Optimized microvascular decompression surgery for improving the results of hemifacial spasm: an analysis of reoperations.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02892-1
Zhu Wanchun, Liu Zhenxing, Zhao Hua, Li Shiting
{"title":"Optimized microvascular decompression surgery for improving the results of hemifacial spasm: an analysis of reoperations.","authors":"Zhu Wanchun, Liu Zhenxing, Zhao Hua, Li Shiting","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-02892-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery is an effective curative treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS). This study aims to establish techniques that may lead to favorable outcomes by analyzing reoperations in patients with persistent or recurrent HFS.Patients who exhibited persistent or recurrent HFS symptoms after prior MVD surgery were identified as candidates for reoperation. Information regarding the reoperations was collected by tracing the entire surgical procedures and peri-operative management. Clinical manifestations and follow-up data were obtained from the hospital records and subsequent visits.Twenty-six patients underwent repeat MVD surgery. Among them, multi-culprit neurovascular compression (NVC) was identified as the primary cause of failure to response to the previous operation in 73.08% of cases. Pure tissue adhesion accounted for 38.46% of cases, while shredded Teflon pledget (STP) shifting was observed in 7.69% of cases. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through revisits and categorized into four groups: excellent (76.92%), good (15.38%), fair (7.69%), and poor (0%). The longest follow-up period exceeded 65 moths.The trans-lateral suboccipital infra-floccular approach provides a better visual field. Examination of entire length of the facial nerve is essential. STP with gelatin sponge implantation is a suitable material for facilitating nerve and vascular positioning and reducing adhesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02892-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery is an effective curative treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS). This study aims to establish techniques that may lead to favorable outcomes by analyzing reoperations in patients with persistent or recurrent HFS.Patients who exhibited persistent or recurrent HFS symptoms after prior MVD surgery were identified as candidates for reoperation. Information regarding the reoperations was collected by tracing the entire surgical procedures and peri-operative management. Clinical manifestations and follow-up data were obtained from the hospital records and subsequent visits.Twenty-six patients underwent repeat MVD surgery. Among them, multi-culprit neurovascular compression (NVC) was identified as the primary cause of failure to response to the previous operation in 73.08% of cases. Pure tissue adhesion accounted for 38.46% of cases, while shredded Teflon pledget (STP) shifting was observed in 7.69% of cases. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through revisits and categorized into four groups: excellent (76.92%), good (15.38%), fair (7.69%), and poor (0%). The longest follow-up period exceeded 65 moths.The trans-lateral suboccipital infra-floccular approach provides a better visual field. Examination of entire length of the facial nerve is essential. STP with gelatin sponge implantation is a suitable material for facilitating nerve and vascular positioning and reducing adhesion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化微血管减压手术以改善半面痉挛的治疗效果:对再次手术的分析。
微血管减压(MVD)手术是治疗半面肌痉挛(HFS)的有效方法。本研究旨在通过分析持续性或复发性半面肌痉挛患者的再手术情况,确定可带来良好疗效的技术。通过追踪整个手术过程和围手术期处理情况,收集有关再次手术的信息。临床表现和随访数据来自住院记录和后续就诊记录。其中,73.08%的病例确认多脏器神经血管压迫(NVC)是导致前次手术失败的主要原因。38.46%的病例为单纯组织粘连,7.69%的病例出现特氟龙碎块(STP)移位。术后效果通过复诊进行评估,并分为四组:优(76.92%)、良(15.38%)、一般(7.69%)和差(0%)。最长的随访时间超过 65 个月。面神经全长的检查至关重要。植入明胶海绵的 STP 是促进神经和血管定位、减少粘连的合适材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Advantage and challenges in the use of 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in neurosurgery. Comment on - Is add-on Bevacizumab therapy to Temozolomide and radiotherapy associated with clinical utility for newly diagnosed Glioblastoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comment on "A randomized controlled trial of social media promotion in neurosurgical publishing". Comment on "Comparison of LVIS and enterprise stent-assisted coiling embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study". Comment on "Treatment factors to suppress delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on VASOGRADE: multicenter cohort study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1