Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition-defined malnutrition coexisting with visceral adiposity predicted worse long-term all-cause mortality among inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Nutrition & Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1038/s41387-024-00336-9
Han Wang, Tianming Zhao, Gaoyue Guo, Wanting Yang, Xuqian Zhang, Fang Yang, Jie Yang, Yangyang Hui, Xiaoyu Wang, Binxin Cui, Xiaofei Fan, Huanli Jiao, Chao Sun
{"title":"Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition-defined malnutrition coexisting with visceral adiposity predicted worse long-term all-cause mortality among inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis.","authors":"Han Wang, Tianming Zhao, Gaoyue Guo, Wanting Yang, Xuqian Zhang, Fang Yang, Jie Yang, Yangyang Hui, Xiaoyu Wang, Binxin Cui, Xiaofei Fan, Huanli Jiao, Chao Sun","doi":"10.1038/s41387-024-00336-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Malnutrition coexisting with abdominal adipose tissue accumulation bring a double burden on prognosis. More recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has reached a novel consensus concerning the diagnostic criteria, that is, a two-step modality combining nutritional risk screening and subsequent phenotypic/etiologic parameters for comprehensive evaluation in hopes of harmonizing the malnutrition diagnosis. We aimed to elucidate their synergistic impact among inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis concerning long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>Malnutrition, visceral obesity, and visceral adiposity were defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), visceral fat area (VFA), and visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) on computed tomography, respectively. Accordingly, the patients were categorized into different groups given their nutritional status and visceral obesity/adiposity. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with 1-year all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were compared among distinct groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 295 patients were recruited. GLIM, VFA, and VSR identified 131 (44.4%), 158 (53.6%), and 59 (20%) patients with malnutrition, visceral obesity and visceral adiposity, respectively. Malnutrition coexisted with visceral obesity in 55 (MO group) relative to visceral adiposity in 40 patients (MA group). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that MA (hazard ratio: 2.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 5.79; P = 0.036) was independently associated with dire outcome rather than MO. Moreover, patients with cirrhosis in the MA group had the worst survival status when compared with other groups (log-rank test: P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study indicated that coexisting GLIM-defined malnutrition and VSR-defined visceral adiposity were in relation to worse long-term mortality among inpatients. It is imperative to delicately manage nutritional status and provide personalized treatment in this vulnerable subgroup for achieving better prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19339,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Diabetes","volume":"14 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00336-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Malnutrition coexisting with abdominal adipose tissue accumulation bring a double burden on prognosis. More recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) has reached a novel consensus concerning the diagnostic criteria, that is, a two-step modality combining nutritional risk screening and subsequent phenotypic/etiologic parameters for comprehensive evaluation in hopes of harmonizing the malnutrition diagnosis. We aimed to elucidate their synergistic impact among inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis concerning long-term mortality.

Subjects/methods: Malnutrition, visceral obesity, and visceral adiposity were defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), visceral fat area (VFA), and visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) on computed tomography, respectively. Accordingly, the patients were categorized into different groups given their nutritional status and visceral obesity/adiposity. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with 1-year all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were compared among distinct groups.

Results: Totally, 295 patients were recruited. GLIM, VFA, and VSR identified 131 (44.4%), 158 (53.6%), and 59 (20%) patients with malnutrition, visceral obesity and visceral adiposity, respectively. Malnutrition coexisted with visceral obesity in 55 (MO group) relative to visceral adiposity in 40 patients (MA group). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that MA (hazard ratio: 2.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 5.79; P = 0.036) was independently associated with dire outcome rather than MO. Moreover, patients with cirrhosis in the MA group had the worst survival status when compared with other groups (log-rank test: P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The current study indicated that coexisting GLIM-defined malnutrition and VSR-defined visceral adiposity were in relation to worse long-term mortality among inpatients. It is imperative to delicately manage nutritional status and provide personalized treatment in this vulnerable subgroup for achieving better prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球领导力营养不良倡议 "定义的营养不良与内脏脂肪过多并存,预示着肝硬化失代偿期住院患者的长期全因死亡率更低。
背景/目的:营养不良与腹部脂肪组织堆积同时存在,给预后带来双重负担。最近,全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)就诊断标准达成了新的共识,即采用两步法结合营养风险筛查和随后的表型/病理参数进行综合评估,希望能统一营养不良的诊断。我们的目的是在失代偿期肝硬化住院患者中阐明它们对长期死亡率的协同影响:营养不良、内脏肥胖和内脏脂肪过多分别由全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)、内脏脂肪面积(VFA)和计算机断层扫描的内脏与皮下脂肪组织面积比(VSR)来定义。因此,根据营养状况和内脏肥胖/脂肪过多程度将患者分为不同的组别。为了确定与一年全因死亡率相关的独立风险因素,研究人员进行了多变量考克斯回归。对不同组别的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和对数秩检验进行了比较:共招募了 295 名患者。GLIM、VFA和VSR分别发现131(44.4%)、158(53.6%)和59(20%)名患者存在营养不良、内脏肥胖和内脏脂肪过多。营养不良与内脏肥胖并存的患者有 55 人(MO 组),而内脏肥胖并存的患者有 40 人(MA 组)。多变量 Cox 分析表明,MA(危险比:2.48;95% 置信区间:1.06, 5.79;P = 0.036)比 MO 更容易导致严重后果。此外,与其他组别相比,MA 组肝硬化患者的生存状况最差(log-rank 检验):P 结论:本研究表明,同时存在 GLIM 定义的营养不良和 VSR 定义的内脏脂肪过多与住院患者的长期死亡率较低有关。对这一脆弱的亚组进行精细的营养状况管理并提供个性化治疗,以获得更好的预后,是当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Diabetes
Nutrition & Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Diabetes is a peer-reviewed, online, open access journal bringing to the fore outstanding research in the areas of nutrition and chronic disease, including diabetes, from the molecular to the population level.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Children's Dietary Inflammatory Index and association with prediabetes in U.S. adolescents. Effectiveness of flaxseed consumption and fasting mimicking diet on anthropometric measures, biochemical parameters, and hepatic features in patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): a randomized controlled clinical trial. Anti-obesity effect of irreversible MAO-B inhibitors in patients with Parkinson's disease. Abnormal changes of brain function and structure in patients with T2DM-related cognitive impairment: a neuroimaging meta-analysis and an independent validation. Late eating is associated with poor glucose tolerance, independent of body weight, fat mass, energy intake and diet composition in prediabetes or early onset type 2 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1