V Ricciuti, E Peppucci, A Montalbetti, G Piras, G Spena, C G Giussani, C Zoia
{"title":"Endoscopic transorbital approach for recurrent spheno-orbital meningiomas: single center case series.","authors":"V Ricciuti, E Peppucci, A Montalbetti, G Piras, G Spena, C G Giussani, C Zoia","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-02905-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs) are finding wide application for skull base lesions, particularly for spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). These tumors have high recurrence rates, and second surgery can often represent a challenge. In this study we analyze our experience of management of recurrent SOMs through a slightly modified eyelid crease approach. Between May 2016 and September 2023, in the Department of Neurosurgery of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy), five consecutive recurrent SOMs have been treated using an endoscopic transorbital approach. Demographic data, preoperatory deficits, lesions characteristics, histology, grade of resection, eventual adjuvant treatments, complications, outcome in terms of symptoms improvement and cosmesis, and hospitalization are described. One patient maintained a right lateral rectus muscle palsy that was already present in the preoperatory, no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were reported. All patients had postoperative periorbital edema, but no other systemic complication was found. All patients had proptosis improvement, two had visual acuity improvement, and best cosmetic outcome was obtained in all cases. Hospitalization varied between 4 and 6 days. ETOAs in the management of recurrent SOMs are safe and have good outcome. Right selection of patients is mandatory, but when feasible, endoscopic surgery can allow a virgin route to a previously operated tumor, guaranteeing a good strategic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02905-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs) are finding wide application for skull base lesions, particularly for spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). These tumors have high recurrence rates, and second surgery can often represent a challenge. In this study we analyze our experience of management of recurrent SOMs through a slightly modified eyelid crease approach. Between May 2016 and September 2023, in the Department of Neurosurgery of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy), five consecutive recurrent SOMs have been treated using an endoscopic transorbital approach. Demographic data, preoperatory deficits, lesions characteristics, histology, grade of resection, eventual adjuvant treatments, complications, outcome in terms of symptoms improvement and cosmesis, and hospitalization are described. One patient maintained a right lateral rectus muscle palsy that was already present in the preoperatory, no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were reported. All patients had postoperative periorbital edema, but no other systemic complication was found. All patients had proptosis improvement, two had visual acuity improvement, and best cosmetic outcome was obtained in all cases. Hospitalization varied between 4 and 6 days. ETOAs in the management of recurrent SOMs are safe and have good outcome. Right selection of patients is mandatory, but when feasible, endoscopic surgery can allow a virgin route to a previously operated tumor, guaranteeing a good strategic option.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.