furie, Michael E Reznik, Ali Mahta","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02120-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-onset seizures are common in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), with risk factors that have been explored. However, early-onset seizures in patients with angiogram-negative nonperimesencephalic SAH (an-SAH) are less understood. We sought to compare the incidence and risk factors of early-onset seizures between these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to an academic center between July 2016 and July 2023. Patients were categorized into aSAH or an-SAH based on imaging findings. Clinical data and electroencephalogram findings were retrieved and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for clinical or electrographic seizures, as well as other epileptic features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 473 patients (63% female) in the final analysis, of whom 79 had an-SAH and 394 had aSAH. Patients with an-SAH were older (mean age 61.9 years [standard deviation 15.9] vs. 56.7 [standard deviation 13.4]; p = 0.02). The rate of clinical or electrographic seizures was similar between the two groups (13% in aSAH vs. 11% in an-SAH; p = 0.62). Highly epileptic features (electrographic seizures, ictal-interictal continuum, and periodic epileptic discharges) occurred more frequently in the aSAH group compared with the an-SAH group, although this difference was not significant (15% vs. 8%; p = 0.09). Risk factors for seizures in aSAH were Hunt and Hess grade (odds ratio [OR] 1.25 per grade increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.49; p = 0.011), modified Fisher score (OR 1.64 per point increase, 95% CI 1.25-2.15; p < 0.001), cerebral infarct (OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.13-6.23; p < 0.001), and intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 10, 95% CI 1.35-76.9; p = 0.017). However, none of these factors were associated with seizures in an-SAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early-onset seizures occur at similar rates in patients with an-SAH and aSAH. However, seizure risk factors appear to differ between these groups. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify predictors of seizures in patients with an-SAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"410-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02120-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early-onset seizures are common in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), with risk factors that have been explored. However, early-onset seizures in patients with angiogram-negative nonperimesencephalic SAH (an-SAH) are less understood. We sought to compare the incidence and risk factors of early-onset seizures between these groups.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to an academic center between July 2016 and July 2023. Patients were categorized into aSAH or an-SAH based on imaging findings. Clinical data and electroencephalogram findings were retrieved and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for clinical or electrographic seizures, as well as other epileptic features.

Results: We included 473 patients (63% female) in the final analysis, of whom 79 had an-SAH and 394 had aSAH. Patients with an-SAH were older (mean age 61.9 years [standard deviation 15.9] vs. 56.7 [standard deviation 13.4]; p = 0.02). The rate of clinical or electrographic seizures was similar between the two groups (13% in aSAH vs. 11% in an-SAH; p = 0.62). Highly epileptic features (electrographic seizures, ictal-interictal continuum, and periodic epileptic discharges) occurred more frequently in the aSAH group compared with the an-SAH group, although this difference was not significant (15% vs. 8%; p = 0.09). Risk factors for seizures in aSAH were Hunt and Hess grade (odds ratio [OR] 1.25 per grade increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.49; p = 0.011), modified Fisher score (OR 1.64 per point increase, 95% CI 1.25-2.15; p < 0.001), cerebral infarct (OR 3.64, 95% CI 2.13-6.23; p < 0.001), and intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 10, 95% CI 1.35-76.9; p = 0.017). However, none of these factors were associated with seizures in an-SAH.

Conclusions: Early-onset seizures occur at similar rates in patients with an-SAH and aSAH. However, seizure risk factors appear to differ between these groups. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify predictors of seizures in patients with an-SAH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管造影阴性和动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血早期癫痫发作风险因素的比较。
背景:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)中早发的癫痫发作很常见,其风险因素已得到探讨。然而,人们对血管造影阴性的非蛛网膜下腔出血(an-SAH)患者的早发性癫痫发作了解较少。我们试图比较这两类患者的早发性癫痫发作的发生率和风险因素:我们对一家学术中心在 2016 年 7 月至 2023 年 7 月期间连续收治的一组患者进行了回顾性研究。根据影像学检查结果将患者分为aSAH和an-SAH两组。对临床数据和脑电图结果进行了检索和分析。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定临床或脑电图癫痫发作的风险因素以及其他癫痫特征:我们在最终分析中纳入了 473 例患者(63% 为女性),其中 79 例为 an-SAH 患者,394 例为 aSAH 患者。an-SAH患者年龄较大(平均年龄61.9岁[标准差15.9]对56.7岁[标准差13.4];P = 0.02)。两组患者的临床或电图癫痫发作率相似(aSAH 为 13% vs. an-SAH 为 11%;p = 0.62)。高度癫痫特征(电图癫痫发作、发作-发作间期连续性和周期性癫痫放电)在aSAH组比在an-SAH组发生得更频繁,尽管这一差异并不显著(15%对8%;P = 0.09)。aSAH患者癫痫发作的风险因素是Hunt和Hess分级(每升一级的几率比[OR]为1.25,95%置信区间[CI]为1.05-1.49;P = 0.011)、改良Fisher评分(每升一级的几率比[OR]为1.64,95%置信区间[CI]为1.25-2.15;P 结论:an-SAH和aSAH患者的早发性癫痫发作率相似。然而,这两组患者的癫痫发作风险因素似乎有所不同。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确定an-SAH患者癫痫发作的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Neuroprognostication After Cardiac Arrest: From Test-Centered Prediction to Ethically Constrained, Longitudinal Decision-Making. Evaluation of a Novel Automated Cerebral Ventricular Drainage System for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Neurocritical Care Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study. A Longitudinal Imaging and Clinical Data Workflow Identifies Potential Time-Dependent Risk Factors for Post-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Epilepsy. Harnessing Scalp Gamma Oscillations to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Periodic Discharges. Vital Prognosis and Causes of Death in Adults with Encephalitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1