The effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02634-w
Marie Nguyen, Liem Tran, Andrew Foreman, Craig Lockwood
{"title":"The effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marie Nguyen, Liem Tran, Andrew Foreman, Craig Lockwood","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02634-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibrin sealants are increasingly used in head and neck surgery to aid hemostasis, but individual studies lack conclusive evidence. This systematic review investigates their effectiveness compared to placebo or usual care in head and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies comparing fibrin sealant to placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement were included. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of hematoma, blood transfusion rates, and adverse reactions. Electronic databases were searched on October 2023 for randomized controlled and quasi-experimental studies. Studies underwent independent screening, review, and appraisal by two reviewers using JBI appraisal tools. Certainty was assessed with GRADE, and meta-analysis was conducted using JBI SUMARI, presenting effect sizes as relative risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included examining 904 patients. The fibrin sealant group exhibited reduced postoperative wound complications (hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, wound infection) (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92), shorter drain removal times (MD =  - 0.49 days, 95% CI =  - 0.68 to - 0.29), decreased drain output (MD =  - 16.52 mL, 95% CI =  - 18.56 to - 14.52), and shorter hospital stay (MD =  - 0.84 days, 95% CI =  - 1.11 to - 0.57) compared to controls. There was no statistically significant difference on the rate of intervention for postoperative hematoma and the rate of adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Evidence demonstrates with low certainty that fibrin sealant use is associated with a modest reduction in the rate of wound complications, drain duration, and length of stay, and a small reduction in drain volume output. Methodological weaknesses and clinical heterogeneity limit these findings. Further research should focus on enhancing methodological quality and exploring the cost-effectiveness of fibrin sealant use in surgery.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42023412820.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Nil.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"246"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02634-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibrin sealants are increasingly used in head and neck surgery to aid hemostasis, but individual studies lack conclusive evidence. This systematic review investigates their effectiveness compared to placebo or usual care in head and neck surgery.

Methods: Studies comparing fibrin sealant to placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement were included. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of hematoma, blood transfusion rates, and adverse reactions. Electronic databases were searched on October 2023 for randomized controlled and quasi-experimental studies. Studies underwent independent screening, review, and appraisal by two reviewers using JBI appraisal tools. Certainty was assessed with GRADE, and meta-analysis was conducted using JBI SUMARI, presenting effect sizes as relative risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Fourteen studies were included examining 904 patients. The fibrin sealant group exhibited reduced postoperative wound complications (hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, wound infection) (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92), shorter drain removal times (MD =  - 0.49 days, 95% CI =  - 0.68 to - 0.29), decreased drain output (MD =  - 16.52 mL, 95% CI =  - 18.56 to - 14.52), and shorter hospital stay (MD =  - 0.84 days, 95% CI =  - 1.11 to - 0.57) compared to controls. There was no statistically significant difference on the rate of intervention for postoperative hematoma and the rate of adverse reactions.

Discussion: Evidence demonstrates with low certainty that fibrin sealant use is associated with a modest reduction in the rate of wound complications, drain duration, and length of stay, and a small reduction in drain volume output. Methodological weaknesses and clinical heterogeneity limit these findings. Further research should focus on enhancing methodological quality and exploring the cost-effectiveness of fibrin sealant use in surgery.

Systematic review registration: CRD42023412820.

Funding: Nil.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维蛋白密封剂在头颈部手术中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:头颈部手术中越来越多地使用纤维蛋白密封剂来帮助止血,但个别研究缺乏确凿证据。本系统综述调查了纤维蛋白密封剂与安慰剂或常规护理在头颈部手术中的有效性:方法:纳入了对接受头颈部软组织手术并放置引流管的 18 岁或以上患者进行纤维蛋白密封剂与安慰剂或常规护理比较的研究。主要结果包括伤口并发症和术后手术移除引流管的时间。次要结果包括住院时间、引流管排出量、血肿的手术处理、输血率和不良反应。我们于 2023 年 10 月在电子数据库中检索了随机对照研究和准实验研究。由两名审稿人使用 JBI 鉴定工具对研究进行独立筛选、审查和鉴定。使用 GRADE 评估确定性,并使用 JBI SUMARI 进行荟萃分析,以相对风险比或平均差异及 95% 置信区间表示效应大小:共纳入了 14 项研究,对 904 名患者进行了检查。纤维蛋白密封剂组减少了术后伤口并发症(血肿、血清肿、伤口裂开、伤口感染)(RR = 0.64,95% CI = 0.45-0.92),缩短了引流管移除时间(MD = - 0.49 天,95% CI = - 0.与对照组相比,引流管输出量减少(MD = - 16.52 mL,95% CI = - 18.56 to - 14.52),住院时间缩短(MD = - 0.84 天,95% CI = - 1.11 to - 0.57)。术后血肿干预率和不良反应发生率在统计学上没有明显差异:讨论:有证据表明,使用纤维蛋白密封剂可适度降低伤口并发症的发生率、引流时间和住院时间,并可少量减少引流容量,但这一证据的确定性较低。方法上的缺陷和临床异质性限制了这些研究结果。进一步的研究应侧重于提高方法的质量,并探索在外科手术中使用纤维蛋白密封剂的成本效益:CRD42023412820.Funding:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature. Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria. Patient-related prognostic factors for function and pain after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. The psychometric properties of instruments measuring ethical sensitivity in nursing: a systematic review. Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in pediatric clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1