Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2022 and 2023

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Reproductive toxicology Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108727
Paul Barrow
{"title":"Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2022 and 2023","authors":"Paul Barrow","doi":"10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>92 novel drugs were approved by the FDA in 2022–2023. 48 of these approvals were for orphan indications. Embryofetal development (EFD) studies were conducted for 79 % of approvals. Rats and rabbits were the most common species used (77 % and 62 % of studies, respectively). For the testing of biopharmaceuticals, rodents were more often used (43 % of EFD studies) than non-human primates (29 %) and rabbits (29 %). Most (75 %) biopharmaceuticals intended to treat cancer were approved without EFD studies. Amongst the 41 drugs for which both rat and rabbit EFD studies were performed, the rabbit appeared more sensitive to both maternal toxicity and developmental toxicity (61 % and 63 % of drugs, respectively). Most drugs (76 %) showed more than a 2-fold difference in the LOAEL for developmental toxicity between the rat and rabbit. EFD studies were not required for drugs with a mode of action known to pose a clear hazard for pregnancy and further EFD studies were generally not performed when clinically relevant developmental effects had already been observed in one species or in a preliminary EFD study. Many drug labels showed minor deviations from the PLLR rule: the metric used to calculate exposure margins and the presence or absence of maternal toxicity were not always specified. These omissions, however, are of little significance for the prescriber. The five reviews in this series now show compiled information on EFD studies for all small molecule pharmaceuticals approved since 2014 and for all therapeutic monoclonal antibodies approved to date.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21137,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive toxicology","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 108727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623824001941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

92 novel drugs were approved by the FDA in 2022–2023. 48 of these approvals were for orphan indications. Embryofetal development (EFD) studies were conducted for 79 % of approvals. Rats and rabbits were the most common species used (77 % and 62 % of studies, respectively). For the testing of biopharmaceuticals, rodents were more often used (43 % of EFD studies) than non-human primates (29 %) and rabbits (29 %). Most (75 %) biopharmaceuticals intended to treat cancer were approved without EFD studies. Amongst the 41 drugs for which both rat and rabbit EFD studies were performed, the rabbit appeared more sensitive to both maternal toxicity and developmental toxicity (61 % and 63 % of drugs, respectively). Most drugs (76 %) showed more than a 2-fold difference in the LOAEL for developmental toxicity between the rat and rabbit. EFD studies were not required for drugs with a mode of action known to pose a clear hazard for pregnancy and further EFD studies were generally not performed when clinically relevant developmental effects had already been observed in one species or in a preliminary EFD study. Many drug labels showed minor deviations from the PLLR rule: the metric used to calculate exposure margins and the presence or absence of maternal toxicity were not always specified. These omissions, however, are of little significance for the prescriber. The five reviews in this series now show compiled information on EFD studies for all small molecule pharmaceuticals approved since 2014 and for all therapeutic monoclonal antibodies approved to date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 FDA 于 2022 年和 2023 年批准的药品进行的胚胎-胎儿发育毒性研究进行审查。
2022-2023 年,美国食品和药物管理局批准了 92 种新药。其中 48 项批准用于孤儿适应症。79%的批准药物进行了胚胎发育(EFD)研究。大鼠和兔子是最常用的物种(分别占研究的 77% 和 62%)。在生物制药测试中,啮齿类动物(43% 的 EFD 研究)比非人灵长类动物(29%)和兔子(29%)更常用。大多数(75%)用于治疗癌症的生物制药在未进行EFD研究的情况下获得批准。在41种同时对大鼠和兔子进行了EFD研究的药物中,兔子似乎对母体毒性和发育毒性更为敏感(分别占61%和63%)。大多数药物(76%)的大鼠和家兔发育毒性最低观测不良效应水平相差 2 倍以上。对于作用方式已知对妊娠有明显危害的药物,不需要进行 EFD 研究,如果在一个物种或初步 EFD 研究中已观察到与临床相关的发育影响,则一般不再进行进一步的 EFD 研究。许多药物标签显示出与 PLLR 规则的细微偏差:用于计算暴露阈值的指标以及是否存在母体毒性并不总是明确说明。不过,这些疏漏对处方者来说意义不大。本系列中的五篇综述现在展示了自2014年以来批准的所有小分子药物和迄今为止批准的所有治疗性单克隆抗体的EFD研究资料汇编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive toxicology
Reproductive toxicology 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Drawing from a large number of disciplines, Reproductive Toxicology publishes timely, original research on the influence of chemical and physical agents on reproduction. Written by and for obstetricians, pediatricians, embryologists, teratologists, geneticists, toxicologists, andrologists, and others interested in detecting potential reproductive hazards, the journal is a forum for communication among researchers and practitioners. Articles focus on the application of in vitro, animal and clinical research to the practice of clinical medicine. All aspects of reproduction are within the scope of Reproductive Toxicology, including the formation and maturation of male and female gametes, sexual function, the events surrounding the fusion of gametes and the development of the fertilized ovum, nourishment and transport of the conceptus within the genital tract, implantation, embryogenesis, intrauterine growth, placentation and placental function, parturition, lactation and neonatal survival. Adverse reproductive effects in males will be considered as significant as adverse effects occurring in females. To provide a balanced presentation of approaches, equal emphasis will be given to clinical and animal or in vitro work. Typical end points that will be studied by contributors include infertility, sexual dysfunction, spontaneous abortion, malformations, abnormal histogenesis, stillbirth, intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity, behavioral abnormalities, and perinatal mortality.
期刊最新文献
Nicotinamide mononucleotide enhances the developmental potential of mouse early embryos exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid Prenatal high-sucrose diet affects pulmonary artery contractile functions via MT receptors Multi-omics revealed activation of TNF-α induced apoptosis signaling pathway in testis of DEHP treated prepubertal male rat. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathway– Ethanol interactions disrupt palate formation independent of gata3 Could probiotics be used as a novel therapeutic approach to alleviate the reproductive and neurobehavioral side effects of sertraline? A study in male mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1