Role of inpatient rehabilitation facility functional measures to predict community discharge after stroke.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13266
Elizabeth Mangone, Eashan Shahriary, Pamela Bosch
{"title":"Role of inpatient rehabilitation facility functional measures to predict community discharge after stroke.","authors":"Elizabeth Mangone, Eashan Shahriary, Pamela Bosch","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the association between stroke severity, functional status measured by the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI), and community discharge from IRF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aim one examined the association between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores measured during the acute care stay and IRF admission functional status, measured by the admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility functional measures, to deduce if functional measures can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. Aim two investigated the ability of the NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission functional measures to predict community discharge from IRF after stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records and Uniform Data System. Medical Record file data from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2019.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic hospital-based IRF.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Five hundred forty-four patients transferred from acute care hospital to IRF after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Exclusion criteria included a transient ischemic attack, discharge against medical advice, death during IRF stay, or readmission to acute care within 48 hours of IRF admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility scores and discharge status from IRF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 544 patients, 76.7% had community discharge. NIHSS scores were significantly associated with IRF-PAI admission self-care scores across each NIHSS stroke category. There was no statistically significant association between NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission mobility score. IRF admission self-care and mobility scores were each statistically significant predictors of community discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.17; OR = 1.10, CI: 1.03-1.18, respectively). NIHSS scores were not a statistically significant predictor of community discharge (OR = 0.70, CI: 0.47-1.04) from IRF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRF-PAI self-care functional measure is associated with the NIHSS and can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. IRF-PAI self-care and mobility measures each predict community discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the association between stroke severity, functional status measured by the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI), and community discharge from IRF.

Objectives: Aim one examined the association between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores measured during the acute care stay and IRF admission functional status, measured by the admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility functional measures, to deduce if functional measures can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. Aim two investigated the ability of the NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission functional measures to predict community discharge from IRF after stroke.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records and Uniform Data System. Medical Record file data from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2019.

Setting: Academic hospital-based IRF.

Participants: Five hundred forty-four patients transferred from acute care hospital to IRF after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Exclusion criteria included a transient ischemic attack, discharge against medical advice, death during IRF stay, or readmission to acute care within 48 hours of IRF admission.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility scores and discharge status from IRF.

Results: Of the 544 patients, 76.7% had community discharge. NIHSS scores were significantly associated with IRF-PAI admission self-care scores across each NIHSS stroke category. There was no statistically significant association between NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission mobility score. IRF admission self-care and mobility scores were each statistically significant predictors of community discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.17; OR = 1.10, CI: 1.03-1.18, respectively). NIHSS scores were not a statistically significant predictor of community discharge (OR = 0.70, CI: 0.47-1.04) from IRF.

Conclusions: IRF-PAI self-care functional measure is associated with the NIHSS and can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. IRF-PAI self-care and mobility measures each predict community discharge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院康复设施功能测试对预测中风后社区出院的作用。
背景: 本研究调查了脑卒中严重程度、住院康复机构患者评估工具(IRF-PAI)测量的功能状态与 IRF 社区出院之间的关系:本研究调查了脑卒中严重程度、住院康复机构患者评估工具(IRF-PAI)测量的功能状态与 IRF 社区出院之间的关系:目的一:研究美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)急性期评分与 IRF 入院功能状态(通过入院 IRF-PAI 自理和行动功能测量)之间的关系,以推断功能测量是否可作为卒中严重程度的替代指标。目的二:调查 NIHSS 和 IRF-PAI 入院功能测量值预测中风后从 IRF 出院的能力:设计:使用电子病历和统一数据系统进行回顾性队列研究。病历档案数据从 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 30 日:以学术医院为基础的IRF.参与者:缺血性或出血性卒中后从急症医院转入 IRF 的 544 名患者。排除标准包括一过性脑缺血发作、违反医嘱出院、在IRF住院期间死亡或在IRF入院后48小时内再次入院接受急性护理:不适用:入院时的 IRF-PAI 自我护理和行动能力评分以及从 IRF 出院的情况:结果:在 544 名患者中,76.7% 的患者在社区出院。在每个 NIHSS 中风类别中,NIHSS 评分与 IRF-PAI 入院自理能力评分均有显著相关性。NIHSS与IRF-PAI入院活动能力评分之间没有统计学意义上的明显关联。IRF 入院自我护理评分和活动能力评分对社区出院均有统计学意义的预测作用(几率比 [OR] = 1.10,95% 置信区间 [CI]:分别为 1.03-1.17;OR = 1.10,CI:1.03-1.18)。NIHSS评分对从IRF社区出院(OR = 0.70,CI:0.47-1.04)并无统计学意义:结论:IRF-PAI 自我护理功能测量与 NIHSS 相关,可作为卒中严重程度的替代指标。IRF-PAI 自我护理和活动能力测量结果均可预测社区出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1