Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Risk of Neovascular Glaucoma in Eyes with Prior Retinal Vascular Occlusions.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s40123-024-01039-1
Laura D Palmer, Jared D Peterson, Joni K Evans, Mark H Nelson, Sanjay Asrani, Atalie C Thompson
{"title":"Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Risk of Neovascular Glaucoma in Eyes with Prior Retinal Vascular Occlusions.","authors":"Laura D Palmer, Jared D Peterson, Joni K Evans, Mark H Nelson, Sanjay Asrani, Atalie C Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s40123-024-01039-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the impact of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on the risk of developing neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in eyes with occlusions of the retinal artery (RAO) or retinal vein (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective case-control study of adults with a history of RVO/RAO. Cases (N = 101) who developed NVG were age and sex matched 1:2 to controls who did not develop NVG (N = 202). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between history of PVD and risk of NVG while controlling for other related demographic or clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In initial bivariate analyses, there was no difference in risk of NVG based on eye, lens status, hypertension, history of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), or retinal surgery (all p > 0.10), a borderline difference based on diabetic retinopathy (DR) (p = 0.06) and prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment (p = 0.08), and a significant difference based on race/ethnicity, type of vascular event, and PVD status (all p < 0.05). In the final multivariable model, patients without PVD were significantly more likely to develop NVG (OR = 3.07, p = 0.0001) independent of the other covariates. Risk of NVG was greater in those with DR (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0440) and in those with central RVO vs. branch RVO/hemiretinal RVO (OR = 5.77, p < 0.0001). Non-White/Non-Hispanics (OR = 2.56, p = 0.0051) and Hispanics (OR = 3.65, p = 0.0288) were more likely than White patients to develop NVG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression to NVG after retinal vascular occlusion is more likely in Non-White/Hispanic patients, those with concomitant DR, and those with CRVO/CRAO. The absence of PVD increases the risk for NVG. Further studies are necessary to understand this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3013-3024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01039-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the impact of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on the risk of developing neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in eyes with occlusions of the retinal artery (RAO) or retinal vein (RVO).

Methods: Single-center retrospective case-control study of adults with a history of RVO/RAO. Cases (N = 101) who developed NVG were age and sex matched 1:2 to controls who did not develop NVG (N = 202). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between history of PVD and risk of NVG while controlling for other related demographic or clinical factors.

Results: In initial bivariate analyses, there was no difference in risk of NVG based on eye, lens status, hypertension, history of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), or retinal surgery (all p > 0.10), a borderline difference based on diabetic retinopathy (DR) (p = 0.06) and prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment (p = 0.08), and a significant difference based on race/ethnicity, type of vascular event, and PVD status (all p < 0.05). In the final multivariable model, patients without PVD were significantly more likely to develop NVG (OR = 3.07, p = 0.0001) independent of the other covariates. Risk of NVG was greater in those with DR (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0440) and in those with central RVO vs. branch RVO/hemiretinal RVO (OR = 5.77, p < 0.0001). Non-White/Non-Hispanics (OR = 2.56, p = 0.0051) and Hispanics (OR = 3.65, p = 0.0288) were more likely than White patients to develop NVG.

Conclusions: Progression to NVG after retinal vascular occlusion is more likely in Non-White/Hispanic patients, those with concomitant DR, and those with CRVO/CRAO. The absence of PVD increases the risk for NVG. Further studies are necessary to understand this relationship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曾有视网膜血管闭塞的眼球后玻璃体脱离和新生血管性青光眼的风险。
简介研究玻璃体后脱离(PVD)对视网膜动脉(RAO)或视网膜静脉(RVO)闭塞患者罹患新生血管性青光眼(NVG)风险的影响:方法:对有 RVO/RAO 病史的成人进行单中心回顾性病例对照研究。出现 NVG 的病例(N = 101)与未出现 NVG 的对照组(N = 202)在年龄和性别上进行 1:2 匹配。在控制其他相关人口学或临床因素的前提下,采用多变量逻辑回归估算心血管病史与 NVG 风险之间的关系:在最初的双变量分析中,根据眼睛、晶状体状态、高血压、全视网膜光凝(PRP)或视网膜手术史,NVG 风险没有差异(所有 p > 0.10),根据糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)(p = 0.06)和之前的抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗(p = 0.08),以及种族/族裔、血管事件类型和 PVD 状态的显著差异(所有 p 均为 0.05):非白种人/西班牙裔患者、同时患有 DR 和 CRVO/CRAO 的患者在视网膜血管闭塞后更有可能发展为 NVG。没有 PVD 会增加 NVG 的风险。要了解这种关系,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Corneal Epitheliotrophic Factors of Undiluted Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Autologous Serum Eye Drops for Dry Eye Disease. A Multicenter Study on Clinical Outcomes of Simultaneous Implantable Collamer Lens Removal and Phacoemulsification with Intraocular Lens Implantation in Eyes Developing Cataract. Randomized Clinical Trial of Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Medications on Preventing Spikes in Intraocular Pressure Following Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections. Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Primary and Secondary Glaucoma: A 5-Year Analysis. The Relevance and Potential Role of Orbital Fat in Inflammatory Orbital Diseases: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1