Comparative yield of EBUS-TBNA with EBUS-IFBTLP for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17534666241282217
Rui Zhang, Wenping Zhang, Xiangsong Cheng, Dan Si, Bao Liu, Xingang Hu, Xianliang Chen, Zhuquan Su
{"title":"Comparative yield of EBUS-TBNA with EBUS-IFBTLP for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.","authors":"Rui Zhang, Wenping Zhang, Xiangsong Cheng, Dan Si, Bao Liu, Xingang Hu, Xianliang Chen, Zhuquan Su","doi":"10.1177/17534666241282217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with mediastinal lymph node enlargement (MLNE) are diagnosed depending on lymph node biopsy. Whereas, how to obtain larger tissue masses from mediastinal lymph nodes and improve the diagnostic yield of the disease remains to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aiming to assess the diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy via transbronchial laser photoablation (EBUS-IFB-TLP) in patients with MLNE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, self-controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 67 MLNE patients requiring a lymph node biopsy for diagnosis at the Henan Provincial People's Hospital and the Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital in China, from January 2020 to December 2022. Each patient underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA group) and EBUS-IFB-TLP (EBUS-IFB-TLP group) on the same mediastinal lymph node for biopsies. The operation time, diagnostic efficiency, and complication rates of the two biopsy methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of diagnosed patients in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and the EBUS-TBNA groups was 65 (97.0%) and 57 (85.1%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.021). In the EBUS-IFB-TLP group, 28 cases (96.6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer and were classified into different epithelial types. In the EBUS-TBNA group, there were 27 cases (93.1%) diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 26 (89.7%) were classified into different epithelial types. There were 37 (97.4%) and 30 (78.9%) non-lung cancer patients diagnosed in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and EBUS-TBNA groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.039), while 27 cases (96.4%) of sarcoidosis in the EBUS-IFB-TLP group and 20 cases (71.4%) of sarcoidosis in the EBUS-TBNA group were diagnosed (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The percentages of intraoperative mild to moderate bleeding complications were 23.9% (16/67) and 14.9% (10/67) in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and in the EBUS-TBNA groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that EBUS-IFB-TLP could be a feasible and effective method in the diagnosis of patients with MLNE, presenting an analogous safety profile compared with EBUS-TBNA. Further studies are needed to verify the diagnostic performance of EBUS-IFB-TLP for MLNE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"17534666241282217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241282217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with mediastinal lymph node enlargement (MLNE) are diagnosed depending on lymph node biopsy. Whereas, how to obtain larger tissue masses from mediastinal lymph nodes and improve the diagnostic yield of the disease remains to be investigated.

Objectives: Aiming to assess the diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy via transbronchial laser photoablation (EBUS-IFB-TLP) in patients with MLNE.

Design: A prospective, self-controlled study.

Methods: This study was conducted on 67 MLNE patients requiring a lymph node biopsy for diagnosis at the Henan Provincial People's Hospital and the Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital in China, from January 2020 to December 2022. Each patient underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA group) and EBUS-IFB-TLP (EBUS-IFB-TLP group) on the same mediastinal lymph node for biopsies. The operation time, diagnostic efficiency, and complication rates of the two biopsy methods were compared.

Results: The number of diagnosed patients in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and the EBUS-TBNA groups was 65 (97.0%) and 57 (85.1%), respectively (p = 0.021). In the EBUS-IFB-TLP group, 28 cases (96.6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer and were classified into different epithelial types. In the EBUS-TBNA group, there were 27 cases (93.1%) diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 26 (89.7%) were classified into different epithelial types. There were 37 (97.4%) and 30 (78.9%) non-lung cancer patients diagnosed in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and EBUS-TBNA groups, respectively (p = 0.039), while 27 cases (96.4%) of sarcoidosis in the EBUS-IFB-TLP group and 20 cases (71.4%) of sarcoidosis in the EBUS-TBNA group were diagnosed (p = 0.016). The percentages of intraoperative mild to moderate bleeding complications were 23.9% (16/67) and 14.9% (10/67) in the EBUS-IFB-TLP and in the EBUS-TBNA groups, respectively (p = 0.109).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that EBUS-IFB-TLP could be a feasible and effective method in the diagnosis of patients with MLNE, presenting an analogous safety profile compared with EBUS-TBNA. Further studies are needed to verify the diagnostic performance of EBUS-IFB-TLP for MLNE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EBUS-TBNA与EBUS-IFBTLP在纵隔淋巴结病诊断中的产量比较。
背景:纵隔淋巴结肿大(MLNE)患者的诊断主要依靠淋巴结活检。然而,如何从纵隔淋巴结获取更大的组织块并提高疾病的诊断率仍有待研究:旨在评估支气管内超声引导下通过经支气管激光光化术(EBUS-IFB-TLP)进行结节内镊子活检对 MLNE 患者的诊断价值:前瞻性自控研究:本研究于2020年1月至2022年12月在河南省人民医院和阜外华中心血管病医院对67名需要进行淋巴结活检诊断的MLNE患者进行了研究。每位患者均在同一纵隔淋巴结上接受了支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术(EBUS-TBNA组)和EBUS-IFB-TLP(EBUS-IFB-TLP组)活检。比较了两种活检方法的手术时间、诊断效率和并发症发生率:EBUS-IFB-TLP组和EBUS-TBNA组确诊患者人数分别为65(97.0%)和57(85.1%)(P = 0.021)。在 EBUS-IFB-TLP 组中,28 例(96.6%)确诊为肺癌,并被分为不同的上皮类型。在 EBUS-TBNA 组中,27 例(93.1%)确诊为肺癌,其中 26 例(89.7%)分为不同的上皮类型。EBUS-IFB-TLP 组和 EBUS-TBNA 组分别有 37 例(97.4%)和 30 例(78.9%)非肺癌患者被确诊(P = 0.039),而 EBUS-IFB-TLP 组有 27 例(96.4%)肉样瘤病,EBUS-TBNA 组有 20 例(71.4%)肉样瘤病被确诊(P = 0.016)。EBUS-IFB-TLP组和EBUS-TBNA组术中轻中度出血并发症的比例分别为23.9%(16/67)和14.9%(10/67)(p = 0.109):本研究表明,EBUS-IFB-TLP 是诊断 MLNE 患者的一种可行且有效的方法,与 EBUS-TBNA 相比,其安全性相似。还需要进一步研究来验证 EBUS-IFB-TLP 对 MLNE 的诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
期刊最新文献
Prone positioning during CPAP therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a concise clinical review. Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data. Referral rates and barriers to lung transplantation based on pulmonary function criteria in interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective cohort study. A comparison between a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire-based algorithm and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. Post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index: a new parameter for the identification of non-acid gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1